Abstract
Environmental equality, social justice and well-being are national headline indicators for the United Kingdom (UK), and community vibrancy is a rural headline indicator. All four of these indicators were designated as headline indicators prior to any robust definition or methodology for their measurement was articulated. Prior to the establishment of social justice and environmental equality as headline indicators, research commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs indicated that, at least in the foreseeable future, it would not be possible to operationalise these concepts as indicators of sustainable development. Research into well-being and community vibrancy also illustrated significant problems with their measurement, but in terms of these two indicators that research was carried out after their establishment as headline indicators. These findings illustrate problems with dialogue between the government and relevant experts: difficult to measure concepts have been erroneously designated as headline indicators for the UK.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Who really cares about sustainability indicators? Local Environment, 6, 291–309.
Countryside Agency. (1999). Agenda for the 5th meeting of the CA. Retrieved from http://www.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/archive/board_meetings/agendas/5th_agenda.asp
Countryside Agency. (2000). Agenda for the 13th meeting of the CA. Retrieved from http://www.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/archive/board_meetings/agendas/13th_agenda.asp
Countryside Agency. (2003). The state of the countryside. Retrieved from http://www.countryside.gov.uk/Publications/articles/Publication_tcm2-4322.asp?bMultiplePDFs=true
Countryside Agency. (2004). The state of the countryside. Retrieved from http://www.countryside.gov.uk/Publications/articles/Publication_tcm2-19379.asp?bMultiplePDFs=true
Commission for Rural Communities. (2005). The state of the countryside. Retrieved from http://www.ruralcommunities.gov.uk/files/CRC05-StateoftheCountryside2005-fullreport.pdf
Commission for Rural Communities. (2006). The state of the countryside. Retrieved from http://www.ruralcommunities.gov.uk/files/SoTC06_Complete.pdf
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2004a). Review of the Rural White Paper. Retrieved from: http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/pdfs/rwpreview/rwp_review.pdf
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2004b). Taking it on. Developing UK Sustainable Development Strategy together. Consultation. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/pdf/consult.pdf
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2005). Securing the future: Delivering UK Sustainable Development Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/uk-strategy/index.htm
Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999a). A better quality of life—sustainable development for the United Kingdom. Retrieved from: http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/uk-strategy99/index.htm
Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999b). Quality of Life Counts. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/progress/indicators/qolc99.htm
Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999c). Rural England: A discussion document.
Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Our countryside: The future—a fair deal for rural England. Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/pdfs/ruralwp/rural.pdf
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., Dixon, A., Knight, M., Phillips, D., Tsuchiya, A., & White, M. (2006a). Research on the relationship between well-being and sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/pdf/WellbeingProject3A.pdf
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2006b). Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policy making. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/pdf/WellbeingProject2.pdf
Eady, V. (2003). Environmental justice in state policy decisions. In J. Agyeman, R. Bullard, & B. Evans (Eds.), Just sustainabilities in an unequal world (pp. 168–181). Earthscan: London.
Faber, D. R., & Krieg, E. J. (2002). Unequal exposure to ecological hazards: Environmental injustices in the commonwealth of Massachusetts. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(Suppl. 2), 277–288.
Giles, J. (2006). UK civil servants accused of warping science. Nature, 444, 252–253.
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988) Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxviii). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krieg, E. J. (1998). Methodological considerations in the study of toxic waste hazards. Social Science Journal, 35, 191–202.
Krieg, E. J., & Faber, D. R. (2004). Not so black and white: Environmental justice and cumulative impact assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 667–694.
Lucas, K., Walker, G., Eames, M., Fay, H., & Poustie M. (2004). Environment and social justice: Rapid research and evidence review. Retrieved from http://www.psi.org.uk/sdrn/SDRN%20environment%20and%20social%20justice%20report%20-%20revised.pdf
Lowe, P., & Ward, N. (2001). New Labour, new rural vision? Labour’s rural white paper. Political Quarterly, 72, 386–390.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicator building. Retrieved from http://farmweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ci/Document/EUR%2021682%20EN.pdf
Reed, M., Fraser, E. D. G., Morse, S., & Dougill, A. J. (2005). Integrating methods for developing sustainability indicators to facilitate learning and action. Ecology and Society, 10, r3.
Woods, M. (2006). Rural politics and governance. In J. Midgley (Ed.), A new rural agenda (pp. 140–168). Institute for Public Policy Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stapleton, L.M., Garrod, G.D. Policy Preceding Possibility? Examining Headline Composite Sustainability Indicators in the United Kingdom. Soc Indic Res 87, 495–502 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9159-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9159-6