Skip to main content
Log in

Williamson’s Woes

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a reply to Timothy Williamson’s paper ‘Tennant’s Troubles’. It defends against Williamson’s objections the anti-realist’s knowability principle based on the author’s ‘local’ restriction strategy involving Cartesian propositions, set out in The Taming of the True. Williamson’s purported Fitchian reductio, involving the unknown number of books on his table, is analyzed in detail and shown to be fallacious. Williamson’s attempt to cause problems for the anti-realist by means of a supposed rigid designator generates a contradiction with arithmetic right away, upon instantiating the obviously relevant theorem that every natural number is provably odd or provably even. The paper also explains and formulates a globally restricted knowability principle, which likewise blocks the attempted reductio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airy G. B. (1846) Account of some circumstances historically connected with the discovery of the planet exterior to Uranus. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society VII(9): 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S. (1980) Naming and necessity (revised and enlarged edition). Basil Blackwell Publisher, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant N. (1997) The Taming of the True. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant N. (2001a) Is every truth knowable? Reply to Hand and Kvanvig. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(1): 107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant N. (2001b) Is every truth knowable? Reply to Williamson. Ratio 14(3): 263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant N. (2006) Logic, mathematics, and the natural sciences. In: Jacquette D. (eds) Philosophy of logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1149–1166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant N. (2009) Revamping the restriction strategy. In: Salerno J. (eds) Every truth is known: New essays on knowability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2000) Tennant on knowable truth. Ratio 13(2): 99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (2009) Tennant’s Troubles. In: Salerno J. (eds) Every truth is known: New essays on knowability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 183–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Tennant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tennant, N. Williamson’s Woes. Synthese 173, 9–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9673-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9673-y

Keywords

Navigation