Abstract
Due to the nanometer scale pore size and extremely low permeability of a shale matrix, traditional Darcy’s law can not exactly describe the combined gas transport mechanisms of viscous flow and Knudsen diffusion. Three transport models modified by the Darcy equation with apparent permeability are used to describe the combined gas transport mechanisms in ultra-tight porous media, the result shows that Knudsen diffusion has a great impact on the gas transport and Darcy’s law cannot be used in a shale matrix with a pore diameter less than 1 μm. A single porosity model and a double porosity model with consideration of the combined gas transport mechanisms are developed to evaluate the influence of gas transport mechanisms and fracture parameters respectively on shale gas production. The numerical results show that the gas production predicted by Darcy’s law is lower than that predicted with consideration of Knudsen diffusion and the tighter the shale matrix, the greater difference of the gas production estimates. In addition, the numerical simulation results indicate that shale fractures have a great impact on shale gas production. Shale gas cannot be produced economically without fractures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arogundade O and Sohrabi M. A review of recent developments and challenges in shale gas recovery. SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, 8–11 April 2012, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia (paper SPE 160869)
Barber R W and Emerson D R. Challenges in modeling gas-phase flow in microchannels: from slip to transition. Heat Transfer Engineering. 2006. 27(4): 3–12
Beskok A and Karniadakis G E. Report: a model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering. 1999. 3(1): 43–77
Bird R B, Stewart W E and Lightfoot E N. Transport Phenomena (2nd Edition). New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002
Bustin A M M, Bustin R M and Cui X. Importance of fabric on the production of gas shales. SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference, 10–12 February 2008, Keystone, Colorado, USA (paper SPE 114167)
Choi J G, Do D D and Do H D. Surface diffusion of adsorbed molecules in porous media: monolayer, multilayer, and capillary condensation regimes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2001. 40(19):4005–4031
Civan F. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media. Transport in Porous Media. 2010. 82(2): 375–384
Civan F, Rai C S and Sondergeld C H. Intrinsic shale permeability determined by pressure-pulse measurements using a multiple-mechanism apparent-gas-permeability non-Darcy model. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 19–22 September 2010, Florence, Italy (paper SPE 135087)
Civan F, Rai C S and Sondergeld C H. Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms. Transport in Porous Media. 2011. 86(3): 925–944
EIA. World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside the United States. Washington: U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2011
Florence F A, Rushing J, Newsham K E, et al. Improved permeability prediction relations for low permeability sands. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium, 16–18 April 2007, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. (paper SPE 107954)
Hill D G and Nelson C R. Gas productive fractured shales: an overview andupdate. Gas TIPS. 2000. 6(2): 4–13
Ho C K and Webb S W. Gas Transport in Porous Media. Netherlands: Springer. 2006
Javadpour F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 2009. 48(8): 16–21
Javadpour F, Fisher D and Unsworth M. Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 2007. 46(10): 55–61
Kast W and Hohenthanner C R. Mass transfer within the gas-phase of porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2000. 43(5): 807–823
Kazemi H, Merrill JR. L S, Porterfield K L, et al. Numerical simulation of water-oil flow in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal. 1976. 16(6): 317–326
Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 2009. 79(12): 848–861
Peaceman D W. Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation with nonsquare grid blocks and anisotropic permeability. SPE Journal. 1983. 23(3): 531–543
Vermylen J P. Geomechanical Studies of the Barnett Shale, Texas, USA. Palo Alto, California, USA: Stanford University. 2011
Warren J E and Root P J. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal. 1963. 3(3): 245–255
Zhang W M, Meng G and Wei X. A review on slip models for gas microflows. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 2012. 13(6): 845–882
Ziarani A S and Aguilera R. Knudsen’s permeability correction for tight porous media. Transport in Porous Media. 2012. 91(1): 239–260
Zou C, Zhu R, Wu S, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an example. Acta Petrolei Sinica. 2012. 33: 173–187 (inChinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, J., Sun, H., Fan, Dy. et al. Numerical simulation of gas transport mechanisms in tight shale gas reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 10, 528–537 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-013-0304-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-013-0304-3