Abstract and Key Results
-
Reliability, validity, generalisability and objectivity are fundamental concerns for quantitative researchers. For qualitative research, however, the role of these dimensions is blurred. Some researchers argue that these dimensions are not applicable to qualitative research and a qualitative researcher’s tool chest should be geared towards trustworthiness and encompass issues such as credibility, dependability, transferability and confirmability.
-
This paper advocates the use of formalised and software-based procedures for the analysis and interpretation of qualitative interview data. It is argued that International Business research, with a focus on international datasets, equivalence issues, multiple research environments and multiple researchers, will benefit from formalisation. The use of software programmes is deemed to help to substantiate the analysis and interpretation of textual interview data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Also referred to as ‘differential item functioning’ (DIF). For our context of qualitative research this will be more appropriately labelled ‘stimulus’ bias.
Different response patterns and physical conditions in qualitative interview settings were taken into consideration to establish equivalence of research. While, for example, German managers invited the interviewees into their offices, Austrians usually used more informal settings, such as the cantina or informal meeting spots. Italian managers wanted to meet outside the company premises such as coffee shops.
Countries: Austria, Germany and Italy. The rationale for this was to learn about management idiosyncrasies in geographically close yet psychographically heterogeneous environments.
These big nodes included: “companies’ goals”, “role of management”, “company culture”, “concept of knowledge management”, “origin of the knowledge management system”, “implementation of the knowledge management system”, “measures of knowledge management”, and “ideal knowledge management”.
References
Armstrong, D. et al., The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study, Sociology, 31, 3, 1997, pp. 597–616.
Bennett, R./Gabriel, H., Organisational Factors and Knowledge Management within Large Marketing Departements: An Empirical Study, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 3, 1999, pp. 212–225.
Berry, J. W., Imposed Etics-Emics-Derived Etics: The Operationalization of a Compelling Idea, International Journal of Psychology, 24, 6, 1989, pp. 721–735.
Borman, K. M./LeCompte, M. D./Goetz, J. P., Ethnographic and Qualitative Research Design and Why It Doesn’t Work, American Behavioral Scientist, 30, 1, 1986, pp. 42–57.
Brislin, R. W./Lonner, W. J./Thorndike, R. H., Cross Cultural Research Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons 1973.
Buckley, P. J./Carter, M J., Knowledge Management in Global Technology Markets: Applying Theory to Practice, Long Range Planning, 33, 1, 2000, pp. 55–71.
Buckley, P. J./Carter, M. J., Process and Structure in Knowledge Management Practices of British and US Multinational Enterprises, Journal of International Management, 8, 1, 2002, pp. 29–48.
Buckley, P. J./Chapman, M., The Use of Native Categories in Management Research, British Journal of Management, 8, 4, 1997, pp. 283–299.
Chinese Culture Connection, Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 2, 1987, pp. 149–164.
Churchill, G. A. Jr., Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 7th ed., Fort Worth: The Dryden Press 1995.
Corbin, J./Strauss, A., Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13, 1, 1990, pp. 3–21.
Craig, C. S./Douglas, S. P., International Marketing Research, 3rd ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 2005.
Crawford, H. K./Leybourne, M. L./Arnott, A., How We Ensured Rigour in a Multi-Site, Multi-Discipline, Multi-Researcher Study, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, 1, 2000, http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-00/01-00crawfordetal-e.pdf.
Creswell, J. W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions, London: Sage Publications 1997.
Davidson, A. R. et al., Cross-Cultural Model Testing: Toward a Solution of the Etic-Emic Dilemma, International Journal of Psychology, 11, 1, 1976, pp. 1–13.
Denzin, N. K./Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1994.
DuBois, F. L./Reeb, D., Ranking the International Business Journals, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 4, 2000, pp. 689–704.
Earley, P. C./Singh, H., International and Intercultural Management Research: What’s Next?, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 2, 1995, pp. 327–340.
Easterby-Smith, M./Thorpe, R./Lowe, A., Management Research: An Introduction, Sage Series in Management Research, 2nd ed., London: Sage Publications 2002.
Foss, N. J./Pedersen, T., Transferring Knowledge in MNCs: The Role of Sources of Subsidiary Knowledge and Organizational Context, Journal of International Management, 8, 1, 2002, pp. 49–67.
Ghauri, P. N., Designing and Conducting Case Studies in International Business Research, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 109–124.
Ghauri, P. N./Grønhaug, K., Research Methods in Business Studies: A Practical Guide, 3rd ed., London: Financial Times Prentice Hall 2005.
Grunert, K. G./Grunert, S. C., Measuring Subjective Meaning Structures by the Laddering Method: Theoretical Considerations and Methodological Problems, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 3, 1995, pp. 209–225.
Guba, E. G./Lincoln, Y. S., Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park: Sage Publications 1989.
Harbison, F. H./Myers, C. A., Management in the Industrial World: An International Analysis, New York: McGraw Hill 1959.
Hesse-Biber, S., Unleashing Frankenstein’s Monster?, in Burgess, R (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology: Computing and Qualitative Research , Vol. 5, London: JAI Press 1996, pp. 25–41.
Hislop, D., Linking Human Resource Management and Knowledge Management Via Commitment: A Review and Research Agenda, Employee Relations, 25, 1/2, 2003, pp. 182–202.
Hofstede, G./Bond, M. H., The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth, Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4, 1988, pp. 4–21.
Hui, H. C. /Triandis, H. C., Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 3, 1989, pp. 296–309.
Jack, G./Westwood, R., Postcolonialism and the Politics of Qualitative Research in International Business, Management International Review, 46, 4, 2006, pp. 481–500.
