Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Dynamic Model Updating Techniques: A State of the Art Review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a review of structural dynamic model updating techniques. Starting with a tutorial introduction of basic concepts of model updating, the paper reviews direct and iterative techniques of model updating along with their applications to real life systems. The main objective of this paper is to review the most widely applied model updating techniques so that beginners as well as practising engineers can appreciate, choose and then utilize the most suitable model updating technique for their customized application. Another objective is to highlight the current issues, applications and observations for further advancements in the field of model updating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2010) Distributed parameter model updating using the Karhunen-Loeve expansion. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. Proceedings of the first international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arora V, Singh SP, Kundra TK (2009) Finite element model updating with damping identification. J Sound Vib 324:1111–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora V, Singh SP, Kundra TK (2009) Damped model updating using complex updating parameters. J Sound Vib 320:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arora V, Singh SP, Kundra TK (2009) Comparative study of damped FE model updating methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:2113–2129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora V, Singh SP, Kundra TK (2009) Damped FE model updating using complex updating parameters: its use for dynamic design. J Sound Vib 324:350–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arora V (2011) Comparative study of finite element model updating methods. J Vib Control 17(13):2023–2029

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Atalla MJ, Inman DJ (1998) On model updating using neural networks. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(1):135–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bais RS, Gupta AK, Nakra BC, Kundra TK (2004) Studies in dynamic design of drilling machine using updated finite element models. Mech Mach Theory 39:1307–1320

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Baruch M (1978) Optimization procedure to correct stiffness and flexibility matrices using vibration tests. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 16(11):1208–1210

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Baruch M, Bar-Itzhack IY (1978) Optimal weighted orthogonalization of measured modes. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 16(4):346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Altunisik AC (2011) Finite element model updating effects on nonlinear seismic response of arch dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beattie CA, Smith SW (1992) Optimal matrix approximants in structural identification. J Optim Theory Appl 74(1):23–56

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Berman A (1979) Mass matrix correction using an incomplete set of measured modes. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 17:1147–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berman A, Nagy EJ (1983) Improvement of a large analytical model using test data. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 21:1168–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Besterfield DH, Besterfield-Michna C, Besterfield GH, Besterfield-Sacre M (1995) Total quality management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bucher I, Braun S (1993) The structural modification inverse problem: an exact solution. Mech Syst Signal Process 7(3):217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Butkewitsch S, Steffen VJ (2002) Shape optimization, model updating and empirical modeling applied to the design synthesis of a heavy truck side guard. Int J Solids Struct 39:4747–4771

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Caesar B (1986) Update and identification of dynamic mathematical models. Proceedings of the fourth international modal analysis conference. Los Angeles, USA, pp 394–401

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caesar B (1987) Updating system matrices using modal test data, In: proceedings of the fifth international modal analysis conference, London, UK, pp. 453–459

  21. Carvalho J, Datta BN, Gupta A, Lagadapati M (2007) A direct method for model updating with incomplete measured data and without spurious modes. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:2715–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakraborty S, Sen A (2014) Adaptive response surface based efficient finite element model updating. Finite Elem Anal Des 80:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang CC, Chang TYP, Xu YG (2000) Adaptive neural networks for model updating of structures. Smart Mater Struct 9:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chellini G, Roeck GD, Nardini L, Salvatore W (2010) Damage analysis of a steel-concrete composite frame by finite element model updating. J Constr Steel Res 66:398–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen JC, Garba JA (1980) Analytical model improvement using modal test results. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 18(6):684–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen JC, Kuo CP, Garba JA (1983) Direct structural parameter identification by modal test results. Proceedings of the 24th structural dynamics and materials conference. California, USA, pp 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  27. Collins JD, Hart GC, Hasselman TK, Kennedy B (1974) Statistical identification of structures. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 12(2):185–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunha J, Piranda J (1999) Application of model updating techniques in dynamics for the identification of elastic constants of composite materials. Compos B Eng 30:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Decouvreur V, Bel ED, Bouillard P (2006) On the effect of the dispersion error when updating acoustic models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:394–405

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Dhandole SD, Modak SV (2009) Simulated studies in FE model updating with application to vibro-acoustic analysis of the cavities, In: Proceedings of the third international conference on integrity, reliability and failure, Porto/Portugal

  31. Dhandole SD, Modak SV (2010) A comparative study of methodologies for vibro-acoustic FE model updating of cavities using simulated data. Int J Mech Mater Des 6:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dhandole S, Modak SV (2012) A constrained optimization based method for acoustic finite element model updating of cavities using pressure response. Appl Math Model 36:399–413

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing: theory, practice and application, 2nd edn. Research Studies Press Limited, England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fang H, Wang TJ, Chen X (2011) Model updating of lattice structures: a substructure energy approach. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(5):1469–1484

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Fang SE, Perera R (2009) A response surface methodology based damage identification technique. Smart Mater Struct 18:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fang SE, Perera R (2011) Damage identification by response surface based model updating using D-optimal design. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Farhat C, Hemez FM (1993) Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 31(9):1702–1711

