Abstract
This study argues that different cities in China have different resource environments available for NGOs. Organizations react to these resource environments by constructing appropriate resource strategies, which in turn shape the characteristics and structures of the NGOs of that city. It further examines how these characteristics and structures influence the construction and performance of citizenship in an authoritarian environment. Specifically, some types of NGOs encourage Chinese citizens to be passive, while others offer a model for people to actively engage with social issues. This is aptly demonstrated in an analysis of NGOs operating across four cities—Beijing, Shanghai, Kunming, and Nanjing—which reveals three different types of resource environments and behavioral models for NGOs. We subsequently discuss the implications of each model for citizen engagement.
Résumé
La présente étude avance que diverses villes de Chine mettent à disposition des ONG différents environnements de ressources. Les organisations réagissent à ces derniers en mettant sur pied des stratégies de ressource appropriées qui, en retour, définissent les caractéristiques et structures des ONG de la ville donnée. Elle examine de plus la façon dont ces caractéristiques et structures influencent le développement et le rendement de la citoyenneté dans un environnement autoritaire. De façon plus précise, certains types d’ONG encouragent les citoyens chinois à être passifs, tandis que d’autres offrent à la population un modèle d’engagement actif dans le cadre d’enjeux sociaux. Cette situation est justement démontrée dans l’analyse d’ONG exploitées dans quatre villes, Beijing, Shanghaï, Kunming et Nanjing. Celle-ci révèle trois types différents d’environnements de ressources et de modèles comportementaux à la disposition des ONG. Nous discutons plus loin des implications de chaque modèle pour l’engagement citoyen.
Zusammenfassung
In dieser Studie wird behauptet, dass NROs in verschiedenen Städten Chinas unterschiedliche Ressourcenumgebungen vorfinden. Die Organisationen reagieren auf diese Ressourcenumgebungen, indem sie angemessene Ressourcenstrategien entwickeln, die wiederum die Merkmale und Strukturen der NROs in der jeweiligen Stadt prägen. Es wird weiter untersucht, wie sich diese Merkmale und Strukturen auf die Entwicklung und Leistungsfähigkeit der Bürgerschaft in einem autoritären Umfeld auswirken. Einige Arten von NROs fordern die chinesischen Bürger zur Passivität auf, während andere den Menschen ein Modell für eine aktive Auseinandersetzung mit sozialen Problemen anbieten. Dies wird in einer Analyse von NROs in den vier Städten Peking, Shanghai, Kunming und Nanjing angemessen demonstriert, wobei drei unterschiedliche Arten von Ressourcenumgebungen und Verhaltensmodellen für NROs herausgestellt werden. Anschließend werden die Implikationen der einzelnen Modelle für das Bürgerengagement diskutiert.
Resumen
El presente estudio argumenta que diferentes ciudades en China tienen diferentes entornos de recursos disponibles para las ONG. Las organizaciones reaccionan a estos entornos de recursos construyendo estrategias de recursos apropiadas, que a su vez dan forma a las características y estructuras de las ONG de dicha ciudad. Asimismo, examina cómo estas características y estructuras influyen en la construcción y en la actuación de la ciudadanía en un entorno autoritario. Específicamente, algunos tipos de ONG alientan a los ciudadanos chinos a que sean pasivos, mientras que otros ofrecen un modelo para que las personas se impliquen de manera activa en cuestiones sociales. Esto queda ampliamente demostrado en un análisis de ONG que operan en cuatro ciudades - Beijing, Shanghai, Kunming y Nanjing - que revela tres tipos diferentes de entornos de recursos y modelos comportamentales para las ONG. Tratamos posteriormente las implicaciones de cada modelo con respecto al compromiso de los ciudadanos.
摘要
本研究讨论以下问题:在中国不同的城市里,NGO 具有不同的可用资源环境。组织通过建立适当的资源战略来应对这些资源环境,而这些战略反过来又塑造了该城市NGO的特征和结构。文章还进一步探讨了这些特征和结构如何影响专制环境中公民权的构建和表现。特别是,某些类型的NGO鼓励中国公民表现被动,而其他NGO则为人们提供主动地参与社会问题的方式。对在四座城市(北京、上海、昆明和南京)里运营的NGO进行分析,结果适当地展示了这一点,其中揭示了NGO的三种不同类型资源环境和行为模型。随后我们讨论了每种模型对于公民参与的影响。.
ملخص
تجادل هذه الدراسة أن مدن مختلفة في الصين لديها بيئات مختلفة من الموارد المتاحة للمنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO). المنظمات ترد على موارد البيئات عن طريق بناء إستراتيجيات الموارد المناسبة، التي بدورها تشكل خصائص وهياكل المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO) من تلك المدينة. تدرس أيضا كيف أن هذه الخصائص والهياكل تؤثر على البناء واأداء المواطنة في بيئة إستبدادية. على وجه التحديد، بعض أنواع من المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO) تشجع المواطنين الصينيين إلى أن يكونوا سلبيين، في حين أن البعض الآخر يقدم نموذج للناس للمشاركة بنشاط مع القضايا الإجتماعية. يتجلى هذا على نحو مناسب في تحليل المنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO) العاملة في أربع مدن - بكين وشنغهاي وكونمينج، ونانجينج- الذي يكشف عن ثلاثة أنواع مختلفة من موارد بيئات ونماذج سلوكية للمنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO). نحن بعد ذلك نناقش الآثار المترتبة على كل نموذج لإشراك المواطنين.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In China, the term NGO (fei zhenfu zuzhi) does not have a particularly clear or consistent definition, legally or popularly. It is regularly used interchangeably with “social organization” (shehui zuzhi), “public benefit organization” (gongyi zuzhi), “charitable organization” (cishan zuzhi), and “popular organization” (minjian zuzhi).
While strictly speaking, Kunming NGOs are better funded based on a per capita basis, they are still less likely to receive international support than their Beijing or Shanghai counterparts due to their location and scale (which are factors, we contend, reduce their competitiveness)..
References
Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1–4.
Boies, J., & Prechel, H. (2002). Capital dependence, business political behavior, and change to the multilayered subsidiary form. Social Problems, 49(3), 301–326.
Brulle, R. J., & Jenkins, C. (2005). Foundations and the environmental movement. In D. R. Faber & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and popular movements (pp. 151–183). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Clemens, E. S. (1997). The people’s lobby: Organizational innovation and the rise of interest group politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, M. (2015). China’s Top 20 Cities for millionaires revealed. Mingtiandi. http://www.mingtiandi.com/real-estate/agencies-people/chinas-top-20-cities-for-millionaires-revealed/.
Cooper, C. M. (2006). This is our way in: The civil society of environmental NGOs in South-West China. Government and Opposition, 41(1), 109–136.
de Tocqueville, A. (1988). Democracy in America. G. Lawrence (Trans.). New York: Perennial Library.
Dillon, N. (2007). New democracy and the demise of private charity in Shanghai. In J. Brown & P. G. Pickowicz (Eds.), Dilemmas of victory: The early years of the People’s Republic of China (pp. 80–102). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Economy, E. (2010). The river runs black: The environmental challenge to China’s future (2nd ed.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.
Frolic, M. (1997). State-led civil society. In T. Brook & M. Frolic (Eds.), Civil society in China (pp. 46–67). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Gaudreau, M., & Cao, H. (2015). Political constraints on adaptive governance environmental NGO networks in Nanjing, China. The Journal of Environment and Development, 24(4), 418–444.
Gramsci, A. (1980). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Haddad, M. A. (2006). Civic responsibility and patterns of voluntary participation around the world. Comparative Political Studies, 39(10), 1220–1242.
Hasmath, R., Hildebrandt, T., & Hsu, J. (2016). Conceptualizing government-organized non-governmental organizations across contexts. Paper Presented at Development Studies Association Annual Meeting (September 12–14). Oxford, UK.
Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (2008). NGOs in China: Issues of good governance and accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30(1), 1–11.
Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (2014). Isomorphic pressures, epistemic communities and state-NGO collaboration in China. The China Quarterly, 220, 936–954.
Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (Eds.). (2015a). NGO governance and management in China. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. Y. J. (2015b). Communities of practice and the NGO sector in China. Paper Presented at Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action Conference (November 19–21). Chicago.
Haveman, H. (1992). Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 48–72.
He, B. (1997). The democratic implications of civil society in China. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Hess, D. J. (2009). The potentials and limitations of civil society research: Getting undone science done. Sociological Inquiry, 79(3), 306–327.
Hildebrandt, T. (2013). Social organizations and the authoritarian state in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Howell, J. (1996). NGO-state relations in post-Mao China. In D. Hulme & M. Edwards (Eds.), NGOs, States and Donors (pp. 202–215). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Howell, J. (2004). New directions in civil society: Organizing around marginalized interests. In J. Howell (Ed.), Governance in China (pp. 143–171). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hsu, C. L. (2006). Market ventures, moral logics, and ambiguity: Crafting a new organizational form in post-Socialist China. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(1), 62–92.
Hsu, C. L. (2008). Rehabilitating charity in China: The case of Project Hope and the rise of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 4(2), 81–96.
Hsu, C. L., & Jiang, Y. (2015). An institutional approach to Chinese NGOs: State alliance versus state avoidance resource strategies. The China Quarterly, 221, 100–122.
Hsu, J. Y. J. (2012). Spaces of civil society: The role of migrant non-governmental organizations in Beijing and Shanghai. Progress in Development Studies, 12(1), 63–76.
Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (Eds.). (2013). The Chinese corporatist state: Adaption, survival and resistance. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (2014). The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(87), 516–534.
Hsu, J. Y. J., & Hasmath, R. (forthcoming). A maturing civil society in China? The role of knowledge and professionalization in the development of NGOs. China Information.
Hsu, J. Y. J., Hildebrandt, T., & Hasmath, R. (2016). Going out or staying in? The expansion of Chinese NGOs in Africa. Development Policy Review, 34(3), 423–439.
Institute, Brookings. (2015). Global metro monitor: An uncertain recovery. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
Jacobs, A., & Buckley, C. (2015). China, civic groups’ freedom, and followers, are vanishing. New York Times.
Lieberthal, K. (1995). Governing China: From revolution through reform. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Lu, Y. (2009). Non-governmental organizations in China: The rise of dependent autonomy. New York: Routledge.
Ministry of Civil Affairs (MoCA). (2013). 2013 Statistical report of social service development (Shehui Fuwu Fashan Tongji Baogao). Beijing: Ministry of Civil Affairs.
Perry, E. J. (2015). The populist dream of Chinese democracy. Journal of Asian Studies, 74(4), 903–915.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ru, J., & Ortolano, L. (2009). Development of citizen-organized environmental NGOs in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(2), 141–168.
Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 73(4), 109–122.
Shieh, S., & Brown-Inz, A. (2013). A special report: Mapping China’s public interest NGOs. In N. G. O. Chinese (Ed.), Directory (pp. vii–xxiii). Beijing: China Development Brief.
Shieh, S., & Deng, G. (2011). An emerging civil society: The impact of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake on grassroots associations in China. The China Journal, 65, 181–194.
Simon, K. W. (2013). Civil society in China: The legal framework from ancient times to the ‘new reform era’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, J. H. (2009). The art of doing good: Charity in late Ming China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Spires, A. J., Tao, L., & Chan, K. (2014). Societal support for China’s grassroots NGOs: Evidence from Yunnan, Guangdong, and Beijing. The China Journal, 71, 65–90.
Stryker, R. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179–223.
Tam, J., & Hasmath, R. (2015). Navigating uncertainty: The survival strategies of religious NGOs in China. Journal of Civil Society, 11(3), 283–299.
Teets, J. C. (2009). Post-earthquake relief and reconstruction efforts: The emergence of civil society in China? The China Quarterly, 198, 330–347.
Teets, J. C. (2015). The evolution of civil society in Yunnan province: Contending models of civil society management in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 158–175.
Tsou, T. (1994). Twentieth century Chinese politics: Viewed from the perspective of macro history and micro actions. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
White, G. (1993). Prospects for civil society in China: A case study of Xiaoshan City. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 29, 63–87.
White, G., Howell, J., & Shang, X. (1996). In Search of civil society: Market reform and social change in contemporary China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Whiting, S. H. (1991). The politics of NGO development in China. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2(2), 16–48.
Wu, F. (2013). Environmental activism in provincial China. Journal of Environmental Policy Planning, 15, 89–109.
Wubbeke, J. (2014). A three-year battle for China’s new environmental law. China Dialogue, April 25.
Xie, L. (2009). Environmental activism in China. New York: Routledge.
Yang, K. M., & Alpermann, B. (2014). Children and youth NGOs in China: Social activism between embeddedness and marginalization. China Information, 28(3), 311–337.
Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211–236.
Yu, K. (2003). The emerging of China’s civil society and its significance to governance. Essen: Asia Foundation.
Zhang, J. Y., & Barr, M. (2013). Green politics in China. London: Pluto Press.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2012-0066).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, J.Y.J., Hsu, C.L. & Hasmath, R. NGO Strategies in an Authoritarian Context, and Their Implications for Citizenship: The Case of the People’s Republic of China. Voluntas 28, 1157–1179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9806-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9806-0