Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Illicit Partners and Political Development: How Organized Crime Made the State

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional approaches to the relationship between states and criminal groups depict it as one of corruption. However, this overlooks the developmental aspect of some state-criminal group relationships. This paper identifies the types of relationships states and criminal groups can have, and the conditions under which they collaborate to achieve political and economic developmental goals. I first develop a typology of state-criminal group relationships deductively. Then, using archival and secondary sources, I evaluate four cases, each representing a different type of state-criminal group relationship. I find that, though corruption exists to some degree in all cases, when states criminalize markets due to domestic pressure, they are more likely to challenge the criminal groups that emerge as a matter of policy. Furthermore, when states criminalize markets because of international pressure, they are more likely to collaborate with the criminal groups that develop. This collaboration can take the form of economic development or political consolidation. I conclude that criminal groups emerge as a by-product of the statebuilding process, and can be incorporated into that same process later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Organized criminal groups are defined as durable organizations consisting of two or more people to profit from illicit activity.

References

  • ACG. Enclosure No. 1 to Dispatch No. 1384, November 30, 1931

  • ACG. Dispatch from Charles Allen, 867.114 Narcotics/570, April 28, 1932

  • Addens TJ. The distribution of opium cultivation and the trade in opium. Haarlem: J. Enschede en zonen; 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alapuro R. State and revolution in Finland. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Consulate. Illicit Narcotic Traffic (867.114 Narcotics/226). Izmir, Turkey: Herbert S Bursley; 1931.

  • American Consulate General (ACG). Dispatch from Charles Allen, 867.114 Narcotics/154, March 19, 1931

  • Andreas P. Smuggler nation: how illicit trade made America. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias E. The impacts of differential armed dominance of politics Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. St in Comp Int Dev. 2013;48(3):263–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates R. States and markets in tropical Africa: the political basis of agricultural policy. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach D, Pedersen RB. Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines: University of Michigan Press; 2013.

  • Bovenkerk F, Yeşilgöz Y. The Turkish mafia. Preston: Milo; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook T, Wakabayashi BT. Opium regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl K. Saariston salakujettajat. Keuruu: Otava; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell M. Trafficking networks and the Mexican drug war. Am Econ Rev. 2015;105(6):1738–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desroches FJ. Research on upper level drug trafficking: a review. J of Drug Issues. 2007;37(4):827–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey M. Illegal police protection and the market for stolen vehicles in Buenos Aires. J of Lat Am St. 2012;44(4):679–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertman T. Birth of the leviathan: building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans PB. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta D. The sicilian mafia: the business of private protection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garon S. The state and labor in modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • George A, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen A. Kieltolakirikollisuuden sosiaaliset verkostot. Helsingissä 1929–30; 2003

  • Helsingin Sanomat. No 17, EK-Valpo I, XXXIII 9, file 632, January 1, 1928

  • Hill P. The Japanese mafia: yakuza, law, and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings JM. The opium empire: Japanese imperialism and drug trafficking in Asia, 1895–1945. Westport: Praeger; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BD. Righteousness before revenue: the forgotten moral crusade against Indo-Chinese opium trade. J Drug Issues. 1975;5(4):304–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jussila O, Hentilä S, Nevakivi J. From grand duchy to a modern state: a political history of Finland since 1809. London: C Hurst & Company; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallenautio J. Finnish prohibition as an economic policy issue. Scand Econ Hist Rev. 1981;29(3):203–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan DE, Dubro A. Yakuza: Japan’s criminal underworld. London: Robert Hale; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby DG. A concise history of Finland. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knoellinger CE. Labor in Finland. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivu KL. In the shadow of the state: mafias and illicit markets. Comp Pol Studies. 2016;49(2):155–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT. An-arrgh-chy: the law and economics of pirate organization. J Pol Econ. 2007;115(6):1049–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessing B. Logics of violence in criminal war. J Conflict Res. 2015;59(8):1486–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi M. Of rule and revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupsha P. Transnational organized crime versus the nation-state. Transnational Organized Crime. 1996;2(1):21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä K, Viikari M. Notes on alcohol and the state. Acta Sociologica. 1997;20(2):155–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister WB. Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century: an international history. New York: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediratta R. Partners in crime. Foreign Affairs. May 2014

