Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of networks for firm internationalization has been pointed out for several decades. Especially for small and new firms, networks have been found to be an important tool to gain access to resources and to overcome liabilities of newness, smallness and foreignness. Yet, there is a lack of understanding regarding which types of capabilities are developed through networking and how and when networks are used. The aim of this article is to explore how and when different networking activities develop critical capabilities during different phases of an international new venture’s early development. The article is based on a longitudinal, in-depth case study of a Swedish international new venture from the medical-technology industry. We find that the development process is greatly affected by how the individual key actors leverage their network ties to develop critical capabilities – they use existing network ties and different indirect ties during the pre-founding, start-up and establishment of production phases. During the commercialization and sales growth phases, however, many new network ties are developed. The heterogeneity of the individual actors’ backgrounds plays an important role during the different developmental phases. We conclude by advancing a number of propositions in relation to how critical capabilities are developed through networking during different developmental phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2008). Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achtenhagen, L., Melin, L., & Naldi, L. (2013). Dynamics of business models: strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agndal, H., & Chetty, S. (2007). The impact of relationships on changes in internationalization strategies of SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1449–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & B. W. Smilor (Eds.), Art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, T., & Styles, C. (2000). Viewpoint: the future of relational research in international marketing: constructs and conduits. International Marketing Review, 17(6), 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. (2011). International entrepreneurship, born globals and the theory of effectuation. Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development, 18(3), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., & Wictor, I. (2003). Innovative internationalisation in new firms: born globals the Swedish case. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., Evers, N., & Griot, C. (2013). Local and international networks in small firm internationalization: cases from the Rhône-Alpes medical technology regional cluster. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal, 25(9-10), 867–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, E., Lundberg, H., & Wincent, J. (2014). Processes in collaborative entrepreneurship: a longitudinal case study of how multiple actors exploit a radically new opportunity. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 713–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriani, P., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Beyond Gaussioan averages: redirecting international business and management research toward extreme events and power laws. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 1212–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehman, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Aldridge, T. T., & Sanders, M. (2011). Social capital building and new business formation: a case study in Silicon Valley. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., & Teece, J. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, 47, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazejewski, S. (2011). When truth is the daughter of time: Longitudinal case studies in international business research. In R. Piekkari, & C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 251–276). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, Y., Styles, C., & Wilkinson, I. E. (2012). An opportunity-based view of rapid internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 20(1), 74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2003). Explosive international growth and problems of success amongst small to medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 21(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., & Cox, M. (2006). The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4, 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2008). Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., Jr., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: a rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. M. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, N., & Knight, K. (2008). Role of international trade shows in small firm internationalization: a network perspective. International Marketing Review, 25(5), 544–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, N., Andersson, S., & Hannibal, M. (2012). Stakeholders and marketing capabilities in international new ventures: evidence from Ireland, Sweden, and Denmark. Journal of International Marketing, 20(4), 46–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K., & Madsen, T. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1351–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishammar, J., & Andersson, S. (2009). The overestimated role of strategic orientations for international performance in smaller firms. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghannad, N., & Andersson, S. (2012). The influence of the entrepreneur’s background on the behaviour and development of born globals’ internationalisation processes. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15(2), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Pechuan, I., Exposito-Langa, M., & Tomas-Miquel, J.-V. (2013). International entrepreneurship in SMEs: a study of influencing factors in the textile industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewerdine, L., & Welch, C. (2012). Are international new ventures really new? A process study of organizational emergence and internationalization. Journal of World Business. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.09.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Antonic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzschenreuter, T., Pedersen, T., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). The role of path dependency and managerial intentionality: a perspective on international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(7), 1055–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, S. L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, A. P. (2009). A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (1994). Building a global strategy. internationalizing small firms through local networking. Paper presented at the 39 th ICSB Annual World Conference. Strasbourg, June.

