Abstract
This work investigates a method for pre-screening material systems for selective laser sintering using a combination of revolution powder analysis (RPA) and machine learning. To develop this method, nylon was mixed with alumina or carbon fibers in different wt.% to form material systems with varying flowability. The materials were measured in a custom RPA device and the results compared with as-spread layer density and surface roughness. Machine learning was used to attempt classification of all powders for each method. Ultimately, it was found that the RPA method is able to reliably classify powders based on their flowability, but as-spread layer density and surface roughness were not able to be classified.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
10 µm step size, ×200 magnification, 5 × 5 stitching (57 mm2 total area)
Dry-mixed in a high-shear blender (Chulux QF-TB159008) for 10 min; alumina: (Almatis A16 SG, d50 = 0.5 µm), nylon: PA12 (ALM PA650 d50 = 55 µm); mixture sieved to < 250 µm
Dry-mixed in high-shear blender (Chulux QF-TB159008) for 10 min. Nylon: PA12 (ALM PA650 d50=55 µm), carbon fibers: (Zoltek PX-30 avg. length=100 µm, avg. width=7 µm).
References
J.A.H. de Jong, A.C. Hoffmann, and H.J. Finkers, Chem. Eng. Prog. N. Y. 95(4), 25. (1999).
P. Karapatis, A Sub-Process Approach of Selective Laser Sintering, Dissertation, EPFL, Lausanne (2002)
A. Amado, M. Schmid, G. Levy, and K. Wegener, Advances in SLS Powder Characterization, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Institute of Technology, Zurich (2011)
M. Schmid, Laser Sintering with Plastics: Technology, Processes, and Materials (Carl Hanser, München, 2018) https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569906842.
L. Verbelen, S. Dadbakhsh, M. Van den Eynde, J.-P. Kruth, B. Goderis, and P. Van Puyvelde, Eur. Polym. J. 75, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.12.014 (2016).
M. Van den Eynde, L. Verbelen, and P. Van Puyvelde, Powder Technol. 286, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.08.004 (2015).
I. de Oliveira, F. Vernilli, R. Vieira, and J.V.L. da Silva, Powder Technol. 356, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.003 (2019).
ASTM D7181-20. ASTM (2020). [Online]. https://compass.astm.org/download/D7181.30127.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2020
S. Siegelmeier and F. Wollecke, Characterizing the bulk and flow behaviour of LS polymer powders, SFF, Austin (2013). [Online]. https://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2013/2013-28-Ziegelmeier.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2019
A. Santomaso, P. Lazzaro, and P. Canu, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58(13), 2857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00137-4 (2003).
M. Van den Eynde, L. Verbelen, and P. Van Puyvelde, Influence of temperature on the flowability of polymer powders in laser sintering, in AIP Conference Lyon, France (2017), p. 190007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016796
J. Deckers, J.-P. Kruth, K. Shahzad, and J. Vleugels, CIRP Ann. 61(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.032 (2012).
R.M. German and A. Bose, Injection Molding of Metals and Ceramics (Princeton, MPIF, 1997).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by ExxonMobil through its membership in The University of Texas at Austin Energy Institute and by Phase II funding from NAVAIR STTR topic N18A-T008 (Additive Manufacturing for Naval Aircraft Battery Applications), Contract Number N68335-19-C-0578.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sassaman, D., Phillips, T., Milroy, C. et al. A Method for Predicting Powder Flowability for Selective Laser Sintering. JOM 74, 1102–1110 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05050-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05050-w