Jackson, M. S./Niblo, D. M., The Role of Qualitative Methodology in Cross-Cultural Research, Qualitative Research Journal, 3, 1, 2003, pp. 18–27.
Kelle, U., Theory Building in Qualitative Research and Computer Programs for the Management of Textual Data, Social Research Online, 2, 2, 1997, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/1.html.
Kiely, T., Wired Focus Groups, Harvard Business Review, 76, 1, 1998, pp. 12–16.
King, G./Keohane, R. O./Verba, S., Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1994.
Kirk, J./Miller, M. L., Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 01, Newbury Park: Sage Publications 1986.
Kvale, S., Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1996.
LeCompte, M. D./Goetz, J. P., Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research, Review of Educational Research, 52, 1, 1982, pp. 31–60.
Lee, T. W., Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Organizational Research Methods Series, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1999.
Lincoln, Y. S./Guba, E. G., Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications 1984.
Lonner, W. J., Helfrich’s ‘Principle of Triarchic Resonance’: A Commentary on yet Another Perspective on the Ongoing and Tenacious Etic-Emic Debate, Culture & Psychology, 5, 2, 1999, pp. 173–181.
Mangabeira, W./Armstrong, D./Sprokkereef, A., The Data, the Team, and the Ethnograph, in Robert, B. (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology: Computing and Qualitative Research, Vol. 5, London: JAI Press 1996, pp. 81–103.
Marschan-Piekkari, R./Welch, D./Welch, L., In the Shadow: The Impact of Language on Structure, Power and Communication in the Multinational, International Business Review, 8, 4, 1999, pp. 421–440.
Marshall, H., Rigour or Rigidity? The Role of CAQDAS in Qualitative Research, Association for Qualitative Research (AQR), Melbourne, Australia, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/aqr/offer/papers/HMarshal.htm. 2001, July 5-7
Marshall, H., What Do We Do When We Code Data?, Qualitative Research Journal, 2, 1, 2002, pp. 56–70.
Maxwell, J. A., Designing a Qualitative Study, in Bickman, L./Rog, D. J. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, London: Sage Publications 1997, pp. 69–100.
McDonald, M. H. B., Methodological Problems Associated with Qualitative Research: Some Observations and a Case Analysis of International Marketing Planning, International Studies of Management & Organization, 15, 2, 1985, pp. 19–40.
Merton, R. K., Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Free Press 1949.
Miles, M. B., Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4, 1979, pp. 590–601.
Miles, M. B./Huberman, A. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1994.
Morey, N. C./Luthans, F., An Emic Perspective and Ethnoscience Methods for Organizational Research, Academy of Management Review, 9, 1, 1984, pp. 27–36.
Mudambi, R., Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms, Journal of International Management, 8, 1, 2002, pp. 1–9.
Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric Theory , 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill 1978.
Parkhe, A., ‘Messy’ Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory, Academy of Management Review, 18, 2, 1993, pp. 227–268.
Pauwels, P./Matthyssens, P., The Architecture of Multiple Case Study Research in International Business, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 125–143.
Peterson, R. B., Empirical Research in International Management: A Critique and Future Agenda, in Marschan-Piekkari, R./Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2004, pp. 25–55.
Piekkari, R./Welch, C., Language Dynamics in Cross-Cultural Qualitative Interviewing, Nordic Workshop in International Business, INSEAD, Fontainebleau 2004, May 26-28
Pike, K. L., Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, The Hague: Mouton 1966.
Poortinga, Y. H., Equivalence of Cross-Cultural Data: An Overview of Basic Issues, International Journal of Psychology, 24, 6, 1989, pp. 737–756.
Potter, W. J., An Analysis of Thinking and Research About Qualitative Methods, Lea’s Communication Series, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1996.
Richards, L., Using NVivo in Qualitative Research , 2nd ed., Bundoora: QSR International Pty 2000.
Richards, T. J./Richards, L., Using Computers in Qualitative Research, in Denzin, N. K./Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research , Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1994, pp. 445–462.
Salzberger, T./Sinkovics, R. R./Schlegelmilch, B. B., Data Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Research: A Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Latent Trait Theory Based Approaches, Australasian Marketing Journal, 7, 2, 1999, pp. 23–38.
Silverman, D, Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World , Aldershot: Gower Publication Co. 1985.
Sinkovics, R. R./Penz, E./Ghauri, P. N., Analysing Textual Data in International Marketing Research, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 1, 2005, pp. 9–38.
Strauss, A./Corbin, J., Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview, in Denzin, N. K./Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1994, pp. 273–285.
Strauss, A. L./Corbin, J. M., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques , Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 1998.
Suddaby, R., From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 4, 2006, pp. 633–642.
Sykes, W., Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Market Research: A Review of the Literature, Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 3, 1990, pp. 289–338.
Van de Vijver, F./Poortinga, Y. H., Towards an Integrated Analysis of Bias in Cross-Cultural Assessment, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 1, 1997, pp. 21–29.
Welch, C. et al., Corporate Elites as Informants in Qualitative International Business Research, International Business Review, 11, 5, 2002, pp. 611–628.
Welch, C./Piekkari, R., Crossing Language Boundaries: Qualitative Interviewing in International Business, Management International Review, 46, 4, 2006, pp. 417–437.
Yang, Z./Wang, X./Su, C., A Review of Research Methodologies in International Business, International Business Review, 15, 6, 2006, pp. 601–617.
Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 2003.
Zuell, C./Landmann, J./Geis, A., Textpack Pc,2002, http://www.gesis.org/software/textpack/index.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinkovics, R., Penz, E. & Ghauri, P. Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business. MANAGE. INT. REV. 48, 689–714 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z