Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing a Restorable Wetland Index for Rainwater Basin Wetlands in South-Central Nebraska: A Multi-Criteria Spatial Analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 August 2012

Abstract

It is always challenging for decision makers to prioritize wetland conservation programs at the landscape scale. This study employed a GIS-based multi-criteria spatial decision support tool that identified locations with the highest restoration potential for wetland conservation programs in the Rainwater Basin in south-central Nebraska. Five indicators were considered to assess wetland restoration potential: (1) Vegetation characteristics; (2) Soil characteristics; (3) Water volume released from hydrological modification of agricultural irrigation pits; (4) Topographical depression status; and (5) Habitat condition. The results suggested 192 (1.6 % of the total) hydric soil footprints as the highest prioritized locations for future wetland restoration programs. The results also identified 901 footprints (7.7 % of the total) with medium-high restoration potential, 1,792 (15.2 % of the total) footprints with medium-low restorable potential and 8,875 (75.5 % of the total) footprints with low restorable potential. The methodology and statistical results contribute directly to the state’s Rainwater Basin Wetland Program Plan and are potentially applicable to the management of other wetlands across the region and globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abruzzes B, Leibowitz SG (1997) A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental Management 21:457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford BA (1996) The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop AA (2010) 2004–2009 Summary of habitat distribution and abundance throughout the Rainwater Basin wetland complex, U.S. fish and wildlife service, habitat and population evaluation team, Rainwater Basin joint venture

  • Bishop AA, Vrtiska M (2008) Effects of the wetland reserve program on waterfowl carrying capacity in the Rainwater Basin Region of South-Central Nebraska. A conservation effects assessment project wildlife component assessment

  • Carver S (1991a) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information system. International Journal of Geographic Information System 5:321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver S (1991b) Site Search and multi-criteria evaluation. Planning Outlook 34(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedfeldt PT, Watzin MC, Richardson BD (2000) Using GIS to identify functionally significant wetlands in the Northeastern United States. Environmental Management 26:13–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl T (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998–2004. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical report Y-87-1. Vicksburg, MS., U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station

  • Fennessy MS, Jacobs AD, Kentula ME (2007) An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27:543–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan NE, Richardson CJ (2010) A multi-scale approach to prioritize wetland restoration for watershed-level water quality improvement. Wetlands Ecology and Management 18:695–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsh SM, van der Valk AG, Budelsky RA (1998) Decision-making for prairie wetland restorations. Great Plains Research 8:137–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukos DA, Smith LM (1994) The importance of playa wetlands to biodiversity of the Southern High Plains. Landscape and Urban Planning 28:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton PR (1995) Statistics explained: a guide for social science students. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs AD, Kentula ME, Herlihy AT (2010) Developing an index of wetland condition from ecological data: an example using HGM functional variables from the Nanticoke watershed, USA. Ecological Indicators 10:703–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman-Axlrod JL, Steinberg SJ (2010) Development and application of an automated GIS based evaluation to prioritize wetland restoration opportunities. Wetlands 30:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman D, Kupper L, Muller K (1988) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer L, Elliott M (2005) Identification of conservation opportunity areas in Georgia. GAP Analysis Bulletin 13:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange TG (1997) Guide to Nebraska’s Wetlands and their conservation needs. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange TG, Stutheit R, Gilbert M, Shurtliff D, Whited PM (2011) Sedimentation of Nebraska’s Playa Wetlands: a review of current knowledge and issues. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, p 62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JP, Kleiss BA (2007) A wetland restoration spatial decision support system for the Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, ERDC/FL TR-07-12

  • Liu C, Frasier P, Kumar L, Macgregor C (2006) Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision making method TOPIS. Environmental Management 38:316–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, pp 578–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2008) Dreams of natural streams. Science 319:291–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, p 322

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein HI (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, pp 447–541

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Hara CG, Davis AA, Kleiss BA (2000) A decision support system for prioritizing forested wetland restoration in the Yazoo Backwater Area, Mississippi, Water Resources Investigation Report 00-4199, U.S. Geological survey

  • O’Neill MP, Schmidt JC, Dohbrowolski JP, Hawkins CP, Neale CMU (1997) Identifying sites for riparian wetland restoration: application of a model to the Upper Arkansas River Basin. Restoration Ecology 5:85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possingham HP, Ball I, Andelman S (2000) Mathematical methods for reserve system design. In: Freson S, Burgman M (eds) Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer, New York, pp 291–267

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaux RM (2010) Correlating climate with late-winter wetland habitat in the Rainwater Basin, South-Central Nebraska, Master Thesis, Kansas State University

  • Robichaux RM, Harrington LMB (2009) Environmental conditions, irrigation reuse pits, and the need for restoration in the Rain Water Basin Wetland Complex, Nebraska. Papers of the Applied Geography Conferences 32:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell GD, Hawkins CP, O’Neill MP (1997) The role of GIS in selecting sites for riparian restoration based on hydrology and land use. Restoration Ecology 5:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simenstad C, Reed D, Ford M (2006) When is restoration not? Incorporating landscape-scale processes to restore self-sustaining ecosystems in coastal wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering 26:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Starks PJ (1984) Analysis of rainbasin depressions of Clay County, Nebraska, M.A., Thesis, Department of Geology/Geography, University of Nebraska-Omaha

  • Stein ED, Dark S, Longcore T, Grossinger R, Hall N, Beland M (2010) Historical ecology as a tool for assessing landscape change and informing wetland restoration priorities. Wetlands 30:589–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer GD, Sasser CE, Visser JM, Swenson EM, Nyman JA, Raynie RC (2003) A proposed coast-wide reference monitoring system for evaluating wetland restoration trajectories in Louisiana. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81:107–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stralberg D, Applegate DL, Phillips SJ, Herzog MP, Nur N, Warnock N (2009) Optimizing wetland restoration and management for avian communities using a mixed integer programming approach. Biological Conservation 142:94–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutheit RG, Gilbert MC, Whited PM, Lawrence KL (2004) A regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of Rainwater Basin depressional wetlands in Nebraska. ERDC/EL TR-04-4, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (1987) Soil-vegetation correlations in the sandhills and Rainwater Basin Wetlands of Nebraska. Biol Rep 87(11), September 1987, U.S. Fish and wildlife service, U.S. Department of the Interior

  • USNRCS (U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2008) The Wetland reserve program supports migrating waterfowl in Nebraska’s Rainwater Basin Region, CEAP conservation insight, September 2008

  • Voss K (2007) Mead Lake watershed wetland assessment project: developing wetland landscape metrics for effective planning and adapting the Milwaukee River basin approach for a small agricultural watershed, Final Report to U.S. EPA- Region V. Wetland Grant # CD 96511801

  • White D, Fennessy S (2005) Modeling the suitability of wetland restoration potential at the watershed scale. Ecological Engineering 24:359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was support by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Grant ID: #CD97723501) and the Grant-In-Aid funds. None of the conclusions expressed here necessarily reflects views other than those of the authors. The research team sincerely appreciated the great support from the Rainwater Bain Joint Venture and the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. The authors really appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and help in improving an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Zhenghong Tang, Xu Li, Nan Zhao, Ruopu Li & Edwin F. Harvey

Authors
  1. Zhenghong Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruopu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edwin F. Harvey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenghong Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, Z., Li, X., Zhao, N. et al. Developing a Restorable Wetland Index for Rainwater Basin Wetlands in South-Central Nebraska: A Multi-Criteria Spatial Analysis. Wetlands 32, 975–984 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0320-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0320-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation