Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The expression of person and number: a typologist’s perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The categories of person and number have been analyzed extensively, both from a generative/structural perspective and from a typological/cross-linguistic perspective. The goal of both approaches is to account for the diversity of human languages, but in practice both have a rather different take on the subject. One major difference between these approaches is the relation between language-specific and cross-linguistic analyses. This paper argues that it is crucial to strictly distinguish between the two. However, this plea is at odds with the generative/structural perspective, which attempts to deal with both kinds of analyses at the same time. In contrast, it is of central importance from a typological/cross-linguistic perspective to keep the comparison constant across the wide variation as attested among human languages, thereby often ignoring many language-specific details (for the course of the comparison). The final section of this paper summarizes some major results of recent cross-linguistic comparisons of the person/number categories in the world’s languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baerman, M. (2002). The Surrey person syncretism database.

  • Baerman M. (2004) Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language 80(4): 807–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baerman M. (2005) Typology and the formal modelling of syncretism. In: Booij G., Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2004. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 41–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baerman M., Brown D. (2005) Syncretisms in verbal person/number marking. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2005). The syntax—morphology interface: A study of syncretism (Cambridge studies in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bandelt H.-J., Dress A.W.M. (1992) Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1(3): 242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benincà P., Poletto C. (2005) The third dimension of person features. In: Cornips L., Corrigan K.P. (eds) Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 265–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, D. N. S. (2004). Pronouns. (Oxford studies in typology and linguistic theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bhat D.N.S. (2005) Third-person pronouns and demonstratives. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 178–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas F. (1911) Introduction. In: Boas F. (eds) Handbook of American Indian languages. Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC, pp 1–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik J.D. (2008) Missing persons: A case study in morphological universals. The Linguistic Review 25(1–2): 203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger D. (1950) Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6: 117–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman D.M. (1990) Sanuma. In: Derbyshire D.C., Pullum G.K. (eds) Handbook of Amazonian languages. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 15–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant D., Huson D.H. (2005) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Phylogenetic Networks 23(2): 254–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler I.R., Freeze R. (1966) The distinctive features of pronominal systems. Anthropological Linguistics 8(8): 78–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlenova, S. F. (1973). Kategorija chisla v lichnyx mestoimenijax [Category of number within personal pronouns]. In Lingvotipologicheskie Issledovanija (pp. 164–201). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo MGU.

  • Conklin H.C. (1962) Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In: Householder F.W., Saporta S. (eds) Problems in lexicography. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, pp 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowper, E., & Hall, D. C. (2005). The pieces of pi. In M.-O. Junker, M. McGinnis, & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 CLA Annual Conference (pp.

  • Cysouw, M. (2001a). The (a)symmetry of inflectional person marking. Paper presented at ALT IV, Santa Barbara, CA.

  • Cysouw, M. (2001b). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. PhD dissertation Radboud University Nijmegen.

  • Cysouw M. (2003a) Against implicational universals. Linguistic Typology 7(1): 89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw, M. (2003b). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. (Oxford studies in typology and linguistic theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cysouw M. (2005a) A typology of honorific uses of clusivity. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 213–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2005b) Inclusive/exclusive forms of ‘we’. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 162–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2005c) Syncretisms involving clusivity. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–Exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 73–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2005d) What it means to be rare: the case of person marking. In: Frajzyngier Z., Hodges A., Rood D.S. (eds) Linguistic diversity and language theories. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 235–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2007a) Building semantic maps: The case of person marking. In: Wälchli B., Miestamo M. (eds) New challenges in typology. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 225–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2007b) New approaches to cluster analysis of typological indices. In: Köhler R., Grzbek P. (eds) Exact methods in the study of language and text. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw M. (2009) The asymmetry of affixation. Snippets 20(3): 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw, M. (2010). Semantic maps as metrics on meaning. Linguistic Discovery (forthcoming).

  • Dalrymple M., Kaplan R.M. (2000) Feature indeterminacy and feature resolution. Language 76(4): 759–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel M. (2005) Plurality in independent personal pronouns. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 146–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel M., Moravcsik E.A. (2005) The associative plural. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 150–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrushina N., Goussev V. (2005) Inclusive imperative. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Dress A.W.M., Huson D.H. (2004) Constructing splits graphs. IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology And Bioinformatics 1(3): 109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filimonova E. (2005a) Clusivity cross-linguistically: Common trends and possible patterns. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 399–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Filimonova, E., (Ed.) (2005b). Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive—exclusive distinction (Typological studies in language). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Fischer S. (2006) Zur Morphologie der deutschen Personalpronomina—eine Spaltungsanalyse. In: Müller G., Trommer J. (eds) Subanalysis of argument encoding in distributed morphology. Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, pp 77–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Forchheimer P. (1953) The category of person in language. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton J. (2002) Syncretism, impoverishment, and the structure of person features. Chicago Linguistic Society 38(1): 207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehling, T. (2004). `Ich’, ‘du’ und andere: Eine sprachtypologische Studie zu den grammatischen Kategorien ‘Person’ und ‘Numerus’. Sprache, Kommunikation, Wirklichkeit: Linguistische Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik. Münster: LIT.

  • Gehling T. (2006) Die Suche nach dem anderen ihr. Zur Inklusiv-Exklusiv-Distinktion in der Zweiten Person. In: Gehling T., Voss V., Wohlgemut J. (eds) Einblicke in Sprache. Logos, Berlin, pp 153–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgi D. (2006) A distributed morphology approach to argument encoding in Kambera. In: Müller G., Trommer J. (eds) Subanalysis of argument encoding in distributed morphology. Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. (1979) Footing. Semiotica 25(1–2): 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson R. (2000) Pronoun acquisition and the morphological feature geometry. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley H., Ritter E. (2002a) Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 483–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley H., Ritter E. (2002b) Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry. In: Simon H., Wiese H. (eds) Pronouns—grammar and representation. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath M. (2007) Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmbrecht J. (2004a) Ikonizität in Personalpronomina. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23(2): 211–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmbrecht, J. (2004b). Personal pronouns: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Ph. D. thesis, Habelitationschrift, Erfurt.

  • Hollenbach B.E. (1970) Inclusive plural: A further look. Linguistics 60: 27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. (1999). Pech (Paya) (Languages of the world/materials). Munich: Lincom.

  • Hopkins E.B. (1986) Pronouns and pronoun fusion in Yaouré. In: Wiesemann U. (eds) Pronominal systems. Narr, Tübingen, pp 191–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, S. (1996). The personal pronouns in the Germanic languages: A study of personal pronoun morphology and change in the Germanic languages form the first records to the present day. (Studia Linguistica Germanica). Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Huson D.H., Bryant D. (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen O. (1924) The philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock D. (1977) Me and you versus the rest. Irian 6: 33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis M. (2005) On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 81(3): 699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, W. B. (1990). A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. (Studies in language companion series). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • McGregor W.B. (1996) The pronominal system of Gooniyandi and Bunuba. In: McGregor W.B. (eds) Studies in Kimberley languages in honour of Howard Coate. Lincom, Munich, pp 159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay G.R. (1978) Pronominal person and number categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana. Oceanic Linguistics 17: 27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E. A. (1994). Group plural–associative plural or cohort plural. Linguist List, 5(681). http://linguistlist.org/issues/5/5-681.html.

  • Moravcsik E.A. (2004) A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3): 469–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller G. (2006a) Notes on paradigm economy. In: Müller G., Trommer J. (eds) Subanalysis of argument encoding in distributed morphology. Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, pp 161–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller G. (2006b) Subanalyse verbaler Flexionsmarker. In: Breindl E., Gunkel L., Strecker B. (eds) Grammatische Untersuchungen, Analysen und Reflexionen. Gisela Zifonun zum 60. Geburtstag. Narr, Tübingen, pp 183–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, A. I. (2003). Do person/number syncretisms refer to negative values? Paper presented at 77th meeting of the LSA, Atlanta.

  • Palácio A.P. (1986) Aspects of the morphology of Guató. In: Elson B.F. (eds) Language in global perspective: Papers in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 1935–1985. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas, TX, pp 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne D.L., Payne T.E. (1990) Yagua. In: Derbyshire D.C., Pullum G.K. (eds) Handbook of Amazonian languages. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 249–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike K.L. (1965) Non-linear order and anti-redundancy in German morphological matrices. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 32(3/4): 193–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E., & Harley, H. (1998). Meaning in morphology: a feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Paper presented at 40th GLOW Colloquium, Tilburg.

  • Rumsey A. (1996) On some relationships among person, number, and mode in Bunuba. In: McGregor W.B. (eds) Studies in Kimberley languages in honour of Howard Coate. Lincom, Munich, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey A. (2000) Bunuba. In: Dixon R.M.W., Blake B.J. (eds) Handbook of Australian languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 34–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N., Nei M. (1987) The neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4): 406–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland U. (2003) A new semantics of number. In: Young R.B., Zhou Y. (eds) Proceedings of SALT 13. CLC Publications, Cornell, Ithaka, pp 258–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz L.J. (1986) The function of free pronouns. In: Wiesemann U. (eds) Pronominal systems. Narr, Tübingen, pp 405–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewierska, A. (2004). Person (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Siewierska A. (2005a) Gender distinctions in independent pronouns. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 182–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewierska A. (2005b) Third-person zero of verbal person marking. In: Haspelmath M., Dryer M.S., Gil D., Comrie B. (eds) World atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 418–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewierska A., Bakker D. (2005) Inclusive and exclusive in free and bound pronouns. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 151–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewierska A., Bakker D. (2006) Bi-directional vs. uni-directional asymmetries in the encoding of semantic distinctions in free and bound person forms. In: Nevalainen T., Klemola J., Laitinen M. (eds) Types of variation: Diachronic, dialectical and typological interfaces. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 21–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (2005) Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second-person plural. In: Filimonova E. (eds) Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive–exclusive distinction. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskaya, N. K. (1980). Nekotorye semanticeskie universalii v sisteme licnyx mestoimenij [Some semantic universals in systems of personal pronouns]. In I. F. Vardul’ (Ed.), Teorija i tipologija mestoimenij [Theory and typology of pronouns] (pp. 84–102). Moskva: Nauka.

  • Swiggers, P., & Wouters, A. (1998). The Tékhne Grammatiké van Dionysius Thrax: De oudste Spraakkunst in het Westen (Orbis Linguarum). Leuven: Peeters.

  • Thomas D.D. (1955) Three analyses of the Ilocano pronoun system. Word 11(2): 204–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuite, K. (1997). Svan (Languages of the world/materials). Munich: Lincom.

  • Uhlig, G. (1883). Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatici. (Grammatici Graeci). Leipzig: Teubner.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Michael Cysouw

Authors
  1. Michael Cysouw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Cysouw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cysouw, M. The expression of person and number: a typologist’s perspective. Morphology 21, 419–443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9170-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9170-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation