Skip to main content
Log in

Metabolomics Tools to Study Links Between Pollution and Human Health: an Exposomics Perspective

  • Human Health Effects of Environmental Pollution (KC Makris, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pollution Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metabolomics (and exposomics) as disciplines provide an unprecedented opportunity to delve into the chemical space of our environmental health and pollution landscape in the most comprehensible and high throughput manner. Ranging from diet, drugs and medications, personal care and hygiene products, cosmetics, microbiome-derived chemicals, volatile organic carbons, breathe volatiles, gases, pollutants, metals, modified endogenous metabolites, and other industrial chemicals are all represented in this chemical ecosystem which we collectively call as exposures. Approaches such as innovations in sampling and sample preparation and extraction, to analytical instrumentation, computational strategies, and bioinformatic interrogation of the datasets, continue to explode in this hot area of research. Particularly, numerous high throughput and newly developed high resolution (HR)/accurate mass (AM)–mass-spectrometry (MS)-based platforms have begun to be instrumental in capturing this chemical space around us, be it volatiles, aerosols, synthetic chemicals, or dissolved organics, in the context of environmental health (i.e., pollution) and human health (and disease). In this review, I summarize the most recently developed, relevant, updated and important analytical platforms (from mass spectrometry to spectroscopy), informatics resources, tools, databases, and strategies in metabolomics research that hold promise as tool kits for exposomics research for superior understanding of human health and disease status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADI-MS:

Ambient desorption/ionization mass spectrometry

AMS:

Aerosol mass spectrometry

CE-MS:

Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry

CI:

Chemical ionization

DB:

Database

DI-MS:

Direct infusion mass spectrometry

EI:

Electron ionization

EPA:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

FT-MS:

Fourier-transform mass spectrometry

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography mass spectrometry

GUI:

Graphical user interface

HMDB:

Human Metabolome Database

HRMS:

High resolution mass spectrometry

IMS:

Ion mobility spectrometry

IR:

Infrared

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

LC-MS:

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

MS:

Mass spectrometry

MS/MS:

Tandem mass spectrometry

NIST:

National Institute of Standards and Technology

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

PPCP:

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products

QQQ:

Triple quadrupole

SIFT-MS:

Selected-ion-flow tube mass spectrometry

SPME:

Solid phase microextraction

TOF:

Time of flight

VOC:

Volatile organic carbon

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark. 2005;14(8):1847–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloszies CS, Fiehn O. Using untargeted metabolomics for detecting exposome compounds. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018;8:87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amann A, de Lacy CB, Miekisch W, Schubert J, Buszewski B, Pleil J, et al. The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. J Breath Res. 2014;8(3):034001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Lacy CB, Amann A, Al-Kateb H, Flynn C, Filipiak W, Khalid T, et al. A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. J Breath Res. 2014;8(1):014001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. • Bundy JG, Davey MP, Viant MR. Environmental metabolomics: a critical review and future perspectives. Metabolomics, 2009;5(1):3. An excellent review that connected environmental metabolomics with ecophysiological studies on the metabolic responses to temperature, water, food availability, light and circadian rhythms, atmospheric gases and season among others.

  7. Viant MR. Applications of metabolomics to the environmental sciences. Metabolomics. 2009;5:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0157-3.

  8. Lin CY, Viant MR, Tjeerdema R. Metabolomics: methodologies and applications in the environmental sciences. J Pest Sci. 2006;31(3):245–51.

  9. Brunetti C, George RM, Tattini M, Field K, Davey MP. Metabolomics in plant environmental physiology. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(13):4011–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Viant MR. Recent developments in environmental metabolomics. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4(10):980–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Djoumbou-Feunang Y, Fiamoncini J, Gil-de-la-Fuente A, Greiner R, Manach C, Wishart DS. BioTransformer: a comprehensive computational tool for small molecule metabolism prediction and metabolite identification. J Cheminform. 2019;11(1):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Viant MR. Environmental metabolomics using 91 H-NMR spectroscopy. Environmental Genomics. 2005;137–150. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-548-0_9.

  13. Majumdar RD, Akhter M, Fortier-McGill B, Soong R, Liaghati-Mobarhan Y, Simpson AJ, et al. In vivo solution-state NMR-based environmental metabolomics. eMagRes. 2007;133–48.

  14. • Viant MR, Sommer UJM. Mass spectrometry based environmental metabolomics: a primer and review. Metabolomics. 2013;9(1):144–58. This review introduces the use of targeted and non-targeted LC-MS and GC-MS based environmental metabolomics tools and approaches.

  15. Lankadurai BP, Nagato EG, Simpson MJ. Environmental metabolomics: an emerging approach to study organism responses to environmental stressors. Environmental Reviews. 2013;21(3):180–205.

  16. Viant MR, Bearden DW, Bundy JG, Burton IW, Collette TW, Ekman DR, et al. International NMR-based environmental metabolomics intercomparison exercise. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;43(1):219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hines A, Oladiran GS, Bignell JP, Stentiford GD, Viant MR, Technology. Direct sampling of organisms from the field and knowledge of their phenotype: key recommendations for environmental metabolomics. Environ Sci Technol 2007;41(9):3375–3381.

  18. Morrison N, Bearden D, Bundy JG, Collette T, Currie F, Davey MP, et al. Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: environmental context. Metabolomics. 2007;3(3):203–10.

  19. Miller MG. Environmental metabolomics: a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats). J Proteome Res. 2007;6(2):540–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Misra BB. Bring out your data: a call for community standards and the archiving of exposomics datasets. Anal Sci. 2016. https://theanalyticalscientist.com/techniques-tools/bring-out-your-data.

  21. Juarez PD, Matthews-Juarez P. Applying an exposome-wide (ExWAS) approach to cancer research. Front Oncol. 2018;8.

  22. Wang Y, Hua L, Jiang J, Xie Y, Hou K, Li Q, et al. High-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with dynamic purge-injection for rapid analysis of volatile metabolites in urine. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1008:74–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. • Shelley JT, Badal SP, Engelhard C, Hayen HJ. Ambient desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: evolution from rapid qualitative screening to accurate quantification tool. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410:4061–76. A must read review for the most recent trends and developments in ambient desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (ADI-MS)- from concepts to applications.

  24. Nunome Y, Kodama K, Ueki Y, Yoshiie R, Naruse I, Wagatsuma K. Development of soft ionization using direct current pulse glow discharge plasma source in mass spectrometry for volatile organic compounds analysis. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc. 2018;139:44–9.

  25. Rivas-Ubach A, Liu Y, Steiner AL, Sardans J, Tfaily MM, Kulkarni G, et al. Atmo-ecometabolomics: a novel atmospheric particle chemical characterization methodology for ecological research. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191(2):78.

  26. Southam AD, Lange A, Al-Salhi R, Hill EM, Tyler CR, Viant MR. Distinguishing between the metabolome and xenobiotic exposome in environmental field samples analysed by direct-infusion mass spectrometry based metabolomics and lipidomics. Metabolomics. 2014;10(6):1050–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Metz TO, Baker ES, Schymanski EL, Renslow RS, Thomas DG, Causon TJ, et al. Integrating ion mobility spectrometry into mass spectrometry-based exposome measurements: what can it add and how far can it go? Bioanalysis. 2017;9(1):81–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. • Carmona E, Picó Y. The use of chromatographic methods coupled to mass spectrometry for the study of emerging pollutants in the environment. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2018;48(4):305–16. This manuscript reviewed and compared various studies dealing with analytical methods that capture emerging pollutants in the environment and shows the popular use of LC-MS and triple-quadrupole mass spectrometers in the majority of the studies.

  29. Trefz P, Schubert JK, Miekisch W. Effects of humidity, CO2 and O2 on real-time quantitation of breath biomarkers by means of PTR-ToF-MS. J Breath Res. 2018;12(2):026016.

  30. Sciarrone D, Schepis A, Zoccali M, Donato P, Vita F, Creti D, Alpi, A. and Mondello, L. Multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry/quadrupole MS with a low-bleed ionic liquid secondary column for the authentication of truffles and products containing truffle. Anal Chem 2018;90(11):6610–6617.

  31. Barczak RJ, Fisher RM, Wang X, Stuetz RM. Variations of odorous VOCs detected by different assessors via gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry and olfactory detection port (ODP) system. Water Sci Technol. 2018;77(3):759–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yan D, Wong YF, Whittock SP, Koutoulis A, Shellie RA, Marriott PJ. Sequential hybrid three-dimensional gas chromatography with accurate mass spectrometry: a novel tool for high-resolution characterization of multicomponent samples. Anal Chem. 2018;90(8):5264–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamaguchi MS, McCartney MM, Linderholm AL, Ebeler SE, Schivo M, Davis CE. Headspace sorptive extraction-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method to measure volatile emissions from human airway cell cultures. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018;1090:36–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reyes-Villegas E, Priestley M, Ting Y-C, Haslett S, Bannan T, Breton ML, Williams, P.I., Bacak, A., Flynn, M.J., Coe, H. and Percival, C. Simultaneous aerosol mass spectrometry and chemical ionisation mass spectrometry measurements during a biomass burning event in the UK: insights into nitrate chemistry. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 2018;18(6):4093–111.

  35. Soltow QA, Strobel FH, Mansfield KG, Wachtman L, Park Y, Jones DP. High-performance metabolic profiling with dual chromatography-Fourier-transform mass spectrometry (DC-FTMS) for study of the exposome. Metabolomics. 2013;9(1):132–43.

  36. Singh KD, del Miguel GV, Gaugg MT, Ibañez AJ, Zenobi R, Kohler M, et al. Translating secondary electrospray ionization–high-resolution mass spectrometry to the clinical environment.J Breath Res. 2018;12(2):027113.

  37. Bannier M, Van De Kant K, Baumbach J, Jobsis Q, Dompeling E. Exhaled breath analysis by ion mobility spectrometry in children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. Eur Respiratory Soc. 2018;52:PA4613.

  38. Blair SL, Ng NL, Zambrzycki SC, Li A, Fernández FM. Aerosol vacuum-assisted plasma ionization (Aero-VaPI) coupled to ion mobility-mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2018;29(4):635–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Misra BB, Bassey E, Bishop AC, Kusel DT, Cox LA, Olivier M. High resolution GC/MS metabolomics of non-human primate serum, Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2018;32(17):1497–1506.

  40. Hayward DG, Archer JC, Andrews S, Fairchild RD, Gentry J, Jenkins R, et al. Application of a high-resolution quadrupole/orbital trapping mass spectrometer coupled to a gas chromatograph for the determination of persistent organic pollutants in cow’s and human milk. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(44):11823–9.

  41. Hollender J, Schymanski EL, Singer HP, Ferguson PL. Nontarget screening with high resolution mass spectrometry in the environment: ready to go? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(20):11505–11512.

  42. •• Oberacher H, Reinstadler V, Kreidl M, Stravs M, Hollender J, Schymanski E. Annotating nontargeted LC-HRMS/MS data with two complementary tandem mass spectral libraries. Metabolites. 2019;9(1):3. This study addressed the comparability of two LC-HRMS/MS platforms, i.e., QqTOF vs. Orbitrap for evaluation of 233 compounds rapid and high-confidence tentative identifications in complex human and environmental samples. They further demonstrate the inter-laboratory comparability of the results.

  43. Alygizakis NA, Samanipour S, Hollender J, Ibáñez M, Kaserzon S, Kokkali V, et al. Exploring the potential of a global emerging contaminant early warning network through the use of retrospective suspect screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(9):5135–44.

  44. •• Hu M, Müller E, Schymanski EL, Ruttkies C, Schulze T, Brack W, et al. Performance of combined fragmentation and retention prediction for the identification of organic micropollutants by LC-HRMS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018;410(7):1931–41. This research study demonstrated that for LC-HRMS/MS exploration of micropollutant structural elucidations, both fragmenter tools (MetFrag and CFM-ID) performed well for most compounds and that ESI+ mode mass spectra were better for further structural elucidation.

  45. Schollée JE, Schymanski EL, Stravs MA, Gulde R, Thomaidis NS, Hollender J. Similarity of high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry spectra of structurally related micropollutants and transformation products. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017;28(12):2692–704.

  46. Moschet C, Anumol T, Lew BM, Bennett DH, Young TM. Household dust as a repository of chemical accumulation: new insights from a comprehensive high-resolution mass spectrometric study. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(5):2878–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tang C, Tan J. Quasi-targeted analysis of halogenated organic pollutants in fly ash, soil, ambient air and flue gas using gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry with isotopologue distribution comparison and predicted retention time alignment. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1555:74–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Alexandrino GL, Tomasi G, Kienhuis P, Augusto F, Christensen JH. Forensic investigations of diesel oil spills in the environment using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry and chemometrics: new perspectives in the absence of recalcitrant biomarkers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;53(1):550–559.

  49. Heschl K, Haas-Baumann N, Weber R, Baghdasaryan A, Micic SJ, Singer F, et al. Identification of disease specific biomarkers by exhalomics using secondary electrospray ionisation high-resolution mass spectrometry (SESI-HRMS) in children with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir Soc. 2018;52:PA3411.

  50. Misra BB. New tools and resources in metabolomics: 2016-2017. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(7):909–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Misra BB, Fahrmann JF, Grapov D. Review of emerging metabolomic tools and resources: 2015-2016. Electrophoresis. 2017;38(18):2257–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. • Misra BB, Langefeld CD, Olivier M, Cox LA. Integrated omics: tools, advances, and future approaches. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018; 62(1):R21–R45. This updated review summarizes the current state of the art in the integrated -omics, also known as multi-omics/ poly-omics/ trans-omics popularly, in terms of tools, approaches/ methods, and applications in the basic and biomedical research domains.

  53. Misra BB, van der Hooft JJ. Updates in metabolomics tools and resources: 2014-2015. Electrophoresis. 2016;37(1):86–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. • Misra BB, Mohapatra S. Tools and resources for metabolomics research community: a 2017–2018 update. Electrophoresis. 2018;40(2):227–246. This review provides a summary of all the tools, softwares, resources and databases developed/ updated/ released in 2017-2018 for conducing NMR and MS-based metabolomics research.

  55. Kikuchi J, Ito K, Date Y. Environmental metabolomics with data science for investigating ecosystem homeostasis. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2018;104:56–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Longnecker K, Futrelle J, Coburn E, Soule MCK, Kujawinski EB. Environmental metabolomics: databases and tools for data analysis. Mar Chem. 2015;177:366–73.

  57. •• Rattray NJ, Deziel NC, Wallach JD, Khan SA, Vasiliou V, Ioannidis JP, et al. Beyond genomics: understanding exposotypes through metabolomics. Human genomics. 2018;12(1):4. This critical review discusses the application of big data in environmental health studies, current challenges in the approach, analytical biases and biological variability, and calls for MWAS studies through open science frame works.

  58. Bonvallot N, David A, Chalmel F, Chevrier C, Cordier S, Cravedi J-P, et al. Metabolomics as a powerful tool to decipher the biological effects of environmental contaminants in humans. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018;8:48–56.

  59. He Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Cheng H, Liu XJ. Stereoselective bioaccumulation of chiral PCB 91 in earthworm and its metabolomic and lipidomic responses. Environ Pollut. 2018;238:421–30.

  60. Lee S-W, Chatterjee N, Im J-E, Yoon D, Kim S, Choi J, et al. Integrated approach of eco-epigenetics and eco-metabolomics on the stress response of bisphenol-A exposure in the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;163:111–6.

  61. •• Rodríguez-Moro G, Ramírez-Acosta S, Arias-Borrego A, García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL. Environmental Metallomics. Metallomics: Springer; 2018. p. 39–66. This updated book chapter introduces the importance of environmental metallomics and the current state of the art, i.e., analytical strategies and platforms available for capturing the metallome.

  62. • Schymanski EL, Williams AJ. Open science for identifying “known unknown” chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(10):5357–5359. This short viewpoint article proposes approaches for confirmation of known unknown chemicals in environmental research using HRMS platforms, chemical data curation and open science efforts.

  63. Dionisio KL, Phillips K, Price PS, Grulke CM, Williams A, Biryol D, et al. The Chemical and Products Database, a resource for exposure-relevant data on chemicals in consumer products. Sci. Data. 2018;5:180125.

  64. Peisl L, Schymanski EL, Wilmes P. Dark matter in host-microbiome metabolomics: tackling the unknowns–a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1037:13–27.

  65. • Bloszies CS, Fiehn O. Using untargeted metabolomics for detecting exposome compounds. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018;8:87–92. This review highlights the growing role of exposomics studies, the importance of untargeted mass spectrometry in capturing the exposome, and the challenges associated with compound identification in these efforts.

  66. Vinaixa M, Schymanski EL, Neumann S, Navarro M, Salek RM, Yanes O. Mass spectral databases for LC/MS-and GC/MS-based metabolomics: state of the field and future prospects. Trends Analyt Chem. 2016;78:23–35.

  67. Ulrich EM, Sobus JR, Grulke CM, Richard AM, Newton SR, Strynar MJ, et al. EPA’s non-targeted analysis collaborative trial (ENTACT): genesis, design, and initial findings. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;411(4):1–14.

  68. • Wang M, Carver JJ, Phelan VV, Sanchez LM, Garg N, Peng Y, et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with global natural products social molecular networking. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(8):828–37. This pioneering research study, introduced and demonstrated the importance of spectral data sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking leading to improved annotations and identification of unknowns.

  69. Bouslimani A, Porto C, Rath CM, Wang M, Guo Y, Gonzalez A, et al. Molecular cartography of the human skin surface in 3D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(17):E2120-E9.

  70. • Bouslimani A, Melnik AV, Xu Z, Amir A, da Silva RR, Wang M, et al. Lifestyle chemistries from phones for individual profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(48):E7645-E54. This research study demonstrated the capability of high resolution mass spectrometry and molecular cartography in exploring the personal space (habitat) for recapitulating an individual's life history, i.e., diet, medication, exposures, microbiome among others.

  71. Kapono CA, Morton JT, Bouslimani A, Melnik AV, Orlinsky K, Knaan TL, et al. Creating a 3D microbial and chemical snapshot of a human habitat. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):3669.

  72. Petras D, Nothias L-Fl, Quinn RA, Alexandrov T, Bandeira N, Bouslimani A, et al. Mass spectrometry-based visualization of molecules associated with human habitats. Anal. Chem. 2016;88(22):10775–84.

  73. • McEachran AD, Mansouri K, Grulke C, Schymanski EL, Ruttkies C, Williams AJ. “MS-Ready” structures for non-targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry screening studies. J Cheminform. 2018;10(1):45. This research study developed a Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME) workflow to help produce structural representations observed using HRMS ("MS-Ready structures") and linked them to those stored in databases and are made available from the US EPA's Chemistry Dashboard.

  74. • Allen F, Pon A, Wilson M, Greiner R, Wishart D. CFM-ID: a web server for annotation, spectrum prediction and metabolite identification from tandem mass spectra. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(W1):W94–W9. This study reported a new web server, CFM-ID for annotation, spectrum prediction and metabolite identification from MS/MS data, thus proving to be important for future untargeted tandem mass-spectrometry based explorations of the exposome.

  75. Laponogov I, Sadawi N, Galea D, Mirnezami R, Veselkov KA. ChemDistiller: an engine for metabolite annotation in mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(12):2096–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Dührkop K, Shen H, Meusel M, Rousu J, Böcker S. Searching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI: FingerID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(41):12580–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Jaeger C, Méret M, Schmitt CA, Lisec J. Compound annotation in liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry based metabolomics: robust adduct ion determination as a prerequisite to structure prediction in electrospray ionization mass spectra. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31(15):1261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Ridder L, van der Hooft JJ, Verhoeven S. Automatic compound annotation from mass spectrometry data using MAGMa. Mass Spectrom. 2014;3(Special_Issue_2):S0033-S0033.

  79. •• Ruttkies C, Schymanski EL, Wolf S, Hollender J, Neumann S. MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation. J Cheminform. 2016;8(1):3. This research endeavor introduced MetFrag 2.2 to the research community, with improvements and strategies for interpretation of tandem mass spectral data, and demonstrated it with a validation dataset comprised of HR-MS/MS spectra.

  80. van Der Hooft JJJ, Wandy J, Barrett MP, Burgess KE, Rogers S. Topic modeling for untargeted substructure exploration in metabolomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(48):13738–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. •• Tsugawa H, Kind T, Nakabayashi R, Yukihira D, Tanaka W, Cajka T, et al. Hydrogen rearrangement rules: computational MS/MS fragmentation and structure elucidation using MS-FINDER software. Anal. Chem. 2016;88(16):7946–58. This article introduced MS-FINDER, a software for structural elucidation from tandem mass spectrometry data, where molecular formulas of precursor ions are determined from accurate mass, isotope ratio, and product ion information.

  82. Mistrik R, mzCLOUD: A spectral tree library for the Identification of" unknown unknowns". Abstr Pap Am Chem S. (Vol. 255) 2018. Amer Chemical Soc 1155 16th st, NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA.

  83. •• Little JL, Williams AJ, Pshenichnov A, Tkachenko V. Identification of “known unknowns” utilizing accurate mass data and ChemSpider. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2012;23(1):179–85. In this innovative research effort, for the identification of "known unknowns" the use of accurate mass data from Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) and web-based version of SciFinder was proposed and demonstrated as proof of concept using LC-MS and GC-MS generated datasets.

  84. •• Neveu V, Moussy A, Rouaix H, Wedekind R, Pon A, Knox C, et al. Exposome-Explorer: a manually-curated database on biomarkers of exposure to dietary and environmental factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45(D1):D979–D984. This research reports the single largest database ddeidcated to biomarkers of exposure to environmental risk factors based on 480 publications that were analyzed and 10 510 concentration values in blood, urine and other biospecimens for 692 dietary and pollutant biomarkers are reported.

  85. Wishart D. FooDB. 2016;469:470. [http://foodb.ca/]

  86. Horai H, Arita M, Kanaya S, Nihei Y, Ikeda T, Suwa K, et al. MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45(7):703–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. •• Blaženović I, Kind T, Sa MR, Ji J, Vaniya A, Wancewicz B, et al. Structure annotation of all mass spectra in untargeted metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(3):155–2162. In this innovative study, the researchers used urine metabolomics datasets to eventually annotate ALL metabolites detected by untargeted metabolomics assays using integrative efforts that used tandem mass-spectrometry data and tools such as CarniBlast, CSI:FingerID, and the new NIST hybrid search for the very first time.

  88. Warth B, Spangler S, Fang M, Johnson CH, Forsberg EM, Granados A, et al. Exposome-scale investigations guided by global metabolomics, pathway analysis, and cognitive computing. Anal. Chem. 2017;89(21):11505–13.

  89. López-Pérez JL, Therón R, del Olmo E, Díaz DJB. NAPROC-13: a database for the dereplication of natural product mixtures in bioassay-guided protocols. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(23):3256–7.

  90. Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG. The NIST Chemistry WebBook: a chemical data resource on the internet. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2001;46(5):1059–63.

  91. Steinbeck C, Kuhn SJP. NMRShiftDB–compound identification and structure elucidation support through a free community-built web database. Phytochemistry. 2004;65(19):2711–7.

  92. Rothwell JA, Perez-Jimenez J, Neveu V, Medina-Remon A, M'Hiri N, García-Lobato P, et al. Phenol-Explorer 3.0: a major update of the Phenol-Explorer database to incorporate data on the effects of food processing on polyphenol content. Database. 2013;2013.

  93. Sawada Y, Nakabayashi R, Yamada Y, Suzuki M, Sato M, Sakata A, et al. RIKEN tandem mass spectral database (ReSpect) for phytochemicals: a plant-specific MS/MS-based data resource and database. Phytochemistry. 2012;82:38–45.

  94. • Wandy J, Zhu Y, van der Hooft JJ, Daly R, Barrett MP, Rogers S. Ms2lda. org: web-based topic modelling for substructure discovery in mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics. 2017;34(2):317–8. In this research, an innovative web-based effort ms2lda.org, was introduced that allows users to upload their data, run MS2LDA analyses and explore the results through interactive visualizations for sets of molecular fragment data from large-scale untargeted metabolomics studies.

  95. Böcker S, Dührkop K. Fragmentation trees reloaded. J Cheminform. 2016;8(1):5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Mohimani H, Gurevich A, Shlemov A, Mikheenko A, Korobeynikov A, Cao L, et al. Dereplication of microbial metabolites through database search of mass spectra. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Misra BB. Plant volatilome resources. Curr Metabolomics. 2016;4(2):148–50.

  98. Choi H, McAuley MT, Lawrence DA. Prenatal exposures and exposomics of asthma. Aims Environ Sci. 2015;2(1):87–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Fiorito G, Vlaanderen J, Polidoro S, Gulliver J, Galassi C, Ranzi A, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the effect of air pollution on cardio- and cerebrovascular disease: a prospective study in nonsmokers. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2018;59(3):234–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Jeong A, Fiorito G, Keski-Rahkonen P, Imboden M, Kiss A, Robinot N, et al. Perturbation of metabolic pathways mediates the association of air pollutants with asthma and cardiovascular diseases. Environ Int. 2018;119:334–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. de la Monte SM, Tong M, Wands JR. The 20-year voyage aboard the journal of Alzheimer's disease: docking at 'Type 3 Diabetes', environmental/exposure factors, pathogenic mechanisms, and potential treatments. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):1381–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Goldfarb DS. The exposome for kidney stones. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(1):3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Smith MT, Zhang LP, McHale CM, Skibola CF, Rappaport SM. Benzene, the exposome and future investigations of leukemia etiology. Chem Biol Interact. 2011;192(1–2):155–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the developers of the tools, databases, and in silico resources who help enrich the exposomics and metabolomics research community with their relentless efforts and to complement the efforts in rapid analytical tools development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswapriya B. Misra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Human Health Effects of Environmental Pollution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misra, B.B. Metabolomics Tools to Study Links Between Pollution and Human Health: an Exposomics Perspective. Curr Pollution Rep 5, 93–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00109-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-00109-4

Keywords

Navigation