Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical relevance of diagnosing vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment

  • Published:
Current Osteoporosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low bone mineral density and the presence of vertebral fractures are independent predictors for future vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Combining the conventional measurement of bone mineral density of spine and hips with the morphometry of the thoracal and lumbar vertebrae on lateral images using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanners, a technique called vertebral fracture assessment, facilitates detection of vertebral fractures in those patients at older age and with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Particularly, the finding of one or more vertebral deformities in patients with osteopenia is clinically important, because this might prompt the start of anti-osteoporotic treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, et al.: Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 1999, 353:878–882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ: Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 1992, 7:221–227.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oleksik AM, Ewing S, Shen W, et al.: Impact of incident vertebral fractures on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:861–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al.: The prevalence of vertebral deformity in european men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11:1010–1018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17:716–724.

  6. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, et al.: Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15:993–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orstavik RE, Haugeberg G, Mowinckel P, et al.: Vertebral deformities in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with population-based controls. Arch Intern Med 2004, 164:420–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bultink IE, Lems WF, Kostense PJ, et al.: Prevalence of and risk factors for low bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2044–2050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vosse D, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, et al.: Ankylosing spondylitis and the risk of fracture: results from a large primary care-based nested case control study. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, Dec 9 (Epub ahead of print).

  10. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al.: Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15:721–739.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, et al.: Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:821–828.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C, et al.: Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 2001, 12:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al.: Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 2001, 285:320–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oleksik A, Ott SM, Vedi S, et al.: Bone structure in patients with low bone mineral density with or without vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15:1368–1375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen ND, Jones G, et al.: Asymptomatic vertebral deformity as a major risk factor for subsequent fractures and mortality: a long-term prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:1349–1355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lems WF: Clinical relevance of vertebral fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK: A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1991, 6:25–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Delmas PD, Langerijt van de L, Watts NB, et al.: Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:557–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, et al.: Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11:577–582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lems WF: Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoids: effects on bone quality. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 56:3518–3522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiu S, Rao DS, Palnitkar S, Parfitt AM: Reduced iliac cancellous osteocyte density in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2003, 18:1657–1663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA: Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 2000, 3:281–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, et al.: Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual X-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2001, 4:373–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, et al.: Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 2004, 164:1108–1112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Netelenbos JC, Lems WF, Geusens PP, et al.: Spine radiographs to improve the identification of women at high risk for fractures. Osteoporos Int 2008 Nov 28 (Epub ahead of print).

  26. Koolhaas W, Prak A, Stiekema HM, et al.: Efficient and improved diagnosis of osteoporosis by simultaneous bone density measurement and spinal morphometry. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008, 152:938–943.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hospers IC, van der Laan JG, Zeebregts CJ, et al.: Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Supine Position: Comparison by Using Conventional Semiquantitative Radiography and Visual Radiography. Radiology 2009, 251:822–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khosla S, Melton LJ III: Clinical practice. Osteopenia. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:2293–2300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM, et al.: Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11:660–668.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chapurlat RD, Duboeuf F, Marion-Audibert HO, et al.: Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1189–1195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schousboe JT, Debold CR: Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:281–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vosse D, Heijckmann C, Landewe R, et al.: Comparing morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and radiography in defining vertebral wedge fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007, 46:1667–1671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology 3A64, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Marleen S. van Brussel

Authors
  1. Marleen S. van Brussel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willem F. Lems
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marleen S. van Brussel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Brussel, M.S., Lems, W.F. Clinical relevance of diagnosing vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7, 103–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-009-0017-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-009-0017-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation