Skip to main content
Log in

‚The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly‘

Esping-Andersens Sozialstaats-Typologie und die konfessionellen Wurzeln des westlichen Wohlfahrtsstaats

  • I. Abhandlungen
  • Published:
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Folgt man dem einflussreichsten Beitrag zur vergleichenden Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung der letzten Zeit, Esping-Andersens „Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism“, so tritt der entwickelte westliche Sozialstaat in drei Varianten auf: entweder als sozialdemokratisches, als konservatives oder als liberales Wohlfahrtsstaatsregime. Ein genauerer Blick zeigt, dass Esping-Andersens Typenbildung und Länderzuordnungen insbesondere im Fall des konservativen Regimes sehr problematisch sind. Der Beitrag argumentiert, dass diese gravierenden Probleme daher rühren, dass seine Theorie vornehmlich den Klassenkonflikt, nur selektiv aber den Einfluss konfessioneller Faktoren in den Blick nimmt. Wesentliche theoretische Widersprüche und empirische Unstimmigkeiten seines Ansatzes lassen sich lösen, wenn man neben der Bedeutung der katholischen Soziallehre für den institutionellen Entwicklungspfad des Sozialstaats auch den Einfluss des Protestantismus, und hier insbesondere den Einfluss der freikirchlichen Strömungen des Protestantismus und des Calvinismus beachtet. Der Beitrag zeigt dies mit vergleichenden Daten sowohl für die Frühphase (1890 bis 1920), als auch für die Hochzeit des entwickelten Wohlfahrtsstaats (von 1960 bis 1990).

Abstract

According to the most influential contribution of recent years to the comparative study of advanced welfare states, Esping-Andersen’s ’Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism‘, the welfare state basically comes in three variants: as a social-democratic, a conservative, or as a liberal regime. Yet, at a closer look, in particular the ’conservative‘ regime-type represents a highly problematic category. The article claims that the major problems of Esping-Andersen’s typology and theory originate from his sole focus on the class conflict and his neglect of the religious cleavage. Major theoretical contradictions and empirical puzzles of his approach can be solved if we take not only the impact of the catholic social doctrine on the development of the welfare state into account, but consider also the influence of social protestantism, especially that of protestant dissent and of protestant non-conformism. The paper substantiates this claim with data for the early formative period of the welfare state (1890–1920) as well as for the high-time of the welfare state from the 1960s to the 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • Alber, Jens, 1982: Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtsstaat. Analysen zur Entwicklung der Sozialversicherung in Westeuropa. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber, Jens, 1995: A Framework for the Comparative Study of Social Services, Journal of European Social Policy 5: 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, Jens, 1998: Recent Developments in Continental European Welfare States: Do Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands Prove to be Birds of a Feather? Contribution to the 14th World Congress of Sociology, Montreal 29 July 1998.

  • Alber, Jens, 2001: Die Modernisierung des Wohlfahrtsstaates: Eine Neumischung moderner und traditionaler Elemente? In: Karl-Ulrich Mayer et al. (Hg.): Festschrift für Wolfgang Zapf (im Erscheinen).

