Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Slave Religion, Slave Hiring, and the Incipient Proletarianization of Enslaved Black Labor: Developing Du Bois’ Thesis on Black Participation in the Civil War as a Revolution

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Journal of African American Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

WEB Du Bois argued that black participation in the US Civil War was “the largest and most successful slave revolt,” but he did not link the causative agents of black participation in the war to those that motivated other major slave revolts in the antebellum USA. In this essay, I focus on how two factors contributed to such revolts: (1) slave religion, which provided an ideological justification for overthrowing the slave system and mobile slave preachers to articulate it, and (2) the system of hiring out slaves—especially slave artisans, which increased their disaffection with the slave system, while expanding networks across plantations and rural and urban slave and free black communities. I argue that these two factors provided ideological motivation and institutional coordination for the antebellum revolts and for the slave revolt of the Civil War, as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For estimates of the number of black troops from northern and southern states, see Berlin et al. (1983).

  2. For Colburn (1994: 6), “revolution is the sudden, violent, and drastic substitution of one group governing a territorial political entity for another group formerly excluded from government, and an ensuing assault on state and society for the purpose of radically transforming society.” Also, see Goldstone (2001).

  3. Genovese (1981: 4–5) notes that “[b]y the end of the eighteenth century, the historical content of the slave revolts shifted decisively from attempts to secure freedom from slavery to attempts to overthrow slavery as a social system,” with “[t]he great black revolution in Saint-Domingue mark[ing] the turning point,” and “[t]he nineteenth century revolts in the Old South formed part of this epoch-making transformation in the relations of class and race in the Western Hemisphere.” Specifically, “the black demand for the abolition of slavery as a social system was something new and epoch-making” (p. xx).

  4. McPherson (1991: 35) argues that the revolutionary quality of the Civil War was the result of the “enlistment of black soldiers to fight and kill their former masters,” which impelled Lincoln to change his initial limited war aims to “the revolutionary goal of a new Union without slavery” (p. 34).

  5. He added: “Yet one would search current American histories almost in vain to find a clear statement or even faint recognition of these perfectly well-authenticated facts” (p. 717).

  6. Du Bois (1995 [1933]: 543) lamented that Marx did not focus “first hand upon the history of the American Negro” and concluded that Marxism “must be modified in the [US] and especially so far as the Negro group is concerned.”

  7. Starobin (1970: 89) highlights several revolts and conspiracies involving industrial slaves after Turner’s revolt, and while some may have been exaggerated by whites, actual cases such as the slave conspiracy in 1856 was “especially significant, since it involved industrial slaves almost exclusively.”

  8. Sidbury (1997: 88) rejects the claims that the revolt was rooted in “artisanal republicanism.”

  9. On whether Gabriel was hired out, contrast Egerton (1993: 24–5) and Sidbury (1997: 83).

  10. Interestingly, after escaping from Richmond, Gabriel was helped by a white boat captain and betrayed by a hired-out slave artisan. Gabriel and more than 30 other conspirators were hanged. In the aftermath, the legislature restricted slave hiring and limited the residency and movement of free blacks.

  11. Several authors—most prominently Johnson (2001)—have argued that the Vesey conspiracy was a fabrication of white politicians, but this claim has been challenged, most convincingly, by Spady (2011).

  12. A similar argument is made by Raboteau (1980: 163) and, more recently, Harris (2001), among others.

  13. Ironically, the key informant, George Wilson, was a blacksmith, a class leader in the AME church, and a founding member of the church (Pearson 1999; Robertson 1999).

  14. Oates (1975:161) argues that “[t]hose who describe Nat as a skilled slave are wrong. In 1822, Nat was valued at $400—the price of a good field hand. During his trial for insurrection, he was valued at only $375. By contrast, a slave blacksmith also tried for the rebellion was valued at $675. Moreover, Nat mentions nothing in the Confessions about ever being a skilled slave; rather, he refers to himself as a field hand at work behind his plow” (p. 38).

  15. Similar laws were enacted across the slave states, contributing to the vast illiteracy among slaves such that most slaves freed by the Civil War were illiterate.

  16. On networks, skilled labor, slave hiring, and religion, see Schermerhorn (2011).

  17. For a useful synthesis of discussions on enslaved artisan workers and networks of communication, see Buchanan (2004).

  18. The more formal clandestine networks, such as Webb describes, culminated in the Underground Railroad, which by the 1850s “had developed into a diverse, flexible, and interlocking system with thousands of activists residing from the upper South to Canada” (Bordewich 2005: 5).

References

  • Aptheker, H. (1966). Nat Turner’s slave revolt. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., Schoen, B., & Towers, F. (Eds.). (2011). The old South’s modern worlds: Slavery, region, and nation in the age of progress. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I., Reidy, J., & Rowland, L. (Eds.). (1983). The black military experience: A documentary history of emancipation, 1861-1867. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordewich, F. (2005). Bound for Canaan. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, P. (2003). A prophet in his own land. Support for Nat Turner and his rebellion within Southampton’s black community. In K. Greenberg (Ed.), Nat Turner: A slave rebellion in history and memory (pp. 103–118). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. (2004). Black life on the Mississippi: Slaves, free blacks, and the western steamboat world. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, F. (1994). The vogue of revolution in poor countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, M. W. (1988). A peculiar people: Slave religion and community—culture among the Gullahs. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, F. (1855). My bondage, my freedom. New York: Miller, Orton & Mulligan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1969 [1935]). Black Reconstruction in the United States, 1860-1880. New York: Atheneum.

