Abstract
Objective
To find out the psychosocial factors associated with adolescent sexual behavior.
Methods
A cross sectional study was carried out in Chandigarh Union Territory of India by enrolling 11th class students from six randomly selected schools. A pre-tested questionnaire containing 83 items was administered after ensuring privacy and confidentiality. Socio-economic status, residence, gender, grade in the class, religion, acculturation level, self esteem, social support and coping behavior were considered as independent explanatory variables and physical sexual contact (which included kissing, hugging and sexual intercourse) was taken as dependent variable.
Results
Two hundred and fifty seven students enrolled for the study had mean age of 17 yr. The prevalence of sexual activity was 20% (95% CI: 13.6%–28.1%) among males and 6% (95% CI: 1.3%–18.8%) among females. Four percent of males and 1% of females reported sexual intercourse. The main reason for not having sexual physical contact was societal norms. After adjusting for confounders in multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 3.5; 95%CI: 1.5–8.1) and modern attitudes (OR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.6–0.98) were found to be the risk factors for initiation of sexual activity in adolescence.
Conclusion
Cultural norms rather than the individual/psychological factors tend to govern adolescent sexual behavior in Indian society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham L, Kumar K. Sexual experiences and their correlates among college students in Mumbai city, India. International Family Planning Perspectives 1999; 25: 139–46 and 152
Werner-Wilson RJ. Gender differences in adolescent sexual attitudes: the influence of individual and family factors. Adolescence 1998; 33: 519–531.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Expanding the global response to HIV/AIDS through focused action. Reducing risk and vulnerability: definitions, rationale and pathways. UNAIDS Information Center, Geneva, 1998
Rosenberg M. Self esteem scale. In Rosenberg M, ed. Society and the Adolescent Image. NJ: Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1965; 17–18.
Nehra R, Kulhara P. Development of a scale for assessment of social support: Initial tryout in an Indian setting. Indian J Social Psychiatry 1987; 3: 353–359.
Cooper CL, Faragher EB. Coping strategies and breast disorders/cancer. Psycholog Med 1992; 22: 447–445.
Jeejebhoy SJ. Adolescent sexual and reproductive behaviour: A review of the evidence from India. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 1275–1290.
Paul C, Fitzjohn J, Herbison P, Dickson N. The determinants of sexual intercourse before the age 16. J Adolesc Health 2000; 27: 136–147.
Pinter B, Timori M. Sexual behaviour of secondary school students in Slovenia. Eur J Contarcept Reprod Health Care 2000; 5: 71–76.
Vingilis ER, Wade TJ, Seeley JS. Predictors of adolescent self related health. Analysis of National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health 2002; 93: 193–197.
Sharma A, Sehgal VN, Kant S, Chawla SC. Knowledge, attitude survey of rural adolescents. Proceedings of 10 th AIDS International Conference, Yokohoma, Japan. August 7–12, 1994; 10: 383.
Basu R, Deva RP, Grover V et al. ICMR Task Force Study. Reproductive health awareness and sexual behaviour of adolescents and parents’/teachers’ views. Paper presented in ICMR — Ford Foundation National Workshop on reproductive Health Care and Research: Issues and Perspectives held at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. November 13, 2000.
Resnick MD, Blum RW. The association of consensual sexual intercourse during childhood with adolescent health risk and behaviours. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 907–913.
Cocker AL, Richter DL, Valois DF, McKeown RE, Garrison CZ, Vincent ML. Correlates and consequences of early initiation of sexual intercourse. J School Health 1994; 64: 372–377.
Paul C, Fitzjohn J, Eberhart-Phillips J, Herbison P, Dickson N. Sexual abstinence at age 21 in New Zealand: The importance of religion. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1–10.
Lammers C, Ireland M, Resnick M, Blum R. Influences on adolescents’ decision to postpone onset of sexual intercourse: a survival analysis of virginity among youths aged 13 to 18 years. J Adolesc Health 2000; 26: 42–48.
Halpern CT, Joyner K, Udry JR, Suchindran C. Smart teens don’t have sex (or kiss much either). J Adolesc Health 2000; 26: 213–215.
Benson MD, Torpy EJ. Sexual behaviour in junior high school students. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 279–284.
Spencer JM, Zimet GD, Aalsma MC, Orr DP. Self — esteem as a predictor for initial coitus in early adolescents. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 581–584.
Carvajal SC, Parcel GS, Banspach SW et al. Psychosocial predictors of delay of first sexual intercourse by adolescents. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 443–452.
Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 1997; 278: 823–832.
Sieving RE, McNeely CS, Blum RW. Maternal expectations, mother-child connectedness, and adolescent sexual debut. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 809–816.
Felton GM, Bartoces M. Predictors of initiation of early sex in black and white adolescent females. Public Health Nurs 2002; 19: 59–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lakshmi, P.V.M., Gupta, N. & Kumar, R. Psychosocial predictors of adolescent sexual behavior. Indian J Pediatr 74, 923–926 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0170-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0170-3