Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a citation-based mapping exercise in the nanosciences field and a first sketch of citation transactions (a measure of cognitive dependences). Nanosciences are considered to be one of the “convergent” components shaping the future of science and technology. Recurrent questions about the structure of the field concern its diversity and multi- or inter-disciplinarity. Observations made from various points of view confirm a strong differentiation of the field, which is scattered in multiple galaxies with moderate level of exchanges. The multi-disciplinarity of themes and super-themes detected by mapping also appears moderate, most of the super-themes being based on physics and chemistry in various proportions. Structural analysis of the list of references in articles suggests that the moderate multi-disciplinarity observed at the aggregate level partly stems from an actual inter-disciplinarity at the article level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, G. (1998), Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologieanalyse, Bericht desVDI Technologiezentrum, Abteilung Zukünftige Technologie des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI).

  • Benzecri, J.-P. (Coll.) (1981), Pratique de l’analyse des données: Linguistique et lexicologie, Dunod, Paris.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., Thoma, G. (2005), Scientific and Technological Regimes in Nanotechnology: Combinatorial Inventors and Performance, LEM Papers Series, 2005-13.

  • Braun, T., Schubert, A., Zsindely, S. (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38(2): 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (2004), Normative shaping of scientific practice: The magic of Merton, Scientometrics, 60(1): 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, M. R., Zucker, L. G. (2003), Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology, NBER, 9825.

  • Domenges, D., Volle, M. (1979), Analyse factorielle sphérique: une exploration, Annales de l’INSEE, 35 (Juillet–Septembre): 3–84.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Escofier, B. (1978), Analyses factorielles et distances répondant au principe d’équivalence. distributionnelle, Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 26(4): 29–37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fogelberg, H. (2003), The grand politics of technoscience: Contextualizing nanotechnology, In: H. Fogelberg, H. Glimell (Eds), Bringing Visibility To the Invisible Towards A Social Understanding of Nanotechnology, Goeteborg University STS Research Reports 6, pp. 29–47.

  • Franks, A. (1987), Nanotechnology, Journal of Physics E: Scientific instruments, 20: 1442–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, D., Blume, M., Byrnes, J., Chow, J. E., Kapadia, S., Rohwer, R., Wang, Z. (2005), New experiments in distributional representations of synonymy, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), Ann Arbor, June 2005.

  • Garfield, E. (1967), Primordial concepts, citation indexing and historio-bibliography, Journal Library History, 2: 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Czerwon, H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37(2): 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Meyer, M., Du Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., Schlemmer, B., Debackere, K., Veugelers, R. (2003), Nanotechnology. Analysis of an Emerging Domain of Scientific and Technological Endeavour, Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, K.U. Leuven, Steunpuntoos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, T. (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of Publications and Patent Applications including Comparisons with the United States, Nanotechnology, Law & Business, 1(4): 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, T., Kuhlmann, S. (2006), Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology, In: D. Jansen (Ed.), New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations. From Disciplinary Theories towards Interfaces and Integration, Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, B., Theoret, C., Mogoutov, A., Larédo, P. (2006) Dynamics of “Nano” Science: A Remake of the IT or Bio “Waves”? Prime, NanoDistrict Workshop, March 2006, Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14: 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., Lau, C. G. Y., Tolles, W. M. (2006), The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4): 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2002), Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation, 4th Triple Helix Conference, Copenhagen.

  • Legendre, P., Gallagher, E. D. (2001), Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data, Oecologia, 129(2): 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelu, A. (1994), Clusters and factors: neural algorithms for a novel representation of huge and highly multidimensional data sets, In: E. Diday, Y. Lechevallier (Eds), New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelu, A. (2003), Evaluation of three measures of similarity used in information science, Information Sciences for Decision Making 6: 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1996), Proposal for the Use of the Input-Output Approach in the Analysis of the Structure of Interdisciplinary Relationships, Economic Systems Research, 8(1): 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. (2007), Is the United States Losing Ground in Science? A Global Perspective on the World Science System in 2005, in preparation.

  • Malsch, I. (1997), Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Subareas, European Commission — JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, EUR 17710EN.

  • Marcotorchino, J.-F. (1986), Maximal associations as a tool for classification, North Holland, In: W. Gaul, M. Schader (Eds), Classification as a Tool for Research, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshakova, I. V. (1973), Document coupling system based on references taken from Science Citation Index (in Russian), Nauchno-Teknicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2(6): 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusita, K. (1955), Decision rules based on distance, for problems of fit, two samples and applications, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26: 631–640.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Persson, O. (1998), Nanotechnology — Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 42(2): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Persson, O., Power, Y. (2001), Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data.Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies, EC, DG-Research, Preparatory study.

  • Meyer, M. (2007), What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency, Scientometrics, 70(3): 779–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, F., Bordons, M., Gomez, I. (2001), An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 51(1): 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C., Buter, R. K., Hinze, S., Van, Raan, A. F. J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Rangnow, R. (2003), Mapping Excellence in Science and Technology across Europe: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, EC, EC-PPN CT 2002-0001.

  • Porter, A., Youtie, Y., Shapira, P. (2006), Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology, working paper NSF/CNS-ASU.

  • Roco, M. C., Bainbridge, W. S. (2002) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, NSF.

  • Schmid, G., Decker, M., Ernst, H., Fuchs, H., Gruenwald, W., Grunwald, A., Hofmann, H., Mayor, M., Rathgeber, W., Simon, U., Wyrna, D. (2003), Small dimensions and material properties. A definition of nanotechnology, Europaeische Akademie, Graue Reihe, 35: 1–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2004), Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59(3): 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4): 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomov, D. T., Mutafov, H. G. (1996), Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science, Scientometrics, 37(2): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T., Tijssen, R. (2000), Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows, Research Evaluation, 9(3): 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. (1994), Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis, Scientometrics, 30(1): 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E. (2003), Bridging citation and reference distributions: Part I — The referencing-structure function and its application to co-citation and co-item studies, Scientometrics, 57(1): 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M. (2005), Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators — comments on A. Van Raan’s focus article, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(1): 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. (2006), Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences, Information Processing & Management, 42(6): 1513–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lereco, INRA, BP 71627, F-44316, Nantes cedex 3, France

    Elise Bassecoulard & Michel Zitt

  2. INRA, Crebi, Jouy-en-Josas, France

    Alain Lelu

  3. LASELDI, Universié de Franche-Comté, LASELDI, Besançon, France

    Alain Lelu

  4. Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST), Paris, France

    Michel Zitt

Authors
  1. Elise Bassecoulard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alain Lelu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Zitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise Bassecoulard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A. & Zitt, M. Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics 70, 859–880 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0315-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0315-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation