Abstract
Mate poaching has long been described as an intrasexually competitive tactic for acquiring new mating opportunities (Buss, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628, 1988); one that confers increased risk or rejection, retaliation, or reputational damage, and thus should be most successful when implemented by those who are most desirable to members of the opposite sex. From this perspective, mate poaching should be predicted by trait differences in intrasexual competitiveness, and this link should be moderated by one’s own mate value as an index of the ability to succeed in poaching efforts and to bear the burden of the associated risks. Undergraduate men and women (N = 292) completed measures of intrasexual competitiveness, mate value, and mate poaching (successful and unsuccessful). Results showed that intrasexual competitiveness predicted a greater number of both successful and unsuccessful poaching attempts. Mate value moderated this relationship for successful, but not unsuccessful, mate poaching, such that individuals who were both intrasexually competitive and high in mate value reported the greatest success. Results suggest that mate poaching is an intrasexually competitive mating tactic; the success of which depends in part upon the mate value of the perpetrator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.510132.
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.3. isbn:978-1-63463-131-0.
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x.
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Mate poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.11.2013.2.2.
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.
Arnocky, S., Pearson, M., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Health, anticipated partner infidelity, and jealousy in men and women. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915593666.
Arnocky, S., Woodruff, N. W., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Men’s sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate-availability. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12118.
Arnocky, S., Piché, T., Albert, G., Ouillette, D., & Barclay, P. (2017). Altruism predicts mating success in humans. British Journal of Psychology,108(2), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12208.
Arnocky, S., Proietti, V., Ruddick, E. L., Côté, T. R., Ortiz, T. L., Hodson, G., & Carré, J. M. (2019). Aggression toward sexualized women is mediated by decreased perceptions of humanness. Psychological Science, 30(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619836106.
Belu, C. F., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2019). Once a poacher always a poacher? Mate poaching history and its association with relationship quality. The Journal of Sex Research, 57, 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1610150.
Brase, G. L., & Guy, E. C. (2004). The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00117-X.
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616.
Buunk, A., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
Davies, A. P. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Comparisons of the effectiveness of mate attraction tactics across mate poaching and general attraction and across types of romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.001.
Davies, A. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Don't you wish your partner was hot like me?: The effectiveness of mate poaching across relationship types considering the relative mate-values of the poacher and the partner of the poached. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.029.
Davies, A. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2006a). An evolutionary psychological perspective on infidelity. In P. R. Peluso (Ed.), In Love’s Debris: A Practitioner’s Guide to Addressing Infidelity in Couples Therapy (Routledge series on Family Therapy). New York: Routledge.
Davies, A. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2006b). “Attached” or “Unattached”: With whom do men and women prefer to mate, and why? Psychological Topics, 15(2), 297–314.
Davies, A. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Hass, R. G. (2007). When a poach is not a poach: Redefining human mate poaching and re-estimating its frequency. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 702–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9158-8.
Davies, A. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Hass, R. G. (2010). Sex differences in the perceptions of benefits and costs of mate poaching. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.014.
Davies, A. P. C., Tranter, A. E., & Shackelford, T. K. (2019). Not clearly defined, not reliably measured, and not replicable: Revisiting the definition and measurement of human mate poaching. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.036.
Davis, A., Mattsson, A., Belanger, J., & Arnocky, S. (2019). Hostility mediates the relations between self-perceived physical health status and cost-inflicting mate retention. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000188.
Fisher, M. L., & Wade, T. J. (2020). Mate poaching. In T. Shackelford & V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. New York: Springer.
Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099347.
Foster, J. D., Jonason, P. K., Shrira, I., Campbell, W. K., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Varner, S. C. (2014). What do you get when you make somebody else’s partner your own? An analysis of relationships formed via mate poaching. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.008.
Guéguen, N., & Lamy, L. (2012). Men’s social status and attractiveness: Women’s receptivity to men’s date requests. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71(3), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000083.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the dark triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.003.