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1985 [1936]). The Negro and social reconstruction. In H. Aptheker (Ed.), Against racism: unpublished essays, papers, addresses, 1887-1961 (pp. 103-159). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1995 [1933]). Marxism and the Negro problem. In D. Lewis (Ed.), W. E. B. Du Bois: a reader (pp. 538-44). New York: Henry Holt & Company.

  • Egerton, D. (1993). Gabriel’s rebellion. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, D. (2003). Nat Turner in a hemispheric context. In K. Greenberg (Ed.), Nat Turner: A slave rebellion in history and memory (pp. 134–147). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flournoy, H. W. (ed.) (1890). Calendar of Virginia State papers and other manuscripts, Vol. 9. Richmond, VA.

  • Franklin, V. P. (1992). Black self-determination: A cultural history of African-American resistance (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, Eugene (1981). From rebellion to revolution: Afro-American slave revolts in the making of the New World. New York: Vintage.

  • Glattharr, J. (1992). Black glory: The African-American role in Union victory. In G. Boritt (Ed.), Why the Confederacy lost (pp. 133–162). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. (2001). Towards a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H., & Hutchins, H. (2004). Slave badges and the slave-hire system in Charleston, South Carolina, 1783-1865. Jefferson: McFarland & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S. (1997). ‘Extravagant expectations’ of freedom: Rumour, political struggle, and the Christmas Insurrection Scare of 1865 in the American South. Past and Present 157 (November): 122–158.

  • Hahn, S. (2009). The political worlds of slavery and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F. (2001). Something within: Religion in African-American political activism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2001). Denmark Vesey and his co-conspirators. William and Mary Quarterly, 58(4), 915–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, A. (2007a). Joining places. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, A. (2007b). Neighborhoods and Nat Turner: the making of a slave rebel and the unmaking of a slave rebellion. Journal of the Early Republic, 27(Winter), 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L. (1978). Black culture and black consciousness: Afro-American folk thought from slavery to freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Litwack, L. (1980). Been in the storm so long. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofton, J. (1983). Denmark Vesey’s revolt: The slave plot that lit a fuse to Fort Sumter. Kent: Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2004). Divided mastery: Slave hiring in the American South. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurry, S. (2010). Confederate reckoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. (1991). Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. (1993). The Negro’s Civil War. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, W. (1993). Black Messiahs and Uncle Toms. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, G. (1972). Flight and rebellion: Slave resistance in eighteenth century Virginia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. (1995). The Longman guide to world affairs. White Plains: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, S. (2011). William Webb’s world. New York Times http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/18/william-webbs-world/.

  • Oates, S. (1975). The fires of jubilee. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parramore, T. (2003). Covenant in Jerusalem. In K. Greenberg (Ed.), Nat Turner: A slave rebellion in history and memory (pp. 58–76). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, E. (1999). Designs against Charleston: The trial record of the Denmark Vesey Slave Conspiracy of 1822. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  • Raboteau, A. (1980). Slave religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. (1999). Denmark Vesey. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. (1983). Black Marxism. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermerhorn, C. (2011). Money over mastery, family over freedom: Slavery in the antebellum upper South. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidbury, J. (1997). Ploughshares into swords: Race, rebellion and identity in Gabriel’s Virginia, 1730-1810. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidbury, J. (2003). Reading, revelation, and rebellion: The textual communities of Gabriel, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner. In K. Greenberg (Ed.), Nat Turner: A slave rebellion in history and memory (pp. 119–133). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, J. (2011). Power and confession: on the credibility of the earliest reports of the Denmark Vesey slave conspiracy. William and Mary Quarterly, 68(2), 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starobin, R. (1970). Industrial slavery in the old South. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobin, R. (Ed.). (1988). Blacks in bondage: Letters of American slaves. New York: Markus Weiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, S. (1987). Slave culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. (1873). The history of William Webb, composed by himself. Detroit: Egbert Heokstra. Reprinted by Academic Affairs Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore, G. (1983). Black religion and black radicalism. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Clovis Semmes, Wilson Moses, Anthony Kaye, Andrew Zimmerman, Gregory Downs, Steven Hahn, Crystal Sanders, Muhammad Ahmad, Haki Madhubuti, Cedric Robinson, Robert Packer, Frank Reid, Akua Njeri, James Taylor, Scott Brown, Rebecka Rutledge Fisher, Matthew Isham, Kelly Knight, Mack Jones, Michael Griggs, Teferi Brent, Asha Bandele and William Blair for their suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. Special thanks to the faculty, staff, and students of the Richards Civil War Era Center at Penn State University for the supportive environment they’ve provided for my research; and to Rev. Frank Reid and the congregants of Bethel AME Church in Baltimore, Rev. Wendell Anthony and the congregants of Fellowship Chapel in Detroit, and Charles Ferrell of the Liberation Film Series at Charles Wright Museum of African American History in Detroit for providing venues to present this work and continuous inspiration to carry it out. This essay is dedicated to my former professor at the University of Michigan who encouraged me to engage WEB Du Bois’ research in Black Reconstruction in this way: Professor Harold Cruse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Errol A. Henderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, E.A. Slave Religion, Slave Hiring, and the Incipient Proletarianization of Enslaved Black Labor: Developing Du Bois’ Thesis on Black Participation in the Civil War as a Revolution. J Afr Am St 19, 192–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-015-9299-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-015-9299-8

Keywords

Navigation