Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From feminism to FemInc.ism: On the uneasy relationship between feminism, entrepreneurship and the Nordic welfare state

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feminism in the Nordic countries was primarily formulated in terms of ‘state feminism’. The women’s movement cooperated with feminist government officials and politicians, resulting in societies that can be considered to be the most gender-equal societies in the world. Historically, the state provided for a large publicly-financed welfare sector which made it possible for many women to combine work and family through the state’s implementation of family-friendly policies, while simultaneously providing employment opportunities for many women. However, since the financial crisis of the 1990s, there has been a political change influenced by neo-liberal thought, in which politicians have handed over the welfare state’s responsibilities to the market, and, instead, the politicians have encouraged entrepreneurship, not least among women. Further to this development, there has been a change in emphasis from entrepreneurship (understood as starting and running a business) to entrepreneurialism which, in addition to a belief in the efficacy of market forces, also contains a social dimension where individuals are supposed to be flexible and exercise choice. In this article, we ask whether this entails a change in the feminist project in the Nordic countries, and if so, what the likely consequences are for this project, both in practice and in research. In order to answer this question, we reviewed existing Nordic research on women’s entrepreneurship and examined how this body of work conceptualizes entrepreneurship, gender, the state, and equality. We also considered whether any trends could be identified. We relate our findings to recent changes in government policy and conclude that the current discourse on entrepreneurship challenges, and possibly weakens, state feminism, but we also conclude that this discourse may also provide space for new forms of feminist action, in market terms. We coin the term FemInc.ism to denote feminist action through enterprise and we discuss a number of important challenges that research on this phenomenon is faced with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A search using ‘wom*’, and ‘entrepren*’ in Google Scholar generated over 18000 hits. We soon realized that determining the relevance of the texts, or the country of origin for each text, would not be possible within the time frame of the present research.

  2. The authors have published extensively on gender and entrepreneurship since 1997, with more than 200 papers altogether. 2012–2016 they collaborate in a research project on feminist perspectives on entrepreneurship, financed by the Swedish Science foundation. See www.emblaresearch.se.

References

  • Achtenhagen, L., & Tillmar, M. (2013). Studies on women’s entrepreneurship from Nordic Countries and beyond: Editorial. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H. (2007). Gender stereotypes. In S. Clegg & J. Bailey (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies (pp. 544–547). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H. (2011). Politik för kvinnors företagande i Sverige och USA [Policy for women’s entrepreneurship in Sweden and in the USA]. In E. Blomberg, G. Hedlund, & M. Wottle (Eds.), Kvinnors företagande - mål eller medel? (pp. 292–322). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahl, H., &Nelson, T. (2014) Howpolicy positionswomen entrepreneurs: A comparative analysis of state discoursein Sweden and the United States, Journal of Business Venturing (2014),http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.002

  • Al-Dajani, H., & Marlow, S. (2014). Displaced women’s entrepreneurship as an articulation of political activism. Paper presented at the Diana International Research Conference 2014, Stockholm,

  • Alsos, G., Isaksen, E. J., & Ljunggren, E. (2006). New venture financing and subsequent business growth in men- and women led businesses. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 667–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsos, G., & Ljunggren, E. (1998). Does the business start-up process differ by gender? A longitudinal study of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 6(4), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsos, G., Steen Jensen, R., & Ljunggren, E. (2010). Gender and entrepreneurship: revealing constructions and underlying processes - the case of Norway. In C. Brush, A. De Bruin, E. J. Gatewood, & C. Henry (Eds.), Women entrepreneurs and the global environment for growth (pp. 40–56). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anxo, D., Ericson, T., & Mångs, A. (2011). Kvinnors företagande - en strategi för att lösa livspusslet? [Women’s entrepreneurship - a way to solve the life puzzle?]. In E. Blomberg, G. Hedlund, & M. Wottle (Eds.), Kvinnors företagande - mål eller medel? (pp. 266–289). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Autio, E. (2006). Financing of small businesses: are Mars and Venus more alike than different? Venture Capital, 8(02), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2006). Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women’s self-employment preference in the Nordic countries. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination; studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, H., & Trägårdh, L. (2006). Är svenskan människa? Gemenskap och oberoende i det moderna Sverige [Is the Swede human? Solidarity and independence in modern Sweden]. Stockholm: Norstedts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K. (2012a). Friends, Feelings, and Fantasy: the entrepreneurial approach as conceptualized by preschool teachers. In K. Berglund, B. Johannisson, & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Societal entrepreneurship: Positioning, Penetrating, Promoting (pp. 191–213). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K. (2012b). The queer potential of women entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Gender, Work and Organization conference, Keele, UK, June 27–29, 2012

