Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidential Supplier Selection Based on Interval Data Fusion

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supplier selection is a common and important problem, which is usually modeled in a multi-criterion decision-making framework. In this framework, multiple criteria need to be determined and an expert team needs to be constructed. Generally, different criteria and experts always hold different weights. Due to the complexity of the practical problems, sometimes lots of fuzzy and uncertain information exists inevitably and the weights are tough to determine accurately. Interval number is a simple but effective method to handle the uncertainty. However, most current papers transform an interval number to a crisp number to make decisions, which causes loss of information more or less. To address this issue, a new evidential method based on interval data fusion is proposed in this paper. Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is a widely used method in a supplier selection problem due to its powerful ability in handling uncertainty. In our method, the criteria and decision makers are weighted in the form of interval numbers to generate interval basic probability probabilities, which represent the supporting degree to an event in Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. The obtained interval basic probabilities assignments are fused to make a final decision. Due to the properties of interval data, our method has its own specific advantages, like losing less information, providing different strategies for decision making and so on. The new method is proposed aiming at solving multi-criterion decision-making problems in which the reliability of decision makers or weights of criteria are described in the form of fuzzy data like linguistic terms or interval data. A numerical example of supplier selection is used to illustrate our method. Also, the results and comparison show the correctness and effectiveness of the new interval data fusing evidential method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jato-Espino, D., Castillo-Lopez, E., Rodriguez-Hernandez, J., Canteras-Jordana, J.C.: A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction. Autom. Constr. 45(Supplement C), 151–162 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mateos, A., Jiménez-Martín, A., Aguayo, E., Sabio, P.: Dominance intensity measuring methods in MCDM with ordinal relations regarding weights. Knowl. Based Syst. 70, 26–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hung, Y.H., Huang, T.L., Hsieh, J.C., Tsuei, H.J., Cheng, C.C., Tzeng, G.H.: Online reputation management for improving marketing by using a hybrid MCDM model. Knowl. Based Syst. 35, 87–93 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gong, Y.B.: Fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to global supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 15(4), 392–400 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, X.H., Wang, J.Q., Peng, J.J., Chen, X.H.: Cross-entropy and prioritized aggregation operator with simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(6), 1–13 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, T., Deng, Y., Chan, F.: Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, X., Jiang, W.: An evidential axiomatic design approach for decision making using the evaluation of belief structure satisfaction to uncertain target values. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017, in press). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21,929

  8. Lin, M., Xu, Z., Zhai, Y., Yao, Z.: Multi-attribute group decision-making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0182-y

  9. Rezaei, J., Hemmes, A., Tavasszy, L.: Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight. J. Air Transp. Manag. 61, 95–105 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, S., Jiang, W., Deng, X., Shou, Y.: A modified physarum-inspired model for the user equilibrium traffic assignment problem. Appl. Math. Model. (2017, in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.07.032

  11. Jiang, W., Wei, B., Tang, Y., Zhou, D.: Ordered visibility graph average aggregation operator: an application in produced water management. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 27(2), Article ID 023117 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Y., Li, T., Luo, C., Fujita, H., jinn Horng, S.: Dynamic variable precision rough set approach for probabilistic set-valued information systems. Knowl. Based Syst. 122, 131–147 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Technometrics 20(1), 242 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deng, X., Xiao, F., Deng, Y.: An improved distance-based total uncertainty measure in belief function theory. Appl. Intell. 46(4), 898–915 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, W., Wang, S.: An uncertainty measure for interval-valued evidences. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 12(5), 631–644 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu, C., Yang, J.B., Yang, S.L.: A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246(3), 886–893 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mo, H., Deng, Y.: A new aggregating operator in linguistic decision making based on D numbers. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 24(6), 831–846 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, X., Deng, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on D numbers and AHP. Nucl. Eng. Des. 313, 243–252 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, X., Deng, Y.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on evidence credibility decay model and IOWA operator. Ann. Nucl. Energy 112, 673–684 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, H., Deng, Y.: Evaluation method based on fuzzy relations between Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21956

  22. Zheng, H., Deng, Y., Hu, Y.: Fuzzy evidential influence diagram and its evaluation algorithm. Knowl. Based Syst. 131, 28–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deng, X., Jiang, W., Zhang, J.: Zero-sum matrix game with payoffs of Dempster–Shafer belief structures and its applications on sensors. Sensors 17(4), Article ID 922 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang, W., Zhan, J.: A modified combination rule in generalized evidence theory. Appl. Intell. 46(3), 630–640 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0851-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, X., Zhu, J., Song, Y., Lei, L.: Combination of unreliable evidence sources in intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM framework. Knowl. Based Syst. 97, 24–39 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, J.M., Carladous, S., Yang, Y.: Decision-Making with Belief Interval Distance. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, X., Song, Y., Quan, W.: Evaluating evidence reliability based on intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM model. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31(3), 1167–1182 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(65), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Shih, Y.Y., Su, S.F., Rudas, I.J.: Fuzzy based compensation for image stabilization in a camera hand-shake emulation system. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 16(3), 350–357 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, W., Wei, B., Liu, X., Li, X., Zheng, H.: Intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operator based on entropy and its application in decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017) Published online. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21,939