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1979). Generalizing from a single case study. Evaluation Review, 3(4), 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the Born Global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen, O., Puumalainen, K., Sintonen, S., & Kyläheiko, K. (2010). Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communications technology firms. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen, O., Saarenketo, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2012a). Start up patterns of internationalization: a framework and its application in the context of knowledge-intensive SMEs. European Management Journal, 30, 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., Saarenketo, S., & McNaughton, R. (2012b). Internationalization patterns of small and medium-sized enterprises. International Marketing Review, 29, 448–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurell, H., Andersson, S., & Achtenhagen, L. (2013). The importance of industry context for new venture internationalisation: a case study from the life sciences. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrand, A., Melén, S., & Nordman, E. R. (2011). Turning social capital into business: a case study of the internationalization of biotech SMEs. International Business Review, 20, 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loane, S., & Bell, J. (2006). Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand: an extension to the network approach. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loane, S., Bell, J. D., & McNaughton, R. (2007). A cross-national study on the impact of management teams on the rapid internationalization of small firms. Journal of World Business, 42, 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loane, S., Bell, J., & Cunningham, I. (2014). Entrepreneurial founding team exits in rapidly internationalising SMEs: a double edged sword. International Business Review, 23, 468–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massango, S., & Marinova, S. (2014). Knowledge-based network ties in early rapidly internationalising small firms: a missing link? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mort, S. G., & Weerawardena, J. (2006). Networking capability and international entrepreneurship: how networks function in Australian born global firms. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W., & Rieple, A. (2014). Special issue on “The role of networks in entrepreneurial performance: new answers to old questions?”. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2004). A global mindset: a prerequisite for successful internationalization. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A., Gilmore, A., Cummins, D., & Carson, D. (2001). The networks construct in entrepreneurship research: a review and critique. Management Decision, 39, 749–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1995). Global start-ups: entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiris, I. K., Akoorie, M. E. M., & Sinha, P. (2012). International entrepreneurship: a critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10, 279–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1997). What is a procesual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: for the lack of a boilerplate: tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, R. A., & Fischer, E. (1997). The influence of the management team’s international experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 807–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilla, N. (2016). In search of the interrelatedness of innovation and internationalisation processes in entrepreneurial life science companies. PhD Thesis, Department of Marketing and International Business, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland.

  • Royal Institute of Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital. (2007). Action MedTech—Key measures for growing the medical device industry in Sweden. www.ctmh.se/docs/ActionMedTech.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2013.

  • Salman, N., & Saives, A.-L. (2005). Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidén, L.-K. (2003). Medical devices in Sweden: Industrial structure, production and foreign trade 1985-2002. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigfusson, T., & Harris, S. (2012). The relationship formation paths of international entrepreneurs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotte-Kock, S., & Coviello, N. (2010). Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(1), 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderqvist, A. (2011). Opportunity exploration and exploitation in international new ventures: A study of relationships’ involvement in early entrepreneurial and internationalisation events. Doctoral dissertation, Hanken School of Economics, Vaasa, Finland.

  • Stremersch, S., & Van Dyck, W. (2009). Marketing of the life sciences: a new framework and research agenda for a nascent field. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2007). Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 211–227. doi:10.1002/sej.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1395–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thistoll, T., & Pauleen, D. (2010). Commercialising innovation internationally: a case study of social network and relationship management. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8, 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, D. (2010). Knowledge combination in networks: evidence from the international venturing of four small biotech firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(2), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, D., & Agndal, H. (2010). Network resource combinations in the international venturing of small biotech firms. Technovation, 30, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Engleman, R. M. (2004). Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. (2007). Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42, 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, C., Jones, M. V., Vlachos, G., & Dimitratos, P. (2011). Performance trade-offs: success, revenue and profitability. In M. V. Jones, C. Wheeler, & P. Dimitratos (Eds.), International entrepreneurship in the life sciences (pp. 213–226). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is part of a larger research project, and we acknowledge the financial support from the Swedish Research Council. We are grateful to the informants of the case company for their valuable efforts and time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hélène Laurell.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3

Table 3 From data analysis to results – example for phase 1 (pre-founding phase)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurell, H., Achtenhagen, L. & Andersson, S. The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development. Int Entrep Manag J 13, 113–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0398-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0398-3

Keywords

Navigation