Skip to main content
Log in

Traditional Knowledge, Use, and Management of Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) in Amazonian Peru

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional Knowledge, Use, and Management ofAphandra natalia(Arecaceae) in Amazonian Peru. Along the Pastaza and Urituyacu rivers in Peru, 100 informants in four villages knew 17 different uses of the piassaba fiber palm, Aphandra natalia (Balslev and Henderson) Barfod. Human consumption of fruits, extraction of fibers for trade, and harvesting leaves for thatch were the most frequently reported uses. Twenty uses were documented previously in the literature, and eight are reported here for the first time. Knowledge concerning the use of A. natalia among villagers varied significantly with ethnicity, village, and gender, but not with education or age; Amerindian informants knew more than non-Amerindian informants, and men knew more than women. Old and young informants knew about the same numbers of uses, and those who had little formal school training knew as many as those who had attended school for a longer time. Although 44% of our informants knew about fiber extraction, trade involving Aphandra fibers was not of great economic importance in our study area. Because fiber extraction has been documented as the most important use in all previous studies of A. natalia, it was surprising to find that people in one of the studied villages did not use A. natalia for that purpose at all. In contrast to previous observations, the extraction of fibers involved the destructive felling of the palms. We recommend implementing non-destructive extraction techniques so that local communities could exploit the fiber resource in a sustainable way. Non-destructive extraction methods involve cutting leaves from standing palms instead of felling the entire tree and leaving a few leaves on each extracted palm. However, given the limited economic incentive to the extractor, market mechanisms may be the greatest barrier to implementing sustainable extraction techniques.

Conocimientos tradicionales, uso, y manejo de Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) en la Amazonía del Perú. A lo largo de los ríos Pastaza y Urituyacu en Perú, 100 informantes en cuatro comunidades conocían 17 usos diferentes de la palma piasaba, Aphandra natalia (Balslev & Henderson) Barfod. El consumo humano de sus frutos, extracción de fibras para su venta, y la cosecha de hojas para techar las casas, eran los usos mas frecuentemente reportados. Anteriormente se conocían 20 usos de esta palma y ocho usos están reportadas por primera vez en esta publicación. El conocimiento tradicional relacionado con el uso de A. natalia en las comunidades estudiadas fue significativamente variable en cuanto a etnicidad, comunidad, y género, pero no en cuanto a educación y edad. Informantes indígenas sabían más que informantes no-indígenas y los hombres sabían más que las mujeres. Informantes jóvenes y de mayor edad conocían el mismo número de usos de la piasaba y los que tenían pocos años de estudios escolares conocían el mismo número de usos que los que habían atendido colegio por más años. Aunque 44% de los informantes tenían conocimiento de la extracción de las fibra de piasaba, el negocio con la fibra no era de gran importancia en las comunidades visitadas. En todos los estudios anteriores de A. natalia, la extracción de fibra ha sido reportada como el uso más importante. Sin embargo, en una de las comunidades estudiadas ese uso de la palma no era conocido. En contraste a observaciones anteriores, la extracción de fibra se llevó a cabo con métodos destructivos, tumbando la palma. Recomendamos la implementación de tecnicas de extracción no-destructivas para que el uso de este recurso sea sostenible. Las técnicas no-destructivas dejan 5–6 hojas en la palma cosechada, sin tumbarla. Sin embargo, los incentivos económicos a los que cosechan la fibra son muy limitados, por lo cual los mecanismos del mercado pueden ser la barrera mas importantes para la implementación de técnicas sostenibles de extracción de este recurso.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Balslev, H. and A. Barfod. 1987. Ecuadorean Palms—An Overview. Opera Botanica 92:17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and A. Henderson. 1987. A New Ammandra (Palmae) from Ecuador. Systematic Botany 12:501–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, C. Grandez, N. Y. P. Zambrana, A. L. Møller, and S. L. Hansen. 2008. Palmas (Arecaceae) útiles en los alrededores de Iquitos, Amazonia Peruana. [Useful Palms (Arecaceae) near Iquitos, Peruvian Amazon]. Revista Peruana de Biología 15(Suppl. 1):121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, B. F., E. Cevallos, M. Santana, A. Rosales, and M. Graf. 2000. Losing Knowledge about Plant Use in the Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54:183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boll, T., J.-C. Svenning, J. Vormisto, S. Normand, C. Grandez, and H. Balslev. 2005. Spatial Distribution and Environmental Preferences of the Piassaba Palm Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) along the Pastaza and Urituyacu Rivers in Peru. Forest Ecology and Management 213:175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgtoft Pedersen, H. 1992. Uses and Management of Aphandra natalia (Palmae) in Ecuador. Bulletin del’Institute Française d’Etudes Andines 21:741–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Production and Harvest of Fibers from Aphandra natalia (Palmae) in Ecuador. Forest Ecology and Management 80:155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— and H. Balslev. 1990a. The Economic Botany of Ecuadorean Palms. Pages 173–191 in M. Plotkin and L. Famalore, eds., Sustainable Harvest and Marketing of Rain Forest Products. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and ———. 1990b. Ecuadorean Palms for Agroforestry. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byg, A. and H. Balslev. 2004. Factors Affecting Local Knowledge of Palms in Nangaritza Valley in South-eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ethnobiology 24(2):255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, J. Vormisto, and H. Balslev. 2007. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(3):631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, M. T. and C. Ehringhaus. 2003. Plant Virtues Are in the Eyes of the Beholders: A Comparison of Known Palm Uses among Indigenous and Folk Communities of Southwestern Amazonia. Economic Botany 57:324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, O. T. and B. L. Barham. 1997. Rain Forest Extraction and Conservation in Amazonia. The Geographical Journal 163:180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, F. Grimard, and G. J. Burt. 2000. Tropical Forests and Shifting Cultivation: Secondary Forest Fallow Dynamics among Traditional Farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 32:109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Torre, L., H. Navarrete, P. Muriel M., M. J. Macía, and H. Balslev, eds. 2008. Enciclopedia de las Plantas Útiles del Ecuador. Herbario QCA de la Escuela de Cienecias Biológicas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, and Herbario AAU del Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad de Aarhus, Aarhus.