  • Baldwin, Peter, 1997: State and Citizenship in the Age of Globalization. S. 95–118 in: Peter Koslowski (Hg.): Restructuring the Welfare State. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, David B. (Hg.), 1982: World Christian Encyclopedia. A Comparative Study of Churches and Religions in the Modern World 1900–2000. Nairobi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, Stefano, 2000: The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980. Cambridge/UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel, und Jonathan N. Katz, 1999: What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics, American Political Science Review 89: 634–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, Ulrich, und Karin Henzel, 1999: Die Niederlande. S. 131–157 in: Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger (Hg.): Rentenversicherung im internationalen Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M.: WDV Wirtschaftsdienst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, Jonathan, 1993: Catholicism, Christian Democrats and ‚Reformed Capitalism’. S. 48–65 in: Colin Crouch und David Marquand (Hg.): Ethics and Markets: Cooperation and Competition within Capitalist Economies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G., 1985: The Working Class and Welfare. Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand 1890–1980. Wellington: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G., 1994: On Religion and Public Policy: Does Catholicism make a Difference?, European Journal of Political Research 25: 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G., 1996: Need-based Strategies of Social Protection in Australia and New Zealand. S. 88–115 in: Gøsta Esping-Andersen (Hg.): Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castels, Francis G., und Deborah Mitchell, 1993: Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations. S. 93–128 in: Francis F. Castles (Hg.): Families of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, Peter, 1993: Morality and Politics: The Free Churches and the Labour Party between the Wars, The Historical Journal 36: 667–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Norman H., 1976: Deliver us from Evil. An Interpretation of American Prohibition. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert H., 1993: The Development of the Dutch Welfare State. From Workers’ Insurance to Universal Entitlement. Pittsburgh and London: The University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, Hans, 1966: The Netherlands. Opposition in a Segmented Society. S. 188–236 in: Robert A. Dahl (Hg.): Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disney, Richard, 2000: Crisis in Public Pension Programmes in OECD: What are the Reform Options?, The Economic Journal 110: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1990: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New York: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1996: Welfare States without Work: The Impasse of Labor Shedding and Familialism in Continental Europe. S. 66–87 in: Ders. (Hg.): Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1999: Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Maurizio, 1996: The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe, Journal of European Social Policy 6: 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Maurizio, 1997: Introduction général. S. 15–26 in: MIRE (Hg.): Comparer les systèmes de protection sociale en Europe du Sud. Paris.

  • Flora, Peter, 1983: State, Economy, and Society in Western Europe 1815–1975. Volume I: The Growth of Mass Democracies and Welfare States. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus/London: MacMillan/Chicago: St. James Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, Peter, 1983a: State, Economy, and Society in Western Europe 1815–1975. Volume II: The Growth of Industrial Societies and Capitalist Economies. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus/London: MacMillan/Chicago: St. James Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, Peter, und Jens Alber, 1981: Modernization, Democratization, and the Development of Welfare States in Western Europe. S. 37–80 in: Peter Flora und Arnold J. Heidenheimer (Hg.): The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, Peter, Stein Kuhnle und David Urwin (Hg.), 1999: State Formation, Nation Building and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, Michael, 1978: The New Liberalism. An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E., Bruce Headey, Ruud Muffels und Henk-Jan Dirven, 1999: The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, 2000: Die Nation — von Gott ‚erfunden’? Kritische Randnotizen zum Theologiebedarf der historischen Nationalismusforschung. S. 285–317 in: Gerd Krumein und Hartmut Lehmann (Hg.): ‚Gott mit uns’. Nation, Religion und Gewalt im 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, Erich, 1977: Die Parteien in der Schweiz. Bern: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenheimer, Arnold J., 1983: Secularization Patterns and the Westward Spread of the Welfare State, 1883–1983. Two Dialogues about how and why Britain, the Netherlands, and the United States have Differed. S. 3–38 in: Richard F. Tomasson (Hg.): The Welfare State 1883–1983 (Comparative Social Research, Vol. 6). London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Karl, 2000: Elephants on the Move. Patterns of Public Pension Reform in OECD Countries, European Review 8: 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin und John D. Stephens, 1993: Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State, American Journal of Sociology 99: 711–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin und John D. Stephens, 1997: Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Northwestern University and University of South Carolina (http://www.lis.ceps.lu).