  • Berglund, K. (2012c). Jakten på entreprenörer: om öppningar och låsningar i entreprenörskapsdiskursen [The hunt for entrepreneurs – cracks and deadlocks in the entrepreneurship discourse]. Stockholm: Santérus Academic Press

  • Berglund, K. (2013). Fighting against all odds: Entrepreneurship education as employability training. Ephemera, 13(4), 717–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K., & Granat Thorslund, J. (2010). The perfect M(is)s Match: promoting women’s entrepreneurship - business as ususal or an arena for subversive practices? Paper presented at the Gender, Work and Organization conference, Keele, UK, June 27–29, 2012

  • Berglund, K., & Granat Thorslund, J. (2012). Innovative policies? Entrepreneurship and innovation policy from a gender perspective. In S. Andersson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, & E. Sundin (Eds.), Promoting Innovation: Policies, practices and procedure. Vinnova: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K., & Holmgren, C. (2008). Entreprenörskap och Ordning och reda…hur hänger de(t) ihop? [Entrepreneurship and law and order - how do they mix?]. In K. Berglund & A. W. Johansson (Eds.), Arenor för entreprenörskap (pp. 32–51). Örebro: Forum för småföretagsforskning FSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K., & Holmgren, C. (2013). Entrepreneurship education in policy and practice - On tensions and conflicts in processes of implementing entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 5(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K., & Johansson, A. W. (2007). Entrepreneurship, Discourses and Conscientization in Processes of Regional Development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(6), 499–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjursell, C., & Melin, L. (2011). Proactive and reactive plots: Narratives in entrepreneurial identity construction. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 218–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, K. A. (2010). The paradox of gender equality: An entrepreneurial case study from Sweden. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidford, P., Stone, I., & Tesfaye, B. (2013). Gender, disadvantage and enterprise support - lessons from women’s business centers in North America and Europe. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur-mentality, gender and the study of women entrepreneurs. Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the Boundaries: Reframing “Entrepreneurship as Social Change‴ Through Feminist Perspectives. The Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callerstig, A.-C. (2012). Public servants as agents for change in gender mainstreaming – The complexity of practice. In S. Andersson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, & E. Sundin (Eds.), Promoting Innovation: Policies, practices and procedures (pp. 239–269). Stockholm: Vinnova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantzler, I., & Leijon, S. (2007). Team-oriented women entrepreneurs: a way to modern management. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(4), 732–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (1997). A four times told tale: Combining narrative and scientific knowledge in organization studies. Organization, 4(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, H. M. (2012). Neo-liberalism meets the nordic welfare-state: Gaps and silences. NORA Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(4), 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalborg, C., von Friedrichs, Y., & Wincent, J. (2012). Beyond the numbers: Qualitative growth in women’s businesses. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dareblom, J. (2005). Prat, politik och praktik: om individers möten med strukturer i en kommunal satsning på kvinnors företagande [Talk, politics and practice: individuals facing structures in a project for women’s entrepreneurship]. Stockholm: Handelshögskolan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, S. E., & Sanders, M. L. (2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P. (2004). Against Enterprise (but not against ‘enterprise’ for that would be silly). Organization, 11(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuRietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenheim, S., & Rönnblom, M. (2012). Tracking down politics and power in neo-liberal society. NORA Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(4), 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., Henttonen, E., & Merilainen, S. (2008a). The growth strategies of women-controlled SME’s: a case study on FInnish software companies. International Journal of Business Excellence, 1(4), 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., Henttonen, E., & Merilainen, S. (2008b). Managerial work and gender - ethnography of cooperative relationships in small software companies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(4), 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., Katila, S., & Niskanen, M. (2009). Gender and sources of finance in Finnish SME’s: a contextual view. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 176–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, L., & Ljunggren, E. (2006). Women’s entrepreneurship in Norway: recent trends and future challenges. In C. Brush, N. M. Carter, E. J. Gatewood, P. Greene, & M. Hart (Eds.), Growth oriented women entrepreneurs and their businesses: a global research perspective (pp. 154–183). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, T. (1996). Potential businesswomen in the public sector. In Nutek (Ed.), Aspects of women’s entrepreneurship Nutek B 1996:10 (pp. 179–202). Stockholm: Nutek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fältholm, Y., Abrahamsson, L., & Källhammer, E. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship: gendered discourses and ghettos. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatewood, E. J., Greene, P. G., & Thulin, P. (2014). Sweden and the United States: Differing entrepreneurial conditions require different policies. In P. Braunerhjelm (Ed.), 20 years of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 95–108). Stockholm: Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawell, M. (2014). Soci(et)al entrepreneurship and different forms of social enterprises. In A. Lundström, Y. von Friedrichs, E. Sundin, & C. Zhou (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship: Creating New Ideas for the Future. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, A., Stridh, K., Blomkvist, M., & Ulvenblad, P. (2010). A gender perspective on national measures promoting innovation and entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the Gender, Work and Organization conference, Keele, UK

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedfeldt, M. (2008). Företagande kvinnor i bruksort: arbetsliv och vardagsliv i samspel [Enterprising women in industrial communities: interplay of working life and everyday life]. Örebro: Örebro universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedfeldt, M. (2011). Verkliga och imaginära företagande kvinnor [Real and imaginary enterprising women]. In E. Blomberg, G. Hedlund, & M. Wottle (Eds.), Kvinnors företagande - mål eller medel? [Women’s entrepreneurship - means or ends?] (pp. 114–138). Stockholm: SNS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2013). Parallel Lines? A Thirty-Year Review of Methodological Approaches in Gender and Entrepreneurship Research Paper presented at the ISBE Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Cardiff, UK, Nov 2013

  • Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and women power. Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, C. (2002). Integration mellan genus- och entreprenörskapsteori - är det möjligt och/eller önskvärt? [Integrating gender and entrepreneruship theory – is it possible and/or desirable?]. In C. Holmquist & E. Sundin (Eds.), Företagerskan. Om kvinnor och entreprenörskap (pp. 47–67). Stockholm: SNS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, C. (2009). Varför ska man främja kvinnors företagande? [Why should women’s entrepreneurship be supported?]. In H. Carin, A. Barle, & K. Winnermark (Eds.), Varför ska man främja kvinnors företagande? (pp. 7–40). Stockholm: Nutek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist, C., & Sundin, E. (1990). What’s special about highly educated women entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2(2), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hytti, U. (2005). New meanings for entrepreneurs: from risk-taking heroes to safe-seeking professionals. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(6), 594–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hytti, U. (2010). Contextualizing entrepreneurship in the boundaryless career. Gender in Management, 25(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannello, K. (1992). Decisions without hierarchy. Feminist interventions in organization theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javefors Grauers, E. (2002). Profession, genus och företagarpar: en studie av advokater och köpmän. Doktorsavhandling. [Profession, gender and business-couples: comparing lawyers to merchants. Doctoral thesis]. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. E., Breitkreuz, R. S., & James, A. E. (2013). When family members are also business owners: Is entrepreneurship good for families? Family Relations, 62(3), 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J., & Outshoorn, J. (2007). Changing state feminism. In J. Outshoorn & J. Kantola (Eds.), Changing state feminism (pp. 1–19). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J., & Squires, J. (2012). From state feminism to market feminism? Intenational Political Science Review, 33(4), 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautonen, T., & Palmroos, J. (2010). The impact of a necessity-based start-up on subsequent entrepreneurial satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klyver, K. (2011). Gender differences in entrepreneurial networks: Adding an alter perspective. Gender in Management, 26(5), 332–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L., Shane, S., & Westhead, P. (1993). Is it equally difficult for female entrepreneurs to start businesses in all countries? Journal of Small Business Management, 31(4), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komulainen, K., Korhonen, M., & Räty, H. (2009). Risk‐taking abilities for everyone? Finnish entrepreneurship education and the enterprising selves imagined by pupils. Gender and Education, 21(6), 631–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komulainen, K., Naskali, P., Korhonen, M., & Keskitalo-Foley, S. (2011). Internal Entrepreneurship—a Trojan horse of the neoliberal governance of education? Finnish pre- and in-service teachers’ implementation of and resistance towards entrepreneurship education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 341–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, M., Komulainen, K., & Räty, H. (2012). “Not everyone is cut out to be the entrepreneur type”: How Finnish school teachers construct the meaning of entrepreneurship education and the related abilities of the pupils. Nordic Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalainen, A. (1995). At the margins of the economy. Women’s self-employment in Finland, 1960–1990. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalainen, A. (2004). Rethinking the revival of social capital and trust in social theory: Possibilities for feminist analysis. In B. L. Marshall & A. Witz (Eds.), Engendering the social: feminist encounters with sociological theory (pp. 155–170). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalainen, A., & Österberg-Högstedt, J. (2013). Entrepreneurship within social and health care – a question of identity, gender and professionalism. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon Lundell, Å. (2012). Sminkad superhjältinna eller leende lagomföretagare? Företagarförebilder i pressen. Stockholm: Tillväxtverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffler, E. (2006). Företagsamma elever: Diskurser kring entreprenörskap och företagsamhet i skolan. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2001). The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M. (2004). Woman, teacher, entrepreneur: On identity construction in female entrepreneurs of Swedish independent schools. Paper presented at the EIASM conference, Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, Nov 17–19

  • Ljunggren, E., & Alsos, G. A. (2007). Media expressions of entrepreneurs: Presentations and discourses of male and female entrepreneurs in Norway. In N. M. Carter, C. Henry, B. Ó. Cinnéide, & K. Johnston (Eds.), Female entrepreneurship: Implications for education, training and policy (pp. 88–109). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren, E., & Kolvereid, L. (1996). New business formation: does gender make a difference? Women in Management Review, 11(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S. (2014). Exploring future research agendas in the field of gender and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2012). Advancing debate: An epistemological critique of the relationship between gender, entrepreneurship and firm performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19(1), 6–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2000). Post-modern free-market feminism: a conversation with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Rethinking Marxism, 12(4), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani, K. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: new directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(4), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neergaard, H., Frederiksen, S. H., & Marlow, S. The Emperor’s new Clothes: Rendering a Feminist Theory of Entrepreneurship visible. In International Council for Small Business (ICSB). World Conference Proceedings: 1–36, Stockholm, 2011 (pp. 1–36): ICSB Washington

  • Neergaard, H., Nielsen, K. T., & Kjeldsen, J. I. (2006). State of the art of women’s entrepreneurship, access to financing and financing strategies in Denmark. In C. Brush, N. M. Carter, E. J. Gatewood, P. Greene, & M. Hart (Eds.), Growth oriented women entrepreneurs and their businesses: a global research perspective (pp. 88–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neergaard, H., & Thrane, C. (2011). The Nordic Welfare Model: barrier or facilitator of women’s entrepreneurship in Denmark? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (1997). Business counselling services directed towards female entrepreneurs—some legitimacy dilemmas. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(3), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (2010). Constructing p(e)ace-makers for women’s enterprise. In F. Bill, B. Bjerke, & A. W. Johansson (Eds.), (De)Mobilizing the entrepreneurship discourse (pp. 15–36). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutek. (2007). Utfall och styrning av statliga insatser för kapitalförsörjning ur ett könsperspektiv [Outcome and governance of state support for capital provision from a gender perspective]. Stockholm: Nutek.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). OECDiLibrary: Total tax revenue as a percentage of GDP. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/total-tax-revenue_20758510-table 2. Accessed June 29, 2014.

