Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Making the Personal Political: Personal versus Group-Focused Rumination Following Sexual Harassment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of social media consciousness-raising campaigns, such as #MeToo and #TimesUp that encourage individuals to share their experiences of harassment and hold perpetrators accountable, might, in part, serve to promote a group-focused way of thinking about unwelcomed events that may be adaptive. In the current research, we propose a distinction between two forms of rumination, personal rumination on how that experience personally affected oneself, and group-focused rumination on how the experience is shared by many other members of one’s group, and how it impacts them. We apply this distinction to the sexual harassment of women and test the hypothesis that these two forms of post-event rumination predict markedly different psychological consequences. Consistent with a proposed dual rumination model of sexual harassment, we found that personal rumination uniquely mediated an association between sexual harassment and depression through increased brooding about oneself, in an undergraduate (N = 306) and community (N = 203) sample of women. In contrast, group rumination uniquely mediated an association between sexual harassment and gender critical consciousness (systemic injustice awareness and collective action engagement). This pattern suggests that ruminations prompted by a sexual harassment experience are not invariably maladaptive. Repetitive thoughts targeting group-focused construals of a personal, social injustice experience may be both politically adaptive and psychologically beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data are available from the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Funding

The current research was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Insight Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Sinclair.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The research was approved by our university’s Human Research Ethics Board

Informed Consent

All participants gave informed consent before participation in the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinclair, L., Trapnell, P. & Kinsman, L. Making the Personal Political: Personal versus Group-Focused Rumination Following Sexual Harassment. Sex Roles 89, 517–538 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01407-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01407-4

Keywords

Navigation