  • Huber, Evelyne, und John D. Stephens, 2001: Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment. S. 107–145 in: Paul Pierson (Hg.): The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ILO [International Labour Office], 1954: The Costs of Social Security. Genf: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, und Anne Wren 1998: Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy, World Politics 50: 507–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis N., 1996: The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver, 1988: Christentum und Wohlfahrtsstaat, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 34: 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, Kees van, 1995: Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kossmann, E.H., 1978: The Low Countries, 1780–1940. Oxford: Claredon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langner, Albrecht, 1998 Katholische und evangelische Sozialethik im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luebbert, Gregory, 1991: Liberalism, Fascism and Social Democracy. Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, Hugh, 1984: Religion and the Working Class in Nineteenth-Century Britain. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, Agnus, 1995: Monitoring the World Economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, Philip, 2000: ‚Modell Deutschland ‘as an Interdenominational Compromise, CES Working Paper 01/2000. Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, Philip, 2001: Ordoliberalismus als ökonomische Ordnungstheologie, Leviathan 29: 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, David, 1978: A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, David, 1978a: The Religious Condition of Europe. S. 228–287 in: Salvador Giner und Margaret Scotford Archer (Hg.): Contemporary Europe. Social Structures and Cultural Patterns. London u.a.: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Race, 1993: Australia’s First Fabians. Middle-Class Radicals, Labour Activists and the Early Labour Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIRE [Mission de Recherche et Expérimentation] (Hg.), 1997: Comparer les systèmes de protection sociale en Europe du Sud. Paris.

  • Mol, Hans (Hg.), 1972: Western Religion. A Country by Country Sociological Inquiry. Den Haag/Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert, 1998: Politische Institutionen und Sozialpolitik in der Schweiz. Frankfurt a.M. u.a.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert, und Uwe Wagschal, 1998: Drei Welten des Wohlfahrtsstaates? Das Stratifizierungskonzept in der clusteranalytischen Überprüfung. S. 109–135 in: Stephan Lessenich und Ilona Ostner (Hg.): Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus. Der Sozialstaat in vergleichender Perspektive. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert, und Uwe Wagschal (Hg.), 2000: Der gezügelte Wohlfahrtsstaat: Sozialpolitik in reichen Industrienationen. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, Henry, 1965: Origins of the Labour Party. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, Thomas, Philip Manow und Vera Troeger, 2002: Panel Data Analysis in the Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State: A Note on Methodology and Theory. Mimeo, Universität Konstanz.

  • Pierson, Paul, 1999: Not just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes. Forthcoming in Studies in American Development. Mimeo, Harvard/Cambridge, Ma.

  • Richardson, Len, 1992: Parties and Political Change. S. 201–229 in: Geoffrey W. Rice (Hg.): The Oxford History of New Zealand. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 2001 (1997): Employment and the Welfare State. A Continental Dilemma. S. 270–283 in: Bernhard Ebbinghaus und Philip Manow (Hg.): Comparing Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan, and the USA. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., und Vivien A. Schmidt, 2001: Introduction. S. 1–18 in: Dies. (Hg.): Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Vol. II: Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G., 1998: Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich (2. Aufl.). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, Volker, 1971: Die Anfänge staatlicher Sozialreform im liberalen Italien. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda, 1992: Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: the Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States Cambridge/Mass.: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda, 2000: Religion, Civil Society, and Social Provision in the U.S.. S. 21–50 in: Mary Jo Bane, Brent Coffin und Ronald Thiemann (Hg.): Who will Provide? Boulder/Col.: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, Edward K., 1989: Brotherly Tomorrows: Movements for a Cooperative Society in America 1820–1920. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John D., 1979: The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swaan, Abram de, 1988: In Care of the State: Health Care, Education, and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, John L., 1983: Alternative America. Henry George, Edward Bellamy, Henry Demarest Lloyd and the Adversary Tradition. Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeltsch, Ernst, 1912 [1994]: Die Soziallehren der christlichen Kirchen und Gruppen. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Jelle, und Anton Hemerijck, 1997: The Dutch Miracle. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, Harold L., 1981: Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development. S. 345–382 in: Peter Flora und Arnold J. Heidenheimer (Hg.): The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Manow.

Additional information

Ich danke Jens Alber, André Kaiser, Sven Jochem, Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Bernhard Kittel, Herbert Obinger und Achim Schmid für Kritik und Kommentare zu früheren Versionen des Papiers. Thomas Plümper und Vera Troeger danke ich für ihre wertvolle Hilfe bei der Datenanalyse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manow, P. ‚The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly‘. Koelner Z.Soziol.u.Soz.Psychol 54, 203–225 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-002-0036-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-002-0036-7

Keywords

Navigation