Abstract
Although some creationist objections to evolutionary biology are simplistic and thus are easily refuted, when more technical arguments become widespread it is important for science educators to explain the relevant science in a straightforward manner. An interesting case study is provided by misguided allegations about how cytochrome c data pertain to molecular evolution. The most common of these misrepresentations bears a striking similarity to a particularly glaring misunderstanding of what should be expected of a transitional form in a fossil sequence. Although evangelist Kirk Cameron’s ridiculous injunction of a hypothetical ‘crocoduck’ as an example of a potential transitional form is frequently invoked to illustrate the ignorance of many critics of evolutionary science, a strikingly analogous argument was applied to cytochrome c data by biochemist Michael Denton in 1985. The details of this analogy are worth exploring to clarify the fallacy of the widely circulated molecular argument.
Notes
References
Ayala, F. (2011). Walter Monroe Fitch 1929–2011 a biographical memoir. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Baum, D. A., & Offner, S. (2008). Phylogenies and tree-thinking. The American Biology Teacher, 70(4), 222–229.
Baum, D. A., & Smith, S. (2013). Tree thinking: An introduction to phylogenetic biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company Publishers.
Brauer, M. J., & Brumbaugh, D. R. (2001). Biology remystified: The scientific claims of the new creationists. In R. T. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics (pp. 289–334). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Cameron, K. (2007). Rational response debate with Kirk Cameron pt.6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6EmOQLf25s. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Catley, K. M. (2006). Darwin’s missing link—A novel paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90(5), 767–783.
Catley, K. M., Novick, L. R., & Shade, C. K. (2010). Interpreting evolutionary diagrams: When topology and process conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 861–882.
Chiappe, L. M. (2009). Downsized dinosaurs: The evolutionary transition to modern birds. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 248–256.
Clarke, J. A., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, F. (2006). Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of Yixianornis grabaui. Journal of Anatomy, 208, 287–308.
Crick, F. H. C. (1958). On protein synthesis. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 12, 138–163.
Crisp, M. D., & Cook, L. G. (2005). Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(3), 122–128.
Dao, C. (2009). New ICR Research Associate: Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D. Acts & Facts, 38(9), 9.
Davis, P., & Kenyon, D. H. (1993). Of pandas and people: The central question of biological origins (2nd ed.). Dallas: Haughton Publishing Company.
Dayhoff, M. O. (1969a). Computer analysis of protein evolution. Scientific American, 221(1), 87–95.
Dayhoff, M. O. (Ed.). (1969b). Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1969 volume 4. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O. (Ed.). (1972). Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1972 volume 5. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O. (Ed.). (1978). Atlas of protein sequence and structure volume 5 supplement 3 1978. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O., & Eck, R. V. (1968a). Evolution of the cytochrome C family. In M. O. Dayhoff & R. V. Eck (Eds.), Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1967–68 (pp. 7–13). Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O., & Eck, R. V. (Eds.). (1968b). Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1967–8. Silver Spring MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O., Eck, R. V., Chang, M. A., & Sochard, M. R. (1965). Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O., & Park, C. M. (1969). Cytochrome C: Building a phylogenetic tree. In M. O. Dayhoff (Ed.), Atlas of protein sequence and structure volume 4 1969 (pp. 7–16). Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Dayhoff, M. O., Schwartz, R. M., & Orcutt, B. C. (1978). A model of evolutionary change in proteins. In M. O. Dayhoff (Ed.), Atlas of protein sequence and structure volume 5 supplement 3 1978 (pp. 345–352). Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
de Queiroz, A. (2014). The monkey’s voyage: How improbable journeys shaped the history of life. New York: Basic Books.
Dembski, W., & Wells, J. (2008). The design of life: Discovering signs of intelligence in biological systems. Dallas: Foundation for Thought and Ethics.
Denton, M. J. (1985). Evolution: A theory in crisis. Great Britain: Burnett Books.
Denton, M. J. (1998). Nature’s destiny: How the laws of biology reveal purpose in the universe. New York: Free Press.
Denton, M. J. (1999). Comments on special creationism. In P. E. Johnson & D. O. Lamoureux (Eds.), Darwinism defeated? The Johnson-Lamoureux debate on biological origins (pp. 141–154). Vancouver: Regent College Publishing.
Dickerson, R. E. (1971). The structure of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 1, 26–45.
Dickerson, R. E. (1972). The structure and history of an ancient protein. Scientific American, 226, 58–70.
Dickerson, R. E. (1980). The cytochromes c: An exercise in scientific serendipity. In D. S. Sigman & M. A. B. Bazier (Eds.), The evolution of protein structure and function (pp. 173–202). New York: Academic Press.
Dickerson, R. E., & Geis, I. (1969). The structure and action of proteins. New York: Harper & Row.
Dietrich, M. R. (1998). Paradox and persuasion: Negotiating the place of molecular evolution within evolutionary biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 31, 85–111.
Eck, R. V., & Dayhoff, M. O. (Eds.). (1966). Atlas of protein sequence and structure 1966. Silver Spring MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
Eldredge, N. (1986). Review of evolution: A theory in crisis by Michael Denton. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 61(4), 541–542.
Fitch, W. M., & Margoliash, E. (1967). Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279–284.
Forrest, B., & Gross, P. R. (2007). Creationism’s Trojan horse: The wedge of intelligent design (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford.
Gaither, M. (2009). Homeschooling in the USA: Past, present and future. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 331–346.
Garner, J. P., Taylor, G. K., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1999). On the origin of birds: The sequence of character acquisition in the evolution of avian flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 1259–1266.
Gish, D. (1993). Creation scientists answer their critics. El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research.
Godfrey, L. R. (Ed.). (1983). Scientists confront creationism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Graur, D., & Martin, W. (2004). Reading the entrails of chickens: Molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. Trends in Genetics, 20(2), 80–86.
Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 121–137.
Hagen, J. (1999). Naturalists, molecular biologists, and the challenges of molecular evolution. Journal of the History of Biology, 32, 321–341.
Hagen, J. (2011). The origin and early reception of sequence databases. In M. Hamacher, M. Eisenacher, & C. Stephan (Eds.), Data mining in proteomics: From standards to applications (pp. 61–78). New York: Springer.
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Homchick, J. A. (2012). March of the pandas: Imitation and intelligent design. Poroi 8(1), 5. 10.13008/2151-2957.1109. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Jeanson, N. (2009). Nathaniel Jeanson, Harvard PhD—Cytochrome C sequence conservation bankrupts evolution! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCVE5BwBrUk. Accessed October 26, 2013.
Jeanson, N. (2011). Molecular equidistance: The echo of discontinuity? Acts & Facts, 40(2), 6.
Johnson, P. E. (1993). Darwin on trial (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Jukes, T. (1983). Molecular evidence for evolution. In L. R. Godfrey (Ed.), Scientists confront creationism (pp. 117–138). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217, 624–626.
Kitzmiller Trial Transcripts. (2005). http://ncse.com/creationism/legal/kitzmiller-trial-transcripts. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Kjaergaard, P. C. (2011). ‘Hurrah for the missing link!’: A history of apes, ancestors and a crucial piece of evidence. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 65, 83–98.
Kofahl, R. E., & Segraves, K. (1975). The creation explanation: A scientific alternative to evolution. Wheaton: Harold Shaw Publishers.
Kofahl, R. E. & Segraves, K. (2003). The creation explanation. http://www.parentcompany.com/creation_explanation/cx.htm. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Landau, M. (1989). Protein sequences and Denton’s error. Creation/Evolution Journal, 9, 1–7.
Lanfear, R., Welch, J. J., & Bromham, L. (2010). Watching the clock: Studying variation in rates of molecular evolution between species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(9), 495–503.
Louchart, A., & Viriot, L. (2011). From snout to beak: The loss of teeth in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(12), 663–673.
Lynch, M. (2010). Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends in Genetics, 26(8), 345–352.
Margoliash, E. (1963). Primary structure and evolution of cytochrome c. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 50, 672–679.
Margoliash, E., & Fitch, W. (1968). Evolutionary variability of cytochrome c primary structures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 151, 359–381.
Margoliash, E., & Smith, E. L. (1965). Structural and functional aspects of cytochrome c in relation to evolution. In V. Bryson & H. J. Vogel (Eds.), Evolving genes and proteins (pp. 221–242). New York: Academic Press.
Margoliash, E., Smith, E. L., Kreil, G., & Tuppy, H. (1961). Amino-acid sequence of horse heart cytochrome c: The complete amino-acid sequence. Nature, 192, 1125–1127.
McLaughlin, P. J., & Dayhoff, M. O. (1973). Eukaryote evolution: A view based on cytochrome c sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2, 99–116.
Mead, L. (2009). Transforming our thinking about transitional forms. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 310–314.
Meisel, R. P. (2010). Teaching tree-thinking to undergraduate biology students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 621–628.
Miller, K. (1999). Of pandas and people: A brief critique. http://www.kcfs.org/pandas.html. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Morgan, G. (1998). Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the molecular evolutionary clock, 1959–1965. Journal of the History of Biology, 31, 155–178.
Morris, H. M. (1984). History of modern creationism. San Diego: Master Book Publishers.
Müller, J., & Reisz, R. (2005). Four well-constructed calibration points from the vertebrate fossil record for molecular clock estimates. BioEssays, 27(10), 1069–1075.
Nesbitt, S. J. (2011). The early evolution of archosaurs: Relationships and the origin of major clades. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 352, 1–292.
Nesbitt, S. J., Liu, J., & Li, C. (2010). A sail-backed suchian from the Heshanggou Formation (early Triassic: Olenekian) of China. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 101, 271–284.
Novick, L., Catley, K., & Funk, D. (2010). Characters as key: The effect of synapomorphies on cladogram comprehension. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 539–547.
Novick, L., Shade, C., & Catley, K. (2011). Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: Implications for diagram design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 536–559.
Padian, K. (2001). Cross-testing adaptive hypotheses: Phylogenetic analysis and the origin of bird flight. American Zoologist, 41(3), 598–607.
Padian, K. (2008). Trickle-down evolution: An approach to getting major evolutionary adaptive changes into textbooks and curricula. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48(2), 175–188.
Padian, K., & Angielczyk, K. D. (1999). Are there transitional forms in the fossil record? In P. H. Kelley, J. R. Bryan, & T. A. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution–creation controversy II: Perspectives on science, religion, and geological education (pp. 47–82). Pittsburgh: The Paleontological Society.
Padian, K., & Angielczyk, K. D. (2007). “Transitional forms” versus transitional features. In A. J. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (Eds.), Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism (pp. 197–230). New York: Norton.
Padian, K., & Matzke, N. (2009). Darwin, Dover, ‘intelligent design’ and textbooks. Biochemical Journal, 417, 29–42.
Prothero, D. R. (2007). Evolution: What the fossils say and why it matters. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pulquério, M. J. F., & Nichols, R. A. (2006). Dates from the molecular clock: How wrong can we be? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(4), 180–184.
Rennie, J. (2002). 15 Answers to creationist nonsense. Scientific American, 287, 78–85.
Ridley, M. (1985). More Darwinian detractors. Nature, 318, 124–125.
Sarfati, J. (2002). Refuting evolution 2. Green Forrest, AR: Master Books.
Schwabe, C. (2000). Molecular geneology. In: Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6435/. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Schwabe, C. (2001). The genomic potential hypothesis: A chemist’s view of the origins, evolution and unfolding of life. Georgetown, TX: Lands Bioscience.
Scott, E. C., & Matzke, N. J. (2007). Biological design in science classrooms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8669–8676.
Smith, E. L., & Margoliash, E. (1964). Evolution of cytochrome c. Federation Proceedings, 23, 1243–1247.
Speith, P. T. (1987). Review of evolution a theory in crisis. Zygon, 22(2), 252–257.
Stafford, T. (1997). The making of a revolution. Christianity Today, 41, 1416. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1997/december8/7te016.html?paging=off. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Strasser, B. J. (2010). Collecting, comparing, and computing sequences: The making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s Atlas of protein sequence and structure, 1954–1965. Journal of the History of Biology, 43, 623–660.
The Parent Company. (2003a). http://www.parentcompany.com/about_us.asp. Accessed October 27, 2013.
The Parent Company. (2003b). The creation explanation. http://www.parentcompany.com/creation_explanation/cx.htm. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Thomas, J. A., Welch, J. J., Woolfit, M., & Bromham, L. (2006). There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(19), 7366–7371.
Toumey, C. P. (1994). God’s own scientists creationists in a secular world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Welch, J. J., & Bromham, L. (2005). Molecular dating when rates vary. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(6), 320–327.
Wile, J. L. (2005). Evolution: The enemy of truth and science. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-H4jQHvMmg. Accessed October 27, 2013.
Wile, J. L., & Durnell, M. F. (1998). Exploring creation with biology. Cincinnati: Apologia Educational Ministries.
Wile, J. L., & Durnell, M. F. (2005). Exploring creation with biology (2nd ed.). Kendallville, IN: Apologia Educational Ministries.
Xu, X., & Guo, Y. (2009). The origin and early evolution of feathers: Insights from recent paleontological and neontological data. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 47(4), 311–329.
Xu, X., Zheng, X., & You, H. (2010). Exceptional dinosaur fossils show ontogenetic development of early feathers. Nature, 464, 1338–1341.
Zhou, Z., Barrett, P. M., & Hiltons, J. (2003). An exceptionally preserved lower cretaceous ecosystem. Nature, 421, 807–814.
Zuckerkandl, E. (2006). Intelligent design and biological complexity. Gene, 385, 2–18.
Zuckerkandl, E., & Pauling, L. (1962). Molecular disease, evolution and genic heterogeneity. In M. Kasha & B. Pullman (Eds.), Horizons in biochemistry: Albert Szent-Gyorgyi dedicatory volume (pp. 189–225). New York: Academic Press.
Zuckerkandl, E., & Pauling, L. (1965a). Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 8, 357–366.
Zuckerkandl, E., & Pauling, L. (1965b). Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In V. Bryson & H. J. Vogel (Eds.), Evolving genes and proteins (pp. 97–166). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofmann, J.R. A Tale of Two Crocoducks: Creationist Misuses of Molecular Evolution. Sci & Educ 23, 2095–2117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9696-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9696-8