Abstract
We analyze the Wolf number daily series WN (1849 to present) as well as two other related series characterizing solar activity. Our analysis consists in computing the amplitude of a given Fourier component in a sliding time window and examining its long-term evolution. We start with the well-known 27.03- and 27.6-day periods and observe strong decadal variations of this amplitude as well as a sharp increase of the average value starting around 1905. We then consider a packet of 31 lines with periods from 25.743 to 28.453 days, which is shown to be a better representation of the synodic solar rotation. We first examine the temporal evolution of individual lines, then the energy of the packet. The energy of the packet increases sharply at the beginning of the 20th century, leading by more than two decades the well-known increase of the Wolf number. The nonaxisymmetry of sunspots increases before the total increase of activity and may be considered as a precursor. We discuss briefly and tentatively this observation in terms of solar dynamo theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanter, E., Le Mouël, J.L., Perrier, F., Shnirman, M.: 2006, Solar Phys. 237, 329.
Chulliat, A., Blanter, E., Le Mouël, J.L., Shnirman, M.: 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A05301.
Cowling, T.G.: 1933, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 94, 39.
de Toma, G., White, O.R., Harvey, K.L.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 529, 1101.
Dorch, S.B.F., Nordlund, A.: 2001, Astron. Astrophys. 365, 562.
Gilman, P.A.: 1986, In: Sturrock, P.A. (ed.) The Solar Interior I, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998, Solar Phys. 181, 491.
Kane, R.P.: 2002, Solar Phys. 209, 207.
Krause, H., Rädler, K.H.: 1980, Mean Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory, Pergamon, Oxford.
Le Mouël, J.L., Blanter, E., Chulliat, A., Shnirman, M.G.: 2004, Ann. Geophys. 22, 985.
Mordvinov, A.V., Plyusnina, L.A.: 2000, Solar Phys. 197, 1.
Mursala, K., Hiltula, T.: 2004, Solar Phys. 224, 133.
Neugebauer, M., Smith, E.J., Ruzmaikin, A., Feyman, J., Vaughan, A.H.: 2000, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 2315.
Ossendrijver, M.: 2003, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 11, 287.
Parker, E.N.: 1979, Cosmical Magnetic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SIDC team: 1850 – 2005, Monthly Report on the International Sunspot Number, http://www.sidc.be/sunspot-data/.
Solanki, S.K.: 2003, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 11, 153.
Temmer, M., Veronig, A., Hanslmeier, A.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 390, 707.
Thompson, M.J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Miesch, M.S., Toomre, J.: 2003, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 41, 599.
Tobias, S.M., Brummel, N.H., Clune, T.L., Toomre, J.: 1998, Astrophys. J. 502, 177.
Tobias, S.M., Hugues, D.W.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 603, 785.
Tobias, S.M., Weiss, N.O.: 2007, In: Hughes, D.W., Rosner, R., Weiss, N.O. (eds.) The Solar Tachocline, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le Mouël, JL., Shnirman, M.G. & Blanter, E.M. The 27-Day Signal in Sunspot Number Series and the Solar Dynamo. Sol Phys 246, 295–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9065-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9065-8