Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship of Physiological Arousal with Demand and Withdraw Behavior: Examining the Accuracy of the Escape-Conditioning Hypothesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The escape-conditioning model suggests that husbands experience greater physiological arousal during marital conflict than their wives. This greater arousal is hypothesized to lead to withdrawal from conflict in order to lessen the arousal. The present results, based on a U.S. sample of 64 heterosexual couples, found no support for this model. During problem-solving discussions, husbands did not exhibit greater skin conductance and did not report greater arousal than their wives. Furthermore, skin conductance was negatively linked to withdraw behavior. These results, while not consistent with the escape-conditioning model, are in line with recent studies that have explicitly examined gender differences in other types of physiological arousal during marital conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, P. C., & Smith, T. W. (1992). Social influence, marriage and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives. Health Psychology, 11, 88–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as a predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In P. Noller, & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). Cambridge: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., & Argas, W. S. (1991). High blood pressure and marital discord: Not being nasty matters more than being nice. Health Psychology, 10, 155–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, B. E., & Walker, J. S. (2000). Sex differences in pain and analgesia. Pain Reviews, 7, 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151–160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1988). The social psychophysiology of marriage. In P. Noller & M. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 182–200). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harver, A., Katkin, E. S., & Bloch, E. (1993). Signal-detection outcomes on heartbeat and respiratory resistance detection tasks in male and female subjects. Psychophysiology, 30, 223–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C. L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 797–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., Bates, L., & Vogel, D. L. (1993). Withdraw-demand communication behaviors: Comparing two observational coding systems. Annual meeting of AABT, Washington, DC.

  • Julien, D., Arellano, C., & Turgeon, L. (1997). Gender issues in heterosexual, gay and lesbian couples. In W. K. Halford & H. Markman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of marriage and couples interventions (pp. 107–127). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451–477). NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Newton, T. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J., MacCallum, R., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. (1996). Marital conflict and endocrine function: Are men really more physiologically affected than women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 324–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koltyn, K. F., O’Connor, P. J., & Morgan, W. P. (1991). Perception of effort in female and male competitive swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12, 427–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klinetob, N. A., & Smith, D. A. (1995). Demand-withdraw communication in marital interaction: Tests of interspousal contingency and gender role hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 945–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., & Van De Vliert, E. (2000). The division of labor in close relationships: An asymmetrical conflict issue. Personal Relationships, 7, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., McBurnett, K., Loeber, R., & Hart, E. L. (1995). Psychobiology. In P. G. Sholevar (Ed.), Conduct disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 27–44). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 56–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., & Ekman, P. (2002). Difficulty does not account for emotion-specific heart rate changes in the directed facial action task. Psychobiology, 39, 397–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 85–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malarkey, W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Pearl, D., & Glaser, R. (1994). Hostile behavior during marital conflict alters pituitary and adrenal hormones. Psychosomatic Medicine, 56, 41–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). Demand.Withdraw patterns in serial argements: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32, 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morell, M. A., & Apple, R. F. (1990). Affect expression, marital satisfaction, and stress reactivity among premenopausal women during a conflictual marital discussion. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, T., & Sanford, J. (2003). Conflict structure moderates associations between cardiovascular reactivity and negative marital interaction. Health Psychology, 22, 270–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Notarius, C. I., & Johnson, J. S. (1982). Emotional expression in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 483–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., & Roberts, T. A. (1992). Towards a his and hers theory of emotion: Gender differences in visceral perception. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1998). Theoretical approaches to understanding sex differences and similarities in conflict behavior. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 287-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., De Clercq, A., & Goodwin, R. (2005). Emotional arousal and negative affect in marital conflict: The influence of gender, conflict structure, and demand-withdrawal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. L., Murphy, M. J., Werner-Wilson, R. J., Cutrona, C. E., & Seeman, J. C. (2007). Sex differences in the use of demand and withdraw behavior in marriage: Examining the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Vogel.

Additional information

This research was supported by a research grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH068289).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogel, D.L., Werner-Wilson, R.J., Liang, K. et al. The Relationship of Physiological Arousal with Demand and Withdraw Behavior: Examining the Accuracy of the Escape-Conditioning Hypothesis. Sex Roles 59, 871–879 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9490-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9490-7

Keywords

Navigation