Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neo-liberal Macroeconomic Policy and Structural Transformation of Indian Economy: Impact on Income, Employment and Distribution

  • Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predominant objective of macroeconomic policies in developing countries has been to achieve higher level of potential economic growth and sustain it once it is achieved. Macroeconomic policy in India, on the backdrop of severe balance of payment crisis, has witnessed major shift in the early 1990s when neo-liberal economic policy on the pressure of IMF and World Bank has been adopted abandoning the socialist pattern of economic policy pursued in the post-independence period. Since implementation its scope has been consistently widening in terms of economic reform in different sectors of the economy, now its impact both positive and adverse is clearly visible. Since the last two and half decades, the serious adverse implication of the new economic policy is visible, particularly on the widening income inequality, although there has been positive effect on achieved higher aggregate economic growth. The major channel through which it is manifested is less than desired performance on labour market as employment generation has slowed down drastically when compared to the long-term trend in employment generation. In post-1991 period during 1993–1994 and 2011–2012, the growth in employment has been around 1.3% per annum against long-term growth rate of 2.11% per annum between 1977–1978 and 2011–2012. Even those employments generated are mostly in construction and low-productive services sector and are precarious and casual in nature. The paper has contributed in understanding the phenomena of rising inequality in the nature of production, through examination of structure and composition of output, employment and emerging wide disparity across sectors. We have shown by examining output per worker and concentration of workforce across sectors the problem of existing and rising income inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Authors’ calculation from CSO data (2004–2005 prices)

Fig. 2

Source: same as shown in Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Source: same as shown in Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Source: Papola and Sahu (2012) and authors’ calculations from NSS unit record data on EUS

Fig. 5

Source: NSSO various rounds

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Demand neutrality implies that prices will remain unchanged even if expansionary policies are pursued as there exists in economy in short-run unutilized capacity which can be employed for meeting demand increase.

  2. Money neutrality here implies that any increase in money supply or expansionary policy will lead to equal rise in prices level, and thus, demand in the economy will be unaffected. It implies increasing fiscal expenditure will produce inflationary pressure and further advocating inflationary targeting through some wishful target of fiscal deficit.

  3. Output per worker for the aggregate level is calculated only for those periods for which income data for different sector are available for both rural and urban areas. Thus, aggregate income for different sector here is calculated by aggregating rural and urban output for every sector. So it may not match exactly with the output per worker calculated from aggregate data, but the trend is similar.

  4. The decline gap in the output per worker of agriculture and allied sector vis-à-vis other sectors is also due to decline in the size of workforce who have instead of shifting to other sector for work has exited labour market. There has been extensive study on decline female labour force participation rate. Thus, net effect of this requires to examine distribution of actual income data which is not attempted here.

References

  • Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Esther Duflo. 2013. Poor economics: Rethinking poverty and the ways to end it. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignion, Francois. 2015. The globalization of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Sukti, and Ajit Singh. 2005. Will service be the engine of indian economic growth? Development and Change 36(6): 1035–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. 2015. The great escape: Health, wealth and origin of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, Amaresh, Sukhadeo Thorat, and Shivakar Tiwari. 2015. Growth and poverty across states in India: The social group dimensions. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies 2(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, Amaresh, Wendy Olsen, and Kunal Sen. 2017. The decline in the labour force participation of women in India: Taking a long-run view. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 2017: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Ben, and Ourania Dimakou. 2016. Macroeconomics: A critical companion. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, Ajit. 2004. The employment challenge in India. Economic and Political Weekly 39(48): 5106–5116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Jayati. 2004. Macroeconomic reforms and a labour policy framework for India. Employment Analysis Unit, Employment Strategy Department, International Labour Office.

  • Himanshu, 2011. Employment in India: A re-examination. Economic and Political Weekly 46(37): 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2002): “Decent Work and the Informal Economy”, Report VI, International Labour Conference 90th Session, 2002, ILO, Geneva.

  • Kanbur, Ravi. 2017. Informality: Causes, consequences and policy responses. Review of Development Economics 3: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal, Ashok, Bharat Ramaswami, and William Wadhwa. 2011. Economic liberalisation and indian economic growth: What’s the evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 49(4): 1152–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review 45(1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Arthur W. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School 22(2): 39–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnar, Myrdal. 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCEUS. 2009. The challenge of employment in India: An informal economy perspective, vol. I. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, Arvind. 2004. Growth and reforms during 1980s and 1990s. Economic and Political Weekly 39(2): 2581–2594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papola T. S., and Pratha Pritam Sahu. 2012. Growth and structure of employment in India: Long-term and post-reform performance and the emerging challenges. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, Working Paper.

  • Patnaik, Prabhat. 2006. Technology and Employment in an Open Underdeveloped Economy, mimeo presented at the First Sumitra Chishti Memorial Lecture, New Delhi, 3 Mar.

  • Patnaik, Utsa. 2008. The questions of employment and livelihood in labour surplus economies. Social Scientist 36(5/6): 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in twenty first century. Mumbai: Harvard Business School Press India Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, Gerry, and Vidhya Soundarajan. 2016. Patterns of inequality in the Indian labour market, 1983-2012. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Ravi.S., and Ajay Naik. 2017. Growth and informality in the Indian economy. In Labour and Development: Essays in Honour of Prof. T.S. Papola, ed. K.P. Kannan, R.P. Mamgain, and P. Rustagi. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2013. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, Sukhadeo, and Amaresh Dubey. 2012. Has growth been socially inclusive during 1993-94-2009-10? Economic and Political Weekly 47(10): 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, Shivakar. 2016. Reducing gender inequality in rural labour market through public works: An analysis. Journal of Economics and Commerce 7(2): 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shivakar Tiwari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiwari, S., Kumar, S. Neo-liberal Macroeconomic Policy and Structural Transformation of Indian Economy: Impact on Income, Employment and Distribution. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 62, 219–238 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00166-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00166-9

Keywords

Navigation