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Fissette E, Stavrinidis C, Ibrahim S (1988) Error location and updating of analytical dynamic models using a force balance method. Proceedings of the sixth international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 1063–1070

    Google Scholar 

  39. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Friswell MI, Garvey SD, Penny JET (1995) Model reduction using dynamic and iterated IRS techniques. J Sound Vib 186(2):311–323

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Friswell MI, Inman DJ, Pilkey DF (1998) The direct updating of damping and stiffness matrices. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 36(3):491–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goller B, Broggi M, Calvi A, Schueller GI (2011) A stochastic model updating technique for complex aerospace structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gondhalekar AC, Kundra TK, Modak SV (2007) Dynamic design of a complex automobile structure via finite element model updating. Proceedings of the 25th international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guo Q, Zhang L (2004) Finite element model updating based on response surface methodology. Proceedings of the 22nd international modal analysis conference. Michigan, USA, pp 1990–1997

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guyan RJ (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 3(2):380–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hartog JPD (1934) Mechanical vibrations. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. He J, Ewins DJ (1991) Compatibility of measured and predicted vibration modes in model improvement studies. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 29(5):798–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Helfrick MN, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P, Schmidt T (2011) 3D digital image correlation methods for full-field vibration measurement. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hu SLJ, Li H, Wang S (2007) Cross-model cross-mode method for model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:1690–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Husain NA, Khodaparast HH, Snaylam A, James S, Sharp M, Dearden G, Ouyang H (2009) Modal testing and finite element model updating of laser spot welds. J Phys Conf Ser 181:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hwang HY, Kim C (2004) Damage detection in structures using a few frequency response measurements. J Sound Vib 270:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Imregun M, Ewins DJ, Hagiwara I, Ichikawa TA (1994) Comparison of sensitivity and response function based updating techniques. Proceedings of 12th international modal analysis conference. Hawaii, USA, pp 1390–1400

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jacquelin E, Adhikari S, Friswell MI (2012) A second-moment approach for direct probabilistic model updating in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 29:262–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jaishi B, Ren WX (2006) Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual. J Sound Vib 290:369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jamshidi E, Ashory MR (2009) Comparative study of RFM and model updating method using base excitation test data. Proceedings of the 27th international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 2399–2409

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jiang J, Dai H, Yuan Y (2013) A symmetric generalized inverse eigenvalue problem in structural dynamics model updating. Linear Algebra Appl 439:1350–1363

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Kabe AM (1985) Stiffness matrix adjustment using mode data. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 23(9):1431–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Khanmirza E, Khaji N, Majd VJ (2011) Model updating of multistory shear buildings for simultaneous identification of mass, stiffness and damping matrices using two different soft-computing methods. Expert Syst Appl 38:5320–5329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Khodaparast HH, Mottershead JE, Badcock KJ (2011) Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:1204–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kidder RL (1973) Reduction of structural frequency equations. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 11(6):892–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kim GH, Park YS (2008) An automated parameter selection procedure for finite-element model updating and its applications. J Sound Vib 309:778–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kim KO, Anderson WJ, Sandstrom RE (1983) Non-linear inverse perturbation method in dynamic analysis. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 21(9):1310–1316

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Kwon KS, Lin RM (2004) Frequency selection method for FRF-based model updating. J Sound Vib 278:285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kwon KS, Lin RM (2005) Robust finite element model updating using Taguchi method. J Sound Vib 280:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lammens S, Heylen W, Sas P (1992) Model updating and structural optimization of a tennis racket. Mech Syst Signal Process 6(5):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lepoittevin G, Kress G (2011) Finite element model updating of vibrating structures under free-free boundary conditions for modal damping prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2203–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Levin RI, Lieven NAJ (1998) Dynamic finite element model updating using neural networks. J Sound Vib 210(5):593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Levin RI, Lieven NAJ (1998) Dynamic finite element model updating using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(1):91–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Li WL (2002) A new method for structural model updating and joint stiffness identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(1):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lieven NAJ, Ewins DJ (1988) Spatial correlation of mode shapes, the coordinate modal assurance criterion (COMAC). Proceedings of the sixth international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 690–695

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lieven NAJ, Ewins DJ (1990) Expansion of modal data for correlation. Proceedings of the eighth international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 605–609

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lieven NAJ, Waters TP (1994) Error location using normalized cross orthogonality. Proceedings of the 12th international modal analysis conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 761–764

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lim TW (1990) Submatrix approach to stiffness matrix correction using modal test data. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 28(6):1123–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Lin RM, Zhu J (2007) Finite element model updating using vibration test data under base excitation. J Sound Vib 303:596–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lin RM, Lim MK, Du H (1995) Improved inverse eigensensitivity method for structural analytical model updating. Trans ASME J Vib Acoust 117(2):192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lin RM, Ewins DJ (1990) Model updating using FRF data. Proceedings of 15th international modal analysis seminar. KU Leuven, Belgium, pp 141–162

    Google Scholar 

  77. Maia NMM, Silva JM (1997) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Research Studies Press Limited, England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  78. Mares C, Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (2006) Stochastic model updating: part 1- theory and simulated example. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1674–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Marwala T (2005) Finite element model updating using particle swarm optimization. Int J Eng Simul 6(2):25–30

    Google Scholar 

  80. Marwala T, Sibisi S (2005) Finite element model updating using Bayesian framework and modal properties. J Aircr 42(1):275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Modak SV (2014) Direct matrix updating of vibroacoustic finite element models using modal test data. AIAA J 52(7):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Modak SV, Kundra TK, Nakra BC (2000) Model updating using constrained optimization. Mech Res Commun 27(5):543–551

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Modak SV, Kundra TK, Nakra BC (2002a) Prediction of dynamic characteristics using updated finite element models. J Sound Vib 254(3):447–467

  84. Modak SV, Kundra TK, Nakra BC (2002b) Comparative study of model updating methods using simulated experimental data. Comput Struct 80:437–447

  85. Modak SV, Kundra TK, Nakra BC (2005) Studies in dynamic design using updated models. J Sound Vib 281:943–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Mottershead JE, Link M, Friswell MI (2011) The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2275–2296. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.012

  87. Mthembu L, Marwala T, Friswell MI, Adhikari S (2010) Finite element model selection using particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 28th international modal analysis conference. Florida, USA, pp 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  88. O’Challan JC (1989) A procedure for an improved reduced system (IRS) model. Proceedings of the seventh international modal analysis conference. Las Vegas, USA, pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  89. O’Challan JC, Avitabile P, Riemer R (1989) System equivalent reduction and expansion processes. Proceedings of the seventh international modal analysis conference. Las Vegas, USA, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  90. O’Challan JC, Liew IW, Avitabile P, Madden R (1986) An efficient method of determining rotational degrees of freedom from analytical and experimental modal data. Proceedings of the fourth international modal analysis conference. Los Angeles, USA, pp 50–58

    Google Scholar 

  91. Petyt M (1998) Introduction to finite element vibration analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Pilkey DF (1998) Computation of damping matrix for finite element model updating, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia

  93. Pradhan S, Modak V (2012) Normal response function method for mass and stiffness matrix updating using complex FRFs. Mech Syst Signal Process 32:232–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pradhan S, Modak V (2012) A method for damping matrix identification using frequency response data. Mech Syst Signal Process 33:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ramamurti V, Rao MH (1998) Studies on model updating using different finite elements, the editor. J Sound Vib 211(3):507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ren WX, Chen HB (2010) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method. Eng Struct 32:2455–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Sastry CVS, Mahapatra DR, Gopalakrishnan S, Ramamurthy TS (2003) An iterative system equivalent reduction expansion process for extraction of high frequency response from reduced order finite element model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:1821–1840

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Shahidi S, Pakzad S (2014) Generalized response surface model updating using time domain data, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 140(8)

  99. Sidhu J, Ewins DJ (1984) Correlation of finite element and modal test studies of a practical structure. Proceedings of the second international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 756–762

    Google Scholar 

  100. Sinha JK, Mujumdar PM, Moorthy RIKA (2000) parameter identification technique for detection of spacer locations in an assembly of two coaxial flexible tubes. Nucl Eng Des 196:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Smith SW, Beattie CA (1991) Secant-method adjustment for structural models. Am Inst Aeronaut stronaut J 29(1):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Steenackers G, Devriendt C, Guillaume P (2007) On the use of transmissibility measurements for finite element model updating. J Sound Vib 303:707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Teughels A, Roeck GD (2004) Structural damage identification of the highway bridge Z24 by FE model updating. J Sound Vib 278:589–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Tu Z, Lu Y (2008) FE model updating using artificial boundary conditions with genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 86:714–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Vepsa A, Haapaniemi H, Luukkanen P, Nurkkala P, Saarenheimo A (2005) Application of finite element model updating to a feed water pipeline of a nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des 235:1849–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Wahab MMA, Roeck GD, Peeters B (1999) Parameterization of damage in reinforced concrete structures using model updating. J Sound Vib 228(4):717–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Wang W, Mottershead JE, Mares C (2009) Mode-shape recognition and finite element model updating using the Zernike moment descriptor. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:2088–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Waters TP (1998) A modified force balance method for locating errors in dynamic finite element models. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(2):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Weber B, Paultre P, Proulx J (2009) Consistent regularization of nonlinear model updating for damage identification. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:1965–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Williams EJ, Green JSA (1990) spatial curve fitting technique for estimating rotational degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the eighth international modal analysis conference. Orlando, USA, pp 376–381

    Google Scholar 

  111. Xiamin Z (1999) A best matrix approximation method for updating the analytical model. J Sound Vib 223(5):759–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Zapico JL, Buelga AG, Gonzalez MP, Alonso R (2008) Finite element model updating of a small steel frame using neural networks. Smart Mater Struct 17:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Zhou J, Farquhar T (2005) Wheat stem moduli in vivo via reference basis model updating. J Sound Vib 285:1109–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harmesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sehgal, S., Kumar, H. Structural Dynamic Model Updating Techniques: A State of the Art Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng 23, 515–533 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-015-9150-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-015-9150-3

Keywords

Navigation