Abstract
Antitrust enforcement efforts in the United States and abroad have been ramped up in high-tech industries, which has rekindled older and largely unresolved debates concerning the appropriate role of antitrust enforcement in high-tech markets. This paper evaluates the likely competitive effects of Intel’s conduct through two approaches: The conventional approach focuses on traditional antitrust metrics in product markets: prices and output. The second, alternative approach involves turning to financial markets for valuable information. Under either approach, the available data do not support the theory that Intel’s behavior harmed consumers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott A., Wright J. (2009) Antitrust analysis of exclusive dealing and tying arrangements. In: Hylton K. N. (eds) Antitrust law and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK
AMD Corp., AMD Opens New 300 mm Fab 36 in Dresden, Germany, Continuing its Track Record of Flawless Manufacturing Strategy Execution, Retrieved May 15, 2010, from, http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases/Pages/Press_Release_101840.aspx.
AMD Corp., AMD Reports Second Quarter Results (July 14, 2004), Retrieved May 15, 2010, from, http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/AboutAMD/0,,51_52_1991~87558,00.html.
AMD Hit By Losses Across All Divisions. (2007). MSN MoneyCentral, Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/8609f8a0-a9b3-11dc-aa8b-0000779fd2ac.html.
Athlon 61 CPUs: In Short Supply? (2003). PC World.
Bittlingmayer G., Hazlett T. (2000) DOS Kapital: Has antitrust action against microsoft created valued in the computer industry?. The Journal of Financial Economics 55(3): 329–359
Cooper J., Froeb L., O’Brien D., Vita M. (2005) Vertical antitrust policy as a problem of inference. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23(7–8): 639–664
Easterbrook F. (1984) The limits of antitrust. Texas Law Review 63(1): 1–24
Eckbo B., Wier P. (1985) Antimerger policy under the Hart-Scott-Rodino act: a reexamination of the market power hypothesis. Journal of Law and Economics 28(1): 119–149
Edwards, C. (2002). A Weaker David to Intel’s Goliath. Business Week. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/02_42/b3804048.htm?tc.
Evans D., Nichols A., Schmalensee R. (2005) United States v. Microsoft: Did consumers win?. The Journal of Competition Law & Economics 1(3): 497–593
Klein B. (2001) The microsoft case: What can a dominant firm do to defend its market position?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2): 45–62
Klein B., Murphy K. (2008) Exclusive dealing intensifies competition for distribution. Antitrust Law Journal 75(2): 433–465
Kobayashi, B. (2005). The economics of loyalty discounts and antitrust law in the United States. Compet Policy Int 115–135.
Kovacic, W. (2009). The Federal Trade Commission at 100: Into Our 2nd Century, 159–160.
Lafontaine, F., & Slade, M. (2008). Empirical Assessment of Exclusive Contracts. In P. Buccirossi (Ed.), Handbook of Antitrust Economics.
Manne G., Wright J. (2010) Innovation and the limits of antitrust. Journal of Competition Law and Economics 6(1): 153–202
O’Brien, D. (2008). The Antitrust Treatment of Vertical Restraints: Beyond the Possibility Theorems. In Fredenberg, A. & S. Nyberg (Eds.), Report: The Pros and Cons of Vertical Restraints, Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.konkurrensverket.se/upload/Filer/Trycksaker/Rapporter/Pros&Cons/rap_pros_and_cons_vertical_restraints.pdf.
Page W., Lopatka J. (2009) The microsoft case: Antitrust, high technology, and consumer welfare. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Reback G. (2009) Free the Market!: Why only government can keep the marketplace competitive. Portfolio Hardcover, USA
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics producer price index, series identification numbers PCU33441333441312 (Microprocessors), Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?pc.
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act 137. (2008). Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/reports/236681.pdf (internal citations omitted).
Werden G. (1989) The role of stock market studies in formulating antitrust policy toward horizontal mergers. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 28: 22–38
Whinston M. (2001) Exclusivity and Tying in U. S. v. Microsoft: What we know, and don’t know. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2): 63–80
Wright J. (2006) Antitrust law and competition for distribution. Yale Journal of Regulation 23(2): 169–208
Wright, J. (2010). An antitrust analysis of the federal trade commission’s complaint against intel. ICLE Antitrust and Competition Policy White Paper Series. Retrieved May 15, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1624943.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank Patricia Grant for excellent research assistance and Samantha Zyontz for valuable comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, J.D. Does Antitrust Enforcement in High Tech Markets Benefit Consumers? Stock Price Evidence from FTC v. Intel. Rev Ind Organ 38, 387–404 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9297-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9297-5