Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Solution of the mixed integer large scale unit commitment problem by means of a continuous Stochastic linear programming model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power Systems all around the World faced in the last decade a large increase of penetration of power generation produced by Renewable Energy Sources, a large part of which (in particular wind generation and solar generation) is affected by high levels of uncertainty. Being Renewable Energy Sources only partially controllable all this uncertainty is transferred into Power System operation. Thus, numerical simulation of Power Systems needs to be able to cope with this uncertainty, that is Stochastic Programming techniques have to be considered. Anyway, numerical simulation of Power Systems also involves a very large number of variables, some of which are of integer nature: a large scale mixed integer stochastic problem has thus to be solved, but the requirement in computational power and time could reveal to be far too large. Thus, heuristic procedures must be introduced. In this paper it is introduced the sMTSIM model, based on a Stochastic continuous relaxation of the mixed integer Unit Commitment problem and on an heuristic procedure capable of re-introducing the mixed integer constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Actually, reservoir hydro power plants in Italy are thousands; thus we aggregated all the reservoirs located in the same zone and belonging to the same Company in one equivalent plant.

  2. In this continuous formulation an overestimation of the reserve is possible: in fact, if unit’s status could be considered, unit \(g\) could never produce less than \(\underline{p}^G_g\); then, \(p^G_{g,t} \le \underline{p}^G_g\) could also mean that the unit should be turned off, in which case there would be no contribution to reserve; this mathematical trick contributes in reducing the error in the evaluation of reserve.

  3. It is possible to define \(\underline{E}\) in many different ways; usually, \(\underline{E}=N_g \cdot \overline{p}^G_g\), with \(N_g\) an integer parameter defined by the user.

  4. Constraint on reserve could not be met in case of lack of energy.

  5. This profile can be one of the RES generation scenarios used in the Stochastic model as well as a completely new one.

  6. It includes the generators that bid and compete to be dispatched to sell energy in the Italian day-ahead zonal electricity market. Production of generators having dispatching priority (such as renewable sources, CHP, other incentivized generation) is simply subtracted by the load.

References

  1. Takriti, S., Birge, J.R., Long, E.: A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 11(3), 1497–1508 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dentcheva, D., Römish, W.: Optimal power generation under uncertainty via Stochastic Programming. In: Marti, K., Kall, P. (eds.) Stochastic Programming Methods and Technical Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, pp. 22–56, Springer, Berlin (1998)

  3. Padhy, N.P.: Unit Commitment—a bibliographical survey. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(2), 1196–1205 (May 2004)

  4. Carøe, C.C., Schultz, R.: A Two-Stage Stochastic Program for Unit Commitment Under Uncertainty in a Hydro-Thermal Power System, PREPRINT SC 98–11, KONRAD-ZUSE-ZENTRUM FUR INFORMATIONSTECHNIK (1998)

  5. Parvania, M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., Aminifar, F., Abiri-Jaromi, A.: Reliability-Constrained Unit Commitment using Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming, IEEE PMAPS 2010, June 14th–17th (2010)

  6. Barth, R., Brand, H., Meibom, P., Weber, C.: A Stochastic Unit-commitment Model for the Evaluation of the Impacts of Integration of Large Amounts of Intermittent Wind Power, IEEE PMAPS 2006, June 11th–15th, Stockholm (2006)

  7. Constantinescu, E.M., Zavala, V.M., Rocklin, M., Lee, S., Anitescu, M.: A computational framework for uncertainty quantification and Stochastic optimization in Unit Commitment with wind power generation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(1), 431–441 (Feb. 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Restrepo, J.F., Galiana, F.D.: Assessing the yearly impact of wind power through a new hybrid deterministic/Stochastic Unit Commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(1), 401–410 (Feb. 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carrión, M., Arroyo, J.M.: A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21(3), 1371–1378 (Aug. 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. http://tinyurl.com/odxepsc

  11. http://www.terna.it/default/Home/SISTEMA_ELETTRICO/mercato_elettrico/zone_di_mercato.aspx

  12. http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/solvers/cplex.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Siface.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siface, D., Vespucci, M.T. & Gelmini, A. Solution of the mixed integer large scale unit commitment problem by means of a continuous Stochastic linear programming model. Energy Syst 5, 269–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-013-0107-z

Keywords

Navigation