Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneur subsidiary of business groups from emerging markets: a multi-level perspective

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effects of firm resources on entrepreneur subsidiaries of business groups. Resource-based theory is the foundation for understanding how resource endowment drives firm growth as well as its effect on entrepreneur subsidiaries’ performance. With the growth strategy of business groups as the focus herein, our empirical research includes multi-level analysis and robustness analysis of the top 300 business groups in Taiwan and their 10,028 entrepreneur subsidiaries. The results from hierarchical linear modeling show that entrepreneur subsidiaries’ resources positively affect their performance. Business groups’ resources and growth strategy also positively impact their performance, thus confirming the multi-level phenomena. This study offers a practical contribution for business groups to have a better understanding of the applicability of a firm’s resources and for entrepreneur subsidiaries to execute a proper growth strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrieș, A. M., & Vîrlan, C. A. (2017). Risk arbitrage in emerging Europe: Are cross-border mergers and acquisition deals more risky? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 1367–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.

  • Benavides-Espinosa, M. M., & Roig-Dobón, S. (2011). The role of entrepreneurs in transferring knowledge through human resource management and joint venture. International Journal of Manpower, 32(1), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. H. (1975). Corporate growth and diversification. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.

  • Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Li, L. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., & Mare, C. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies. Lessons from Romania. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brlečić Valčić, S., & Bagarić, L. (2017). Return on strategic effectiveness – The need for synchronising growth and development strategies in the hotel industry using revenue management. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 1631–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, M. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis method. New Park. Sage: California.

  • Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (1996). HLM. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.

  • Canabal, A., & White, G. O., III. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33–48.

  • Clark, K., & Ramachandran, I. (2018). Subsidiary entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial opportunity: An institutional perspective. Journal of International Management In press.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.

  • Collis, D.J and Montgomery, C.A (1997). Corporate Strategy: Resources and The Scope of The Firm. Chicago: Mcgraw-Hill.

  • Errunza, V., & Senbet, L. (1984). International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. Journal of Finance, 36, 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. R., Shortell, S. M., & Young, G. J. (1997). Best practices in managing organized delivery systems. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 42(3), 299–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajam, V., & Gupta, A. K. (1985). Linking control system to business unit strategy: Impact on performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resources-based theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, C., & Jiang, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach. Journal of Business Research, 87, 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. U., & Park, J. H. (2006). Top team diversity, internationalization and the mediating effect of international alliances. British Journal of Management, 17, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. J., Chen, Y. M., & Lo, F. Y. (2014). The persistence of economic profit. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Yang, U. Y. (2018). On the growth of Korean Technoparks. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, F. Y. (2013). The dynamic adjustment of environment, strategy, structure, and resources on firm performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(2), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, F. Y., & Shu, M. K. (2016). Business Group’s diversification strategy and sustainability. International Journal of Business and Economics, 15(1), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, F. Y., Chiao, Y. C., & Yu, C. M. (2016). Network and institutional effects on SMEs’ entry strategies. Management International Review, 56(4), 531–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofti, M., Yousefi, A., & Jafari, S. (2018). The effect of emerging green market on green entrepreneurship and sustainable development in knowledge-based companies. Sustainability, 10(7), 2308–2326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2001). Determinants of entry in an emerging economy: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 443–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Verdu, F., Ribeiro, D., & Dobón, S. R. (2010). Government policies and services: An approach to the international context. The Service Industries Journal, 30(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. (1993). Industry and country effects on managers’ perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1179–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality? Journal of Business, 64, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Marqués, D., Roig-Dobón, S., & Comeig, I. (2017). Background factors to innovation performance: Results of an empirical study using fsQCA methodology. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1939–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. N. (2004). Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy. International Business Review, 13, 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Zeng, J. (2018). Some issues in recent entrepreneurship approaches: Joining previous and current theories. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2014). Management, 12/E. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambharya, R. B. (1995). The combined effect of international diversification and product diversification strategies on the performance of U.S.-based multinational companies. Management International Review, 35(3), 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. E., & Eden, L. (2004). What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? Multinational Business Review, 12, 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1989). A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(3), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the financial support of the project “Collaborative Economy, Social Economy and Welfare” (DER2015-65519-C2-1-R), financed by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Government of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Feng Chia University, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Fang-Yi Lo

  2. National Taipei University of Business, No. 321, Sec. 1, Jinan Rd., Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Kun-Huang Huarng

  3. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Andrea Rey-Martí

Authors
  1. Fang-Yi Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kun-Huang Huarng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Rey-Martí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun-Huang Huarng.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, FY., Huarng, KH. & Rey-Martí, A. Entrepreneur subsidiary of business groups from emerging markets: a multi-level perspective. Int Entrep Manag J 15, 471–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00563-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00563-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation