Skip to main content
Log in

Suspicious calcifications in benign breast lesions: a radio-pathologic correlation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer screening by mammography (MMG) has recently increased in Japan. Suspicious lesions are therefore being detected more and more by MMG and the number of benign biopsies is increasing. It is thus important to examine which pathologically benign lesions were read as suspicious on MMG to reduce the number of biopsies in the case of benign breast lesions.

Methods

Of 299 category 3 or 4 lesions on MMG, 39 histologically benign lesions with calcification were reviewed and compared with the mammograms by a pathologist and a radiologist. The Japan Mammography Guidelines were used for MMG interpretation.

Results

In mastopathy lesions, small round segmental calcifications and pleomorphic clustered calcifications were assessed as suspicious. The suspicious type of calcification in fibroadenoma was small round clustered. The calcifications in fibroadenoma may be seen as small round when the fibroadenoma is rather young, and assessed as suspicious.

Conclusions

Some types of calcifications in mastopathy and fibroadenoma were assessed as borderline by MMG. We should therefore collect data from more benign cases with suspicious calcifications on MMG and elucidate the diagnostic criteria in MMG findings of such calcifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masuda N, Sawai K, Okazaki K, Ito S, Kinugawa H, Kubouchi K, et al. Current status and future problems with breast cancer screening. The symposium II at the 14th annual meeting of the Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2005;14:113–76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer NJB, Evans AJ, Galea M, Sibbering DM, Yeoman LJ, Pinder SE, et al. Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:853–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Committee of Mammography Guidelines (Japan Radiological Society Japanese Society of Radiological Technology), editors. Mammography guidelines (in Japanese). Tokyo: Igaku Syoin; 2004.

  4. Uematsu T. Problems arising from differences between Japanese and American (Original) BI-RADS (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2006;15:191–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcification. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological correlations. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tse G, Tan P-H, Pang A, Tang A, Cheung H. Calcification in breast lesions: pathologists’ perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:145–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Masuda N. Atlas of benign breast diseases on mammography for the discrimination from malignancy (in Japanese). Geka Chiryo. 2006;95:494–503.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Research from the National Hospital Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rieko Nishimura.

About this article

Cite this article

Nishimura, R., Taira, N., Sugata, S. et al. Suspicious calcifications in benign breast lesions: a radio-pathologic correlation. Breast Cancer 18, 33–36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0199-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-010-0199-4

Keywords

Navigation