Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Charlson’s comorbidity index on overall survival following tumor nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study the impact of Charlson’s comorbidity index on overall survival following radical and partial nephrectomy performed for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

Patients with primary RCC treated by tumor nephrectomy with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The outcome parameters assessed were overall survival, impact of surgery on quality of life of patients using Karnofsky’s index and correlation of survival with respect to comorbid conditions, using Charlson’s index comorbidity score, grade and stage of disease.

Results

A total of 214 tumor nephrectomies were performed during study period, of which 157 (73%) fulfilling the criteria were included in the final analysis. The mean age at presentation was 57 ± 12 years. The mean Charlson’s index was 2.89 ± 2.22. Tumor stages were I–IV in 33, 30, 16 and 21%, respectively. The overall survival was 65% at a mean follow-up of 39 ± 5 months. The mean pre op Karnofsky’s index was 79.5 ± 7.13 and at follow-up it was 95.41 ± 10.65 (P < .001). The difference in functional status of patient (Karnofsky’s Index) for every stage including Stage-IV was statistically significant (P 0.01). Survival analysis showed a significant differences in overall survival according to stage (P 0.001), grade (P 0.001), size of tumor (P 0.001) and Charlson’s index (P = 0.05).

Conclusions

There was significant improvement in the quality of life, following tumor nephrectomy, even for Stage-IV cancers. Multivariate analysis indicated besides tumor stage, grade, and size of the tumor, Charlson’s index has a significant predictive value on overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58(2):71–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aron M, Nguyen MM, Stein RJ, Gill IS (2008) Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database. Eur Urol 54(1):133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK (2007) Five-year survival after surgical treatment for kidney cancer: a population-based competing risk analysis. Cancer 109(9):1763–1768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger DA, Megwalu II, Vlahiotis A, Radwan MH, Serrano MF, Humphrey PA, Piccirillo JF, Kibel AS (2008) Impact of comorbidity on overall survival in patients surgically treated for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 72(2):359–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano MF, Humphrey PA, Piccirillo JF, Kibel AS (2003) TNM atlas-UICC. Guide illustre´ de la classification TNM/pTNM des tumeurs malignes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeod CM (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Columbia Univ Press, New York, p 196

    Google Scholar 

  8. Woldrich JM, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Carroll PR, Kane CJ (2008) Sex differences in renal cell cancer presentation and survival: an analysis of the national cancer database, 1993–2004. J Urol 179(5):1709–1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donat SM, Salzhauer EW, Mitra N, Yanke BV, Snyder ME, Russo P (2006) Impact of body mass index on survival of patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 175(1):46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamat AM, Shock RP, Naya Y, Rosser CJ, Slaton JW, Pisters LL (2004) Prognostic value of body mass index in patients undergoing nephrectomy for localized renal tumors. Urology 63(1):46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koppie TM, Serio AM, Vickers AJ, Vora K, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Herr HW, Bochner BH (2008) Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 112(11):2384–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Santos Arrontes D, Fernández Aceñero MJ, García González JI, Martín Muñoz M, Paniagua Andrés P (2008) Survival analysis of clear cell renal carcinoma according to the Charlson comorbidity index. J Urol 179(3):857–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gettman MT, Boelter CW, Cheville JC, Zincke H, Bryant SC, Blute ML (2003) Charlson co-morbidity index as a predictor of outcome after surgery for renal cell carcinoma with renal vein, vena cava or right atrium extension. J Urol 169(4):1282–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hammad Ather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ather, M.H., Nazim, S.M. Impact of Charlson’s comorbidity index on overall survival following tumor nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 42, 299–303 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9636-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9636-8

Keywords

Navigation