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., & Krones, J. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294202008.
Locke, A., & Arnocky, S. (2020). Eating disorders. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_696-1.
Lyons, M., Gillies, N., & Brewer, G. (2019). Dark triad traits, Facebook intensity, and intrasexual competition. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.012.
Moran, J., & Wade, T. J. (2017). Sex and the perceived effectiveness of short-term mate poaching acts in college students. Human Ethology Bulletin, 32(3), 109–128.
Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2019a). Perceptions of a mismatched couple: The role of attractiveness on mate poaching and copying. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000187.
Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2019b). Self-perceived success in mate poaching: How a couple’s attractiveness and relationship duration impact men’s short-term poaching intentions. Human Ethology, 34, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/34/026-040.
Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. (2020). Mate retention behaviours and jealousy in hypothetical mate-poaching situations: Measuring the effects of sex, context, and rivals’ attributes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00207-y.
Parker, J., & Burkley, M. (2009). Who’s chasing whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 1016–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.022.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global Sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Salkicevic, S., Stanic, L. A., & Grabovac, M. T. (2014). Good mates retain us right: Investigating the relationships between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200512.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894.
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Angleitner, A., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., Bianchi, G., Boholst, F., Borg Cunen, M. A., Braeckman, J., Brainerd 2nd, E. G., Caral, L. G., Caron, G., Casullo, M. M., Cunningham, M., Daibo, I., de Backer, C., de Souza, E., Diaz-Loving, R., Diniz, G., Durkin, K., Echegaray, M., Eremsoy, E., Euler, H. A., Falzon, R., Fisher, M. L., Foley, D., Fry, D. P., Fry, S., Ghayur, M. A., Golden, D. L., Grammer, K., Grimaldi, L., Halberstadt, J., Haque, S., Herrera, D., Hertel, J., Hoffmann, H., Hooper, D., Hradilekova, Z., Hudek-Kene-evi, J., Jaafar, J., Jankauskaite, M., Kabangu-Stahel, H., Kardum, I., Khoury, B., Kwon, H., Laidra, K., Laireiter, A. R., Lakerveld, D., Lampert, A., Lauri, M., Lavallée, M., Lee, S. J., Leung, L. C., Locke, K. D., Locke, V., Luksik, I., Magaisa, I., Marcinkeviciene, D., Mata, A., Mata, R., McCarthy, B., Mills, M. E., Mkhize, N. J., Moreira, J., Moreira, S., Moya, M., Munyae, M., Noller, P., Opre, A., Panayiotou, A., Petrovic, N., Poels, K., Popper, M., Poulimenou, M., P'yatokha, V., Raymond, M., Reips, U. D., Reneau, S. E., Rivera-Aragon, S., Rowatt, W. C., Ruch, W., Rus, V. S., Safir, M. P., Salas, S., Sambataro, F., Sandnabba, K. N., Schulmeyer, M. K., Schütz, A., Scrimali, T., Shackelford, T. K., Shaver, P. R., Sichona, F., Simonetti, F., Sineshaw, T., Sookdew, R., Speelman, T., Spyrou, S., Sümer, H. C., Sümer, N., Supekova, M., Szlendak, T., Timmermans, B., Tooke, W., Tsaousis, I., Tungaraza, F. S., van Overwalle, F., Vandermassen, G., Vanhoomissen, T., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Vasey, P. L., Verissimo, J., Voracek, M., Wan, W. W., Wang, T. W., Weiss, P., Wijaya, A., Woertman, L., Youn, G., Zupanèiè, A., & International Sexuality Description Project. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 560–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.86.4.560.
Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9974-y.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 180–230). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Development Grant (file # DDG-2017-00013) awarded to S. Arnocky.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnocky, S. Mate-Value Moderates the Relationship between Intrasexual Competitiveness and Successful Mate Poaching. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 346–353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00242-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00242-0