  • Figueiredo, G. M., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1993. Ethnobotany of Atlantic Forest Coastal Communities: Diversity of Plant Uses in Gamboa (Itacuruçá Island, Brazil). Human Ecology 21:419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., H. Overman, J. Demmer, L. Apaza, E. Byron, T. Huanca, W. Leonard, E. Pérez, V. Reyes-García, V. Vadez, D. Wilkie, A. Cubas, K. McSweeney, and N. Brokaw. 2002. Local Financial Benefits of Rain Forests: Comparative Evidence from Amerindian Societies in Bolivia and Honduras. Ecological Economics 40:397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, C. C. and J. Salick. 2003. Yanesha Agriculture in the Upper Peruvian Amazon: Persistence and Change Fifteen Years down the “Road”. Economic Botany 57:163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazaki, N., J. Y. Tamashiro, H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 2000. Diversity of Plant Uses in Two Caiçara Communities from the Atlantic Forest Coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:597–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, M., C. Grandez, E. Ferreira, and H. Balslev. 2008. Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae)—A Little Known Source of Piassaba Fibers from the Western Amazon. Revista Peruana de Biología 15(Suppl. 1):103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda, L. D., D. S. D. Araujo, R. Cerqueria, and B. Turcq. 1984. Restingas: Origem, estrutura, processos. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macía, M. J. 2004. Multiplicity in Palm Uses by the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 144:149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normand, S., J. Vormisto, J.-C. Svenning, C. Grandez, and H. Balslev. 2006. Geographical and Environmental Controls of Palm Beta Diversity in Paleo-Riverine Terrace Forests in Amazonian Peru. Plant Ecology 186:161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrault-Archambault, M. and O. T. Coomes. 2008. Distribution of Agrobiodiversity in Home Gardens along the Corrientes River, Peruvian Amazon. Economic Botany 62:109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S. G. and R. T. Walker. 2002. Household Life Cycles and Secondary Forest Cover among Small Farm Colonists in the Amazon. World Development 30:1009–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. M., A. H. Gentry, and R. O. Mendelsohn. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian Rainforest. Nature 339:655–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. and A. H. Gentry. 1993. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, P., L. Luz, and I. R. Swingland. 2002. The Faint Promise of a Distant Market: A Survey of Belém’s Trade in Non-timber Forest Products. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:515–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ticktin, T. 2004. The Ecological Implications of Harvesting Non-timber Forest Products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrana, N. Y. P., A. Byg, J.-C. Svenning, M. Moraes, C. Grandez, and H. Balslev. 2007. Diversity of Palm Uses in the Western Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:2771–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our work on palms is supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council via grants to HB (272-06-0476). We thank the villagers in Sungachi, Velasco, Reforma, and Guineal for their hospitality. Fieldwork for this study was supported by a grant from the Danida Research Council to HB (104.Dan.8-764) and grants from the Faculty of Science, Aarhus University, to MK and TRK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Balslev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balslev, H., Knudsen, T.R., Byg, A. et al. Traditional Knowledge, Use, and Management of Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) in Amazonian Peru. Econ Bot 64, 55–67 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9105-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-009-9105-4

Key Words

Navigation