Skip to main content
Log in

Political science perspectives on transportation security

  • Published:
Journal of Transportation Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article identifies some key issues for new research in transportation security from a political science perspective: network-centric security thinking; infrastructure vulnerability; the dilemma of public/private operation of security screening; policy coordination and market failure; and intermodal security. We argue of the importance of the ‘homeland security dilemma’: the more governments and corporations spend on security, the greater the perception of failure in the event of a low-probability disaster event, hence the greater the risk of investment; consequently actors have an incentive to move transportation security off the public agenda and avoid spending on security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amoore L (2006) Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the war on terror. Polit Geogr 25(3):336–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreas P (2003) Redrawing the line: borders and security in the twenty-first century. Int Secur 28:278–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M, Watkins M (2005) Airline security, the failure of 9/11, and predictable surprises. Int Public Manag J 8(3):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett CJ (2008) Comparative politics of no-fly lists in the United States and Canada. In: Salter MB (eds) Politics at the airport. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis, 88–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo D (2002) Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives 27(16):3–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland TA (1997) After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland TA (2004) Learning and policy improvement after disaster. Am Behav Sci 48(3):341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SE, Chenoweth E (2006) The politics of vulnerability: constructing local performance regimes for homeland security. Rev Policy Research 23(1):95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox R (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium 10(2):126–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey PS (2003) Aviation security: the role of law in the war on terror. Columbia J Transnatl Law 41(3):649–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton D (1953) The political system. Alfred Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhefnawy N (2004) Societal complexity and diminishing returns in security. Int Secur 29(1):152–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson CW, Barratt BA (2004) Prudence or panic? Preparedness exercises, counterterror mobilization, and media coverage—dark winter, TOPOFF 1 and 2J. Homeland Security Emerg Manag 1(4):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn SE (2000) Beyond border control. Foreign Aff 79(6):57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn SE (2002) America: the vulnerable. Foreign Aff 81(1):60–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn SE (2004) The neglected home front. Foreign Aff 83(5)

  • Frederickson GH, LaporteTR (2002) Airport security, high reliability, and the problem of rationality. Public Admin Rev 62(Special issue):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hainmüller J, LemnitzerJM (2003) Why do Europeans fly safer? The politics of airport security in Europe and the US. Terrorism Polit Violence 15(4):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart–Rudman Commission (2001) U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century co-chaired by Gary Hart and Warren Rudman, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change: The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, February 15, 2001

  • Jervis R (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Polit 30(2):167–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettl D (2003) Contingent coordination: practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security. Am Rev Public Adm 33(3):253–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam C (2006) TOPOFF 3 report finds government unable to coordinate response to terrorist attacks. Biosecurity Bioterror 4(2):99–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell D (1958) Politics: who gets what, when, how. Meridian, Cleveland, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert R, O’Connor D (2003) Security assemblages: airport security, flexible work, and liberal governance. Alternatives 28(1):331–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D (2003) Airports as data filters: converging surveillance systems after September 11. Inf Commun Ethics Society 1(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller B (2004) (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizsh Stud 8(3):279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (2007a) Governmentalities of an Airport. Int Polit Sociol. 1(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (2007b) SeMS and sensibility: security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. J Air Transp Manag 13(6):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter MB (ed) (2008) Politics at the airport. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

  • Seidenstat P (2002) Terrorism, airport security, and the private sector. Public Admin Rev 21(1):275–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasiulis D, Ross D (2006) Security, flexible sovereignty, and the perils of multiple citizenship. Citizsh Stud 10(3):329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston V, Seidenstat P, Johnston EW (2006) Transportation security policyPlant. J Handbook of transportation policy and administration. Taylor and Francis, New York 525–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters W (2002) Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. Citizsh Stud. 6(3):265–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber J (2005) Network-centric security for Canada–US supply chains. Fraser Institute and Washington: Centre for Strategic and International StudiesVancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher M, Sutton B (1996) Governing global networks: international regimes for transportation and communications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark B. Salter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salter, M.B. Political science perspectives on transportation security. J Transp Secur 1, 29–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-007-0003-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-007-0003-7

Keywords

Navigation