  31. Chou, C.C.: A generalized similarity measure for fuzzy numbers. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30(2), 1147–1155 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, R., Ashuri, B., Deng, Y.: A novel method for forecasting time series based on fuzzy logic and visibility graph. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11,634-017-0300-3

  33. Luo, A.C., Chen, S.W., Fang, C.Y.: Gaussian successive fuzzy integral for sequential multi-decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(2), 1–16 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, R., Ran, X., Wang, C., Deng, Y.: Fuzzy evaluation of network vulnerability. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 32(5), 1715–1730 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fei, L., Wang, H., Chen, L., Deng, Y.: A new vector valued similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on OWA operators. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017) (accepted)

  36. Afzali, A., Rafsanjani, M.K., Saeid, A.B.: A fuzzy multi-objective linear programming model based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(5), 864–874 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhad, S., Makui, A.: A hybrid fuzzy-intelligent system for group multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(6), 1–14 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, W., Liao, H.: A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970–2015. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(1), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, Y.C.: Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making in the determination of critical criteria for assessing service quality of travel websites. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 6439–6445 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiang, W., Xie, C., Zhuang, M., Tang, Y.: Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method. Appl. Soft Comput. 57, 672–683 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Su, S.F., Chuang, C.C., Tao, C.W., Jeng, J.T., Hsiao, C.C.: Radial basis function networks with linear interval regression weights for symbolic interval data. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 42(1), 69–80 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lei, Q., Xu, Z., Bustince, H., Fernandez, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy integrals based on archimedean t-conorms and t-norms. Inf. Sci. 327, 57–70 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, N., Liu, X., Wei, D.: A modified D numbers’ integration for multiple attributes decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0323-0

  44. Zhang, Z.: Several new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher hybrid operators and their application to multi-criteria group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(5), 829–848 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, S., Yu, F., Xu, W., Zhang, W.: New approach to MCDM under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 4(6), 671–678 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, S.M., Huang, Z.C.: Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf. Sci. 381, 341–351 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, C.Y., Chen, S.M.: Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf. Sci. 397–398, 155–167 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tang, H.: Decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and its algorithm. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 23(1), 119–131 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(4), 637–666 (2015)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Tao, Z., Liu, X., Chen, H., Zhou, L.: Ranking interval-valued fuzzy numbers with intuitionistic fuzzy possibility degree and its application to fuzzy multi-attribute? decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 646–658 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Joshi, D., Kumar, S.: Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy choquet integral based topsis method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248(1), 183–191 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: An algorithmic method to extend topsis for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 175(2), 1375–1384 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Yue, Z.: A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Modell. 35(4), 1926–1936 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Deng, Y., Chan, F.T.S.: A new fuzzy Dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9854–9861 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bosc, P., Prade, H.: An Introduction to the Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory-Based Treatment of Flexible Queries and Uncertain or Imprecise Databases. Springer, New York (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Gupta, M.M.: Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 47(1), 101–109 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy Set Theory—and its Applications. Springer Science & Business Media (2011)

  58. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II. Inf. Sci. 8(75), 301–357 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang, X., Mahadevan, S., Deng, X.: Reliability analysis with linguistic data: an evidential network approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 162, 111–121 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, X., Deng, Y., Chan, F.T.S., Adamatzky, A., Mahadevan, S.: Supplier selection based on evidence theory and analytic network process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 230(3), 562–573 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artif. Intell. 66(94), 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, Berlin (1981b)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, Berlin (1981a)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, Q., Li, M., Deng, Y.: Measure the structure similarity of nodes in complex networks based on relative entropy. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.042

  66. Hamdan, S., Cheaitou, A.: Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: an MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 81, 282–304 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. Guo, S., Zhao, H.: Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl. Based Syst. 121, 23–31 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ren, J., Liang, H., Chan, F.T.: Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for eco-city: multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 116, 29–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Brown, J.R., Bushuev, M.A., Kretinin, A.A., Guiffrida, A.L.: Recent developments in green supply chain management: sourcing and logistics. In: Khan, M., Hussain, M., Ajmal, M.M (eds.) Green Supply Chain Management for Sustainable Business Practice, 197–217 (2016)

  70. Wu, D.: Supplier selection in a fuzzy group setting: a method using gray related analysis and Dempster–Shafer theory. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 8892–8899 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to reviews for their valuable and constructive comments. The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program Nos. 61671384, 61703338), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2016JM6018), Project of Science and Technology Foundation, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Program No. 3102017OQD020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, Shaanxi, China

    Zichang He & Wen Jiang

  2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

    Felix T. S. Chan

Authors
  1. Zichang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wen Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix T. S. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Z., Jiang, W. & Chan, F.T.S. Evidential Supplier Selection Based on Interval Data Fusion. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 1159–1171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0426-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0426-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation