Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of nanoparticles in single-lap composite joints studied by experimental and numerical analyses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on the strength of single-lap nanocomposite joints. Three different types of specimens were studied, each of which contained 1 wt% of carbon nanotube in the adhesive. The adherends included three different percentages of nanoclays, namely 0, 5 and 7 wt%. The material used here was glass fibers/epoxy, with epoxy as the matrix. After fabrication of the laminates, they were stuck together by epoxy resin containing 1 wt% of carbon nanotube. Different tests were also conducted to analyze the specimens. These tests included X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and tensile test. In the XRD test, the presence of glass fiber, epoxy resin and nanoclays was verified and in the SEM test, the distribution of nanoclays into the laminates was investigated and finally the strength of the joints with different nanoparticles was examined by tensile test. In addition, a finite element (FE) analysis was also incorporated and the results of this method were verified by the experimental results. To perform the FE analysis, Young’s modulus of the laminates and the adhesive were both required. Therefore, a tensile test was conducted to obtain the Young’s modulus of the adherends and the elastic modulus of adhesive was obtained from the data existing in the literature. Finally, the results from FE analysis and the experimental tests were compared with each other and a good agreement was observed. It was finally concluded that the specimen comprised of 5 wt% nanoclays had the best performance among the three.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim KS, Yoo JS, Yi YM, Kim CG (2006) Failure mode and strength of uni-directional composite single-lap bonded joints with different bonding methods. Compos Struct 72:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beylergil B, Cunedioglu Y, Aktas A (2011) Experimental and numerical analysis of single lap composite joints with inter-adherend fibers. Compos Part B 42:1885–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li R, Huong N, Crosky A, Mouritz AP, Kelly D, Chang P (2009) Improving bearing performance of composite bolted joints using z-pins. Compos Sci Technol 69:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsuzaki R, Shibata M, Todoroki A (2008) Reinforcing an aluminum/GFRP co-cured single lap joint using inter-adherend fiber. Compos Part A 39:786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuzaki R, Shibata M, Todoroki A (2008) Improving performance of GFRP/aluminum single lap joints using bolted/co-cured hybrid method. Compos Part A 39:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park YB, Song MG, Kim JJ, Kweon JH, Choi JH (2010) Strength of carbon/epoxy composite single-lap bonded joints in various environmental conditions. Compos Struct 92:2173–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira JAM, Reis PN, Costa JDM, Richardson MOW (2002) Fatigue behaviour of composite adhesive lap joints. Compos Sci Technol 62:1373–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reis PNB, Ferreira JM, Richardson MOW (2012) Effect of the surface preparation on PP reinforced glass fibre adhesive lap joints strength. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker BM (1986) Some effects of moisture on adhesive-bonded CFRP–CFRP joints. Compos Struct 6:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker BM (1990) The strength of bonded carbon fibre composite joints exposed to high humidity. Int J Adhes Adhes 10:187–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ashcroft IA, Hughes DJ, Shaw SJ (2000) Adhesive bonding of fiber reinforced polymer composite materials. Assem Autom 20:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Vassilopoulos AP, Keller T (2009) Environmental effects on fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded structural joints. Compos Sci Technol 69:1022–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Srivastava VK (2011) Effect of carbon nanotubes on the strength of adhesive lap joints of C/C and C/C–SiC ceramic fibre composites. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:486–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsai MY, Morton J, Matthews FL (1995) Experimental and numerical studies of a laminated composite single-lap ddhesive joint. J Compos Mater 29:1254–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang TP, Mallick PK (1998) Effect of spew geometry on stresses in single-lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 18:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang P, Mouritz AP, Cox BN (2008) Elevated temperature properties of pinned composite lap joints. J Compos Mater 42:741–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang P, Mouritz AP, Cox BN (2006) Properties and failure mechanisms of pinned composite lap joints in monotonic and cyclic tension. Compos Sci Technol 66:2163–2176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kairouz KC, Matthews FL (1993) Strength and failure modes of bonded single-lap joints between cross-ply adherends. Composites 24:475–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vinson JR, Sierakowski RL (2002) The behavior of structures composed of composite materials. KLUWER Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Gent AN, Lin CW (1990) Model studies of the effect of surface roughness and mechanical interlocking on adhesion. J Adhes 32:113–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao Q (2000) Modeling and characterization of interfacial adhesion and fracture. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology

  22. Kim WS, Yun IH, Lee JJ, Jung HT (2010) Evaluation of mechanical interlock effect on adhesion strength of polymer–metal interfaces using micro-patterned surface topography. Int J Adhes Adhes 30:408–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park SJ, Jin JS, Lee JR (2000) Influence of silane coupling agents on the surface energetics of glass fibers and mechanical interfacial properties of glass fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Sci Technol 14:1677–1689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feller JF, Grohens Y (2004) Coupling ability of silane grafted poly(propene) at glass fibers/poly(propene) interface. Compos Part A 35:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinloch AJ (1980) The science of adhesion, part I—surface and interfacial aspects. J Mater Sci 15:2141–2166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo Y, Zhao Y, Cai J, Duan Y, Du S (2012) Effect of amino-functionalization on the interfacial adhesion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/epoxy nanocomposites. Mater Des 33:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorigato A, Morandi S, Pegoretti A (2012) Effect of nanoclay addition on the fiber/matrix adhesion in epoxy/glass composites. J Compos Mater 46:1439–1451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Horn RG, Smith DT (1992) Contact electrification and adhesion between dissimilar materials. Science 256:362–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dickinson JT, Jensen LC, Lee S, Scudiero L, Langford SC (1994) Fracto-emission and electrical transients due to interfacial failure. J Adhes Sci Technol 8:1285–1309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Voyutskii SS, Vakula VL (1963) The role of diffusion phenomena in polymer-to-polymer adhesion. J Appl Polym Sci 7:475–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Niu S, Cai S, Liu T, Zhao H, Wang X, Ren M, Huang K, Wu X (2015) 45S5 bioactive glass-ceramic coated magnesium alloy with strong interfacial bonding strength by superplasticity diffusion bonding. Mater Lett 141:96–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gude MR, Prolongo SG, Rio TG, Urena A (2011) Mode-I adhesive fracture energy of carbon fibre composite joints with nanoreinforced epoxy adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:695–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mylavarapu P, Woldesenbet E (2010) Effect of nanoclay incorporation on the impact properties of adhesively bonded composite structures. J Adhes Sci Technol 24:389–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Khalili SMR, Tavakolian M, Sarabi A (2010) Mechanical properties of nanoclay reinforced epoxy adhesive bonded joints made with composite materials. J Adhes Sci Technol 24:1917–1928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fereidoon A, Kordani N, Rostamiyan Y, Ganji DD, Ahangari MG (2010) Effect of carbon nanotube on adhesion strength of E-glass/epoxy composite and alloy aluminuim surface. World Appl Sci J 9:204–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Montazeri A, Javadpour J, Khavandi A, Tcharkhtchi A, Mohajeri A (2010) Mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Mater Des 31:4202–4208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen QT, Baird DG (2007) An improved technique for exfoliating and dispersing nanoclay particles into polymer matrices using supercritical carbon dioxide. Polymer 48:6923–6933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Kordani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagheri, M.R., Sadough Vanini, S.A., Kordani, N. et al. The effect of nanoparticles in single-lap composite joints studied by experimental and numerical analyses. Iran Polym J 24, 629–640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0351-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0351-2

Keywords

Navigation