  • Meyer K, Parssinen TM. Webs of smoke: smugglers, warlords, spies, and the history of the international drug trade. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscow A. The merchants of heroin. New York: Dial Press; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk S. The Ottoman empire and European capitalism, 1820–1913: trade, investment, and production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parssinen TM. Secret passions, secret remedies: narcotic drugs in British society, 1820–1930. Manchester: Manchester University Pres; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel S. Mexico’s legacy of corruption. In: Godson R, editor. Menace to society: political-criminal collaboration around the world. London: Transaction Publishers; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullat R. Itämeren rutto: pirtun salakuljetusta vuosina 1919–1939. Kaleva: Oulu; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullat R, Pullat R. The Vodka Sea: comparative history of spirits smuggling in the Baltic Sea. J of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 2012;13(1):64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter P. Disorganized crime: the economics of the visible hand. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sariola S. Prohibition in Finland, 1919–1932: its background and consequences. Quarterly J of Studies on Alcohol. 1954;15(3):477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A. Government in transition. European Econ Rev. 1997;41(3):385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siniawer EM. Ruffians, yakuza, nationalists: the violent politics of modern Japan, 1860–1960. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siniawer EM. Befitting bedfellows: yakuza and the state in modern Japan. J of Social History. 2012;45(3):623–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder R, Duran-Martinez A. Does illegality breed violence? Drug trafficking and state-sponsored protection rackets. Crime, Law and Soc Change. 2009;52(3):253–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt H. The soveriegn state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkunen I. History of the Finnish temperance movement: temperance as a civic religion. Lewiston: Mellen Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoumi FE. Political economy and illegal drugs in Colombia. Boulder: Rienner; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedonantaja. No 164, EK-Valpo I, XXXIII 9, file 632, July 20, 1927

  • Tilly C. War making and state making as organized crime. In: Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T, editors. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985. p. 169–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly C. Coercion, capital and European states: AD 990–1990. Cambridge: Blackwell; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman D. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J of Public Econ. 2000;76(3):399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Centre for International Crime Prevention. Assessing transnational organized crime: results of a pilot survey of 40 selected organized criminal groups in 16 countries. Trends in Organized Crime. (2) (2000).

  • US State Department. Narcotics offenses reported in the Istanbul press during the period February 1, 1933 to April 30, 1933; 17003, Sec3-402, International Labor Social and Health Affairs, May 1933.

  • US State Department. Narcotics offenses reported in the Istanbul press during the period January 1, 1934 to March 31, 1934; 17003, Sec3-402, International Labor Social and Health Affairs, April 1934.

  • US State Department. Narcotics offenses reported in the Istanbul press during the period October 1, 1934 to December 31, 1934; 17003, Sec3-402. International Labor Social and Health Affairs, January 1935.

  • US State Department. Incoming telegram, 10485, January 28. International Labor Social and Health Affairs, 1946.

  • Van Duyne PC. The phantom and threat of organized crime. Crime Law Soc Chang. 1995;24(4):341–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varese F. The Russian mafia: private protection in a new market economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov V. Violent entrepreneurs: the use of force in the making of Russian capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Godson R. Anticipating organized and transnational crime. Crime Law Soc Chang. 2002;37(4):311–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle J. A very gradual suppression: a history of Turkish opium controls, 1933–1974. European J of Criminology. 2014;11(2):195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuorinen JH. The prohibition experiment in Finland. New York: Columbia University Press; 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitch D. Trafficking cocaine: Colombian drug entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. London: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers, as well as Christopher Day, Mala Htun, Tamara Kay, Eduardo Moncada, Jami Nelson-Nunez, Sara Niedzwiecki, Mark Peceny, William Reno, William Stanley, and Richard Wood for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Mexico, Social Sciences Rm 2048, MSC05 3070, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA

    Kendra L. Koivu

Authors
  1. Kendra L. Koivu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kendra L. Koivu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koivu, K.L. Illicit Partners and Political Development: How Organized Crime Made the State. St Comp Int Dev 53, 47–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9242-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9242-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation