Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination control strategy based on characteristic model for 3-bearing swivel duct nozzles

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A coordination control strategy is developed for 3-bearing swivel duct (3BSD) nozzles. A 3BSD nozzle’s deflection angle and direction are changed through rotations of three revolute pairs. There is a nonlinear relationship between the deflection angle/ direction and the rotation angles. The rotation speed of a revolute pair is limited by the power of the actuator. The moment of inertia and the aerodynamic load for each revolute pair are different and time-varying. A high-precision control system of 3BSD nozzles is required for applications on vertical and/or short take-off and landing (V/STOL) aircrafts. Difficulties of coordination control of 3BSD nozzles are distinct travel ranges, speed constraints, time-varying dynamic models, and disturbances. The proposed control strategy is a combination of the characteristic model and the dynamic control allocation method. A dynamic control allocation module is used as the coordination supervisor, which is aware of the kinematic model, the constraints, and the dynamic models of the revolute pairs. Second-order characteristic models are used to represent the dynamic behavior of the revolute pairs. The gradient projection algorithm is modified for parameter estimation. A modified all-coefficient adaptive controller is developed to reject the disturbances. Experimental results of a scaled 3BSD nozzle indicate that the coordination control strategy is effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang X L, Fan Y, Zhu J H. Transition flight control of two vertical/short takeoff and landing aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn, 2008, 31: 371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fan Y, Meng X Y, Yang X L, et al. Control allocation for a V/STOL aircraft based on robust fuzzy control. Sci China Inf Sci, 2011, 54: 1321–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neil M. A flexible jet fighter. Innovation, 2009, 10: 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gregory P W, David A A. X-35B STOVL flight control law design and flying qualities. In: Biennial International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Williamsburg, 2002. 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maddock I, Hirschberg M. The quest for stable jet borne vertical lift: ASTOVL to F-35 STOVL. In: AIAA Centennial of Naval Aviation Forum “100 Years of Achievement and Progress”, Los Angeles, 2011. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker G, Wurth S, Fuller J. F-35B integrated flight-propulsion control development. In: International Powered Lift Conference, Los Angeles, 2013. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mark D B. Highlights of the JSF STOVL jet effects test effort. In: Biennial International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Williamsburg, 2002. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X Y, Zhu J H, Zhang Y Y, et al. Kinematic modeling and test of the 3-bearing swivel duct nozzle (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin, 2014, 35: 911–920

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allan Y L, Alan S, Rebekah T, et al. Preliminary characterization of the altair lunar lander slosh dynamics and some implications for the thrust vector control design. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA, Toronto, Canada, 2010. 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y H, Lu H, Tian S L, et al. Posture control of electromechanical-actuator-based thrust vector system for aircraft engine. IEEE Trans Industrial Electronics, 2012, 59: 3561–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koo T J, Li R Q, Quottrup M M, et al. A framework for multi-robot motion planning from temporal logic specifications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 1675–1692

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui R X, Yan W S, Xu D M. Synchronization of multiple autonomous underwater vehicles without velocity measurements. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 1693–1703

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao Y, Zhang P, Liu H, et al. Optimal switching target-assignment based on the integral performance in cooperative tracking. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 1–14

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhuang Y, Gu M W, Wang W, et al. Multi-robot cooperative localization based on autonomous motion state estimation and laser data interaction. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 2240–2250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang C S, Li X L, Guo L, et al. A seamless operation mode transition control strategy for a microgrid based on master-slave control. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 1644–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan K K, Lim S Y, Huang S, et al. Coordinated motion control of moving gantry stages for precision applications based on an observer-augmented composite controller. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 2004, 12: 984–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gan Y H, Dai X Z. Survey of coordinated multiple manipulates control. Control Decision, 2013, 28: 321–333

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang W H, Qi N M, Ma J, et al. Neural integrated control for a free-floating space robot with suddenly changing parameters. Sci China Inf Sci, 2011, 54: 2091–2099

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gracia L, Sala A, Garelli F. Robot coordination using task-priority and sliding-mode techniques. Robot Comput Integrat Manuf, 2014, 30: 74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubrecht S, Padois V, Bidaud P, et al. Motion safety and constraints compatibility for multibody robots. Autonom Robots, 2012, 32: 333–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker L E. Distributed intelligence: Overview of the field and its application in multi-robot systems. J Phys Agents, 2008, 2: 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sen S, Ray G, Ghoshal T K. Dynamic control allocation for tracking time-varying control demand. J Guid Control Dyn, 2008, 31: 1150–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo Y, Serrani A, Yurkovich S, et al. Model predictive dynamic control allocation with actuator dynamics. In: American Control Conference, Boston, 2004. 1695–1700

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo Y, Serrani A, Yurkovich S, et al. Dynamic control allocation with asymptotic tracking of time-varying control trajectories. In: American Control Conference, Portland, 2005. 2098–2103

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu H X, Wu J, Xie Y C. Intelligent Adaptive Control Based on Characteristic Model (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Science and Technology Press, 2009. 76–78

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Z, Hu J. Stability analysis of a hypersonic vehicle controlled by the characteristic model based adaptive controller. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 2243–2256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu H X, Hu J, Xie Y C. Characteristic model-based all-coefficients adaptive control method and its applications. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyb, 2007, 37: 213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu J. All-coefficient adaptive reentry lifting control of manned spacecraft (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 1998, 19: 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meng B, Wu H X, Lin Z L, et al. Characteristic model based control of the X-34 reusable launch vehicle in its climbing phase. Sci China Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 2216–2225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H B, Sun Z Q, Min H B, et al. Fuzzy dynamic characteristic modeling and adaptive control of nonlinear systems and its application to hypersonic vehicles. Sci China Inf Sci, 2011, 54: 460–468

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu H X, Liu Y W, Liu Z H, et al. Characteristic modeling and the control of flexible structure. Sci China Ser E-Inf Sci, 2001, 31: 137–149

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang J C, Hu J, Ni M L. Adaptive guidance law design based on characteristic model for reentry vehicles. Sci China Inf Sci, 2008, 51: 2005–2021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou C J, Shi Y F, Yang S H. Characteristic model-based adaptive discrete-time sliding mode control for the swing arm in a Fourier transform spectrometer. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyb C: Appl Rev, 2012, 42: 1633–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leung S H, So C F. Gradient-based variable forgetting factor RLS algorithm in time-varying environments. IEEE Trans Sig Proc, 2005, 53: 3141–3150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Felix A. Improved variable forgetting factor recursive least square algorithm. In: 12th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics Vision, Guangzhou, 2012. 1789–1793

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen J, Ma T, Chen W J, et al. Unsupervised robust recursive least-squares algorithm for impulsive noise filtering. Sci China Inf Sci, 2013, 56: 1–10

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiHong Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Zhu, J., Yang, J. et al. Coordination control strategy based on characteristic model for 3-bearing swivel duct nozzles. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 2347–2356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5703-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5703-1

Keywords

Navigation