Skip to main content
Log in

Biochar increased water holding capacity but accelerated organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in China

  • Selected Papers from the 2nd Contaminated Land, Ecological Assessment and Remediation (CLEAR 2014) Conference: Environmental Pollution and Remediation
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hydrologically contained field study, to assess biochar (produced from mixed crop straws) influence upon soil hydraulic properties and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching, was conducted on a loamy soil (entisol). The soil, noted for its low plant-available water and low soil organic matter, is the most important arable soil type in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River catchment, China. Pore size distribution characterization (by N2 adsorption, mercury intrusion, and water retention) showed that the biochar had a tri-modal pore size distribution. This included pores with diameters in the range of 0.1–10 μm that can retain plant-available water. Comparison of soil water retention curves between the control (0) and the biochar plots (16 t ha−1 on dry weight basis) demonstrated biochar amendment to increase soil water holding capacity. However, significant increases in DOC concentration of soil pore water in both the plough layer and the undisturbed subsoil layer were observed in the biochar-amended plots. An increased loss of DOC relative to the control was observed upon rainfall events. Measurements of excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence indicated the DOC increment originated primarily from the organic carbon pool in the soil that became more soluble following biochar incorporation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar L, Thibodeaux LJ (2005) Kinetics of peat soil dissolved organic carbon release from bed sediment to water. Part 1. Laboratory simulation. Chemosphere 58:1309–1318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE et al (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM et al (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer JN, Groffman PM (1996) Bioavailability of water extractable organic carbon fractions in forest and agricultural soil profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 28:783–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodowski S, Amelung W, Haumaier L et al (2005) Morphological and chemical properties of black carbon in physical soil fractions as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Geoderma 128:116–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS et al (2013) Can biochar reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions from a Miscanthus bioenergy crop? GCB Bioenergy 6:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA et al (2003) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chow AT, Tanji KK, Gao S et al (2006) Temperature, water content and wet-dry cycle effects on DOC production and carbon mineralization in agricultural peat soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:477–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis WM, Khlosi M, Hartmann R et al (2005) Comparison of unimodal analytical expressions for the soil-water retention curve. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1902–1911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dane JH, Hopmans JW, Romano N et al (2002) Soil water retention and storage-laboratory methods. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 4-physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 675–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter AR (2004) Soil physical quality. Part I: theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan E, Verhoef A, Robinson S et al (2010) Bio-char from sawdust, maize stover and charcoal: Impact on water holding capacities (WHC) of three soils from Ghana. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 8:1–6

  • Gerrity D, Gamage S, Jones D et al (2012) Development of surrogate correlation models to predict trace organic contaminant oxidation and microbial inactivation during ozonation. Water Res 46:6257–6272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greeg SJ, Sing KSW (1982) Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggenberger G, Rodionov A, Shibistova O et al (2008) Storage and mobility of black carbon in permafrost soils of the forest tundra ecotone in Northern Siberia. Glob Chang Biol 14:1367–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RK, Baker A, Murphy KR et al (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43:863–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Ruiz S, Abrell L, Wickramasekara S et al (2012) Quantifying PPCP interaction with dissolved organic matter in aqueous solution: combined use of fluorescence quenching and tandem mass spectrometry. Water Res 46:943–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hockaday WC, Grannas AM, Kim S et al (2007) The transformation and mobility of charcoal in a fire-impacted watershed. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 71:3432–3445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson T, Sager E, Guéguen C (2014) Characterization of biochar-derived dissolved organic matter using UV-visible adsorption and excitation-emission fluorescence spectroscopies. Chemosphere 103:197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M et al (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jien SH, Wang CS (2013) Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena 110:225–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I et al (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity-results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kookana RS (2010) The role of biochar in modifying the environmental fate, bioavailability, and efficacy of pesticides in soils: a review. Aust J Soil Res 48:627–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korshin GV, Wu WW, Benjamin MM et al (2002) Correlations between differential absorbance and the formation of individual DBPs. Water Res 36:3273–3282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD et al (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C et al (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500 °C. Bioresour Technol 148:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 11:403–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu SG, Sun FF, Zong YT (2014) Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (Vertisol). Catena 114:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR (2013) Organic carbon and nutrient release from a range of laboratory-produced biochars and biochar-soil mixtures. Geoderma 193–194:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2001) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen V, Ruysschaert G, Manka'Abusi D et al (2015) Impact of a woody biochar on properties of a sandy loam soil and spring barley during a two-year field experiment. Eur J Agron 62:65–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peake LR, Tang X, Reid BJ (2014) Quantifying the influence of biochar on the physical and hydrological properties of dissimilar soils. Geoderma 235–236:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds WD, Drury CF, Yang XM et al (2007) Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil Tillage Res 96:316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Science Glossary Terms Committee (2008) Glossary of Soil Science Terms 2008. Soil Science Society of America, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1996) Cycles of soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients (second ed.). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Mäkelä P et al (2014) Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions: effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat, turnip rape and faba bean. Plant Soil 374:89–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veksha A, McLaughlin H, Layzell DB et al (2014) Pyrolysis of wood to biochar: increasing yield while maintaining microporosity. Bioresour Technol 153:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vomocil J, Flocker W (1965) Degradation of structure of Yolo loam by compaction. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillarity flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, You CF (2013) Water holding capacity and absorption properties of wood chars. Energy Fuel 27:2643–2648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this work is provided by Nature Science Foundation of China (41301549, 21307152, and 41471268), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M530408), and CAS-SAFEA International Partnership Project (KZZD-EW-TZ-06). Thanks also goes to the Hundred Talents Program of CAS for supporting activities related to the data processing and preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangyu Tang or Hui Sun.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 384 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 43 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Wang, H., Tang, X. et al. Biochar increased water holding capacity but accelerated organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 995–1006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4885-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4885-9

Keywords

Navigation