  • Pettersson, K. (2004). Masculine entrepreneurship - the Gnosjö discourse in a feminist perspective. In D. Hjorth & C. Steyaert (Eds.), Narrative and discursive approaches in entrepreneurship (pp. 177–193). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, K. (2012). Support for women’s entrepreneurship—A Nordic spectrum. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, K., & Hedberg, C. (2013). Moving out of ‘their places’? – Immigrant women care entrepreneurs in Sweden. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Writing organization as gendered practice: interrupting the libidinal economy. Organization Studies, 35(3), 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A. M., & Watson, J. (2012). Gender differences in firm performance: evidence from new ventures in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 544–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(01), 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (Ed.). (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, K. W. (2003). An exploratory study of women in micro enterprises: gender-related differences. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, U., Wold, A., Jordansson, B., Ohlsson, B., & Smedberg, Å. (2010). Hans Excellens: om miljardsatsningarna på starka forskningsmiljöer [His excellency: on the investment of billions on strong research centers]. Stockholm: Delegationen för jämställdhet i högskolan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Kolvereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm foundation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sköld, B. (2013). Strukturerna och företagandet: En longitudinell studie av kvinnors och mäns företagande i spåren av offentlig sektors omvandling [Structures and business ownership: A longitudinal study of women's and men's business-ownership in the wake of public sector transformation] (Licenciatavhandling). Linköping: Linköpings Universitet

  • Spilling, O. R., & Berg, N. G. (2000). Gender and small business management: the case of Norway in the 1990:s. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. (2012). Women and men in Sweden. Örebro: Statistiska centralbyrån.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, L. (2012). Den regionala utvecklingens logik i policy och praktik: en fallstudie av den regionalpolitiska interventionen Resurscentra för kvinnor [The logic of regional development in policy and practice]. Västerås: Mälardalens högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (1990). Some methodological problems associated with researching women entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4–5), 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, C., & Hjorth, D. (Eds.). (2006). Entrepreneurship as social change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E. (2002). Företagandets manliga prägling [The male gender-labelling of entrepreneurship]. In C. Holmqvist & E. Sundin (Eds.), Företagerskan - om kvinnors entreprenörskap (pp. 27–46). Stockholm: SNS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E. (2011). Entrepreneurship and the reorganization of the public sector: A gendered story. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(4), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Holmquist, C. (1989). Kvinnor som företagare. Osynlighet, mångfald, anpassning [Women entrepreneurs: invisibility, diversity, adjustment]. Malmö: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Rapp, G. (2006). Städerskorna som försvann, Individen i den offentliga sektorn [The cleaners who dissappeared: The individual in the public sector]. Arbetsliv i omvandling. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Rapp, G. (2011). Att främja kvinnors företagande - exemplet Östergötland [Supporting women’s entrepreneurship—the Östergötland example]. Helix working papers. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Thörnqvist, A. (2006). När anställda blir företagare: Strukturomvandling och nya organisationsformer i ägande och arbete [When employees become self-employed: Structural change and new organizational forms in ownership and work]. Arbetsliv i omvandling. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Tillmar, M. (2010a). The masculinization of the elderly care sector: local-level studies of public sector outsourcing. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, E., & Tillmar, M. (2010b). Varför ska kvinnor starta företag inom vård och omsorg? [Why should women start care businesses?]. Stockholm: Tillväxtverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmar, M. (2007). Gendered small business assistance: lessons from a Swedish project. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(2), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillmar, M. (2009). Societal Entrepreneurs in the Health Sector—Crossing the Frontiers. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillväxtverket. (2012). Hur kan företagsstöden bli mer jämställda? Förslag på åtgärder som skapar förutsättningar för en mer jämställd resursfördelning vad avser beviljande av företagsstöd. Rapport 0151 [How can business support become more gender equal?]. Stockholm: Tillväxtverket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulvenblad, P., Blomkvist, M., & Winborg, J. (2011). Academic entrepreneurship – the structure of incubator management and best practice reported on Swedish business incubators’ websites. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(4), 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNdata (2012). Gender Inequality Index. http://data.un.org/DocumentData.aspx?q=HDI+&id=332. Accessed Feb 19 2014.

  • Watson, J. (2002). Comparing the performance of male- and female-controlled businesses: relating outputs to inputs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(3), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualising entrepreneurship: conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wottle, M., & Blomberg, E. (2011). Feminism och jämställdhet i en nyliberal kontext 1990–2010 [Feminism and gender equality in a neo-liberal context 1990–2010]. Tidskrift för Genusvetenskap, 2–3, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helene Ahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahl, H., Berglund, K., Pettersson, K. et al. From feminism to FemInc.ism: On the uneasy relationship between feminism, entrepreneurship and the Nordic welfare state. Int Entrep Manag J 12, 369–392 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0341-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0341-4

Keywords

Navigation