Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the short-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) between the two different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

Methods

From January 2007 to June 2009, 97 patients who underwent three-incision subtotal MIE were enrolled in this retrospective study. Among them, 49 patients followed prevertebral route and 48 patients followed retrosternal route. The questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C-30 and OES-18) were applied to assess the HRQL of the patients before and 2, 4, 12, 24 weeks after operation.

Results

All the patients underwent operation with no mortality. No statistical difference was found in age, gender, serum albumin level, the level of growth in the esophagus, pathological diagnosis, tumor stage, operation time, blood loss or ICU stay between the two groups. The perioperative complication rate was 35.4% in retrosternal group and 32.7% in prevertebral group (P = 0.774). However, the rate of cervical anastomotic leak in the retrosternal group was much higher (20.8 vs. 6.1%, P = 0.033). But the rate of cardiac or pulmonary complication in the retrosternal group seemed to be lower (10.4 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.110). Besides, the rate of anastomotic stricture was similar (6.3 vs. 10.2%, P = 0.735). And all HRQL measures did not show major differences between the two groups before operation. However, at the time of 2 weeks after operation, the dysphagia and eating problem questionnaires scores were higher in retrosternal group than in prevertebral group, which meant that the patients in retrosternal group suffered more severe problems; meanwhile, the scores of global quality scale in retrosternal group was also lower, which indicated that the patients had a worse global quality of life. Whereas, at the time of 12 and 24 weeks after operation, the dyspnoea and reflux symptom questionnaire scores were lower in retrosternal group than in prevertebral group, which revealed that there were less problems in the patients of retrosternal group; meanwhile, the score of global quality scale in retrosternal group was higher conversely, which suggested that the patients gain a better status in global quality of life.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that retrosternal route may be a good alternative choice for MIE in view of better HRQL after operation, although it has higher risk of anastomotic leak that might lead to worse HRQL in early period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langenhoff, B., Krabbe, P., Wobbes, T., et al. (2001). Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. British Journal of Surgery, 88, 643–652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sweed, M. R., Schiech, L., Barsevick, A., et al. (2002). Quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29, 1127–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blazeby, J. M., Farndon, J. R., Donovan, J., et al. (2000). A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer, 88, 1781–1787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Djärv, T., Blazeby, J. M., & Lagergren, P. (2009). Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 1963–1968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kent, M. S., Schuchert, M., Fernando, H., et al. (2006). Minimally invasive esophagectomy: State of the art. Diseases of the Esophagus, 2006(19), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Altoki, N. (2005). En-bloc esophagectomy–the three-field dissection. The Surgical Clinics of North America, 85, 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akiyama, H., Tsurumaru, M., Udagawa, H., et al. (1994). Radical lymph nodes dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Annals of Surgery, 220, 364–373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, H., Feng, M., Tan, J., et al. (2010). Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Diseases of the Esophagus, 23, 408–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luketich, J. D., Alvelo-Rivera, M., & Buenaventura, P. O. (2003). Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 patients. Annals of Surgery, 238, 486–494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayers, P.M., Aaronson, N.K., Bjordal, K. (2001). On behalf of the EORTC quality of life study group, The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3rd ed. Brussels, Belgium: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

  11. Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., et al. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 139–144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuschieri, A., Shimi, S., & Banting, S. (1992). Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 37, 7–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan, L. J., Wang, Q., Feng, M. X., et al. (2008). Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal carcinoma [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 11, 24–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blazeby, J. M., Conroy, T., Hammerlid, E., et al. (2003). Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 39, 1384–1394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gawad, K. A., Hosch, S. B., & Bumann, D. (1999). How important is the route of reconstruction after esophagectomy: A prospective randomized study. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 94, 1490–1496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anegg, U., Lindenmann, J., Maier, A., et al. (2008). Influence of route of gastric transposition on oxygen supply at cervical oesophagogastric anastomoses. British Journal of Surgery, 95, 344–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kunisaki, C., Makino, H., Otsuka, Y., et al. (2007). Appropriate routes of reconstruction following transthoracic esophagectomy. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 54, 1997–2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mannell, A., McKnight, A., & Esser, J. D. (1990). Role of pyloroplasty in the retrosternal stomach: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. British Journal of Surgery, 77, 57–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katsoulis, I. E., Robotis, I., Kouraklis, G., et al. (2005). Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: The effect of the route of reconstruction. World Journal of Surgery, 29, 174–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng, B., Wang, R. W., Jiang, Y. G., et al. (2009). Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 35, 8–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibman, S., Smithers, B. M., Gotley, D. C., et al. (2006). Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Short- and long-term outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 428–433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parameswaran, R., Blazeby, J. M., Hughes, R., et al. (2010). Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive Oesophagectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 97, 525–531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orringer, M. B., & Sloan, H. (1975). Substernal gastric bypass of the excluded thoracic esophagus for palliation of esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 70, 836–851.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ngan, S. Y., & Wong, J. (1986). Lengths of different routes for esophageal replacement. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 91, 790–792.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coral, R. P., Constant-Neto, M., Silva, I. S., et al. (2003). Comparative anatomical study of the anterior and posterior mediastinum as access routes after esophagectomy. Diseases of the Esophagus, 16, 236–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, H., Lu, J. J., Zhou, J., et al. (2009). Anterior versus posterior routes of reconstruction after esophagectomy: A comparative anatomic study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 87, 400–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schuchert, M. J., Pettiford, B. L., Landreneau, J. P., et al. (2008). Transcervical gastric tube drainage facilitates patient mobility and reduces the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 12, 1479–1484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Urschel, J. D., Urschel, D. M., Miller, J. D., et al. (2001). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of route of reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. American Journal of Surgery, 182, 470–475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuwano, H., Ikebe, M., Baba, K., et al. (1993). Operative procedures of reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer and the postoperative quality of life. World Journal of Surgery, 17, 773–776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakajima, M., Kato, H., Miyazaki, T., et al. (2007). Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconstruction. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 54, 104–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Lanschot, J. J., Hop, W. C., Voormolen, M. H., et al. (1994). Quality of palliation and possible benefit of extra-anatomic reconstruction in recurrent dysphagia after resection of carcinoma of the esophagus. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 179, 705–713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Urschel, J. D. (2001). Does the interponat affect outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus, 14, 124–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazzitelli, D., Bedda, W., Petrova, D., et al. (2004). Right parasternal approach for aortic valve replacement after retrosternal gastropexy. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 25, 290–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonnetain, F., Bouché, O., Michel, P., et al. (2006). A comparative longitudinal quality of life study using the Spitzer quality of life index in a randomized multicenter phase III trial (FFCD 9102): Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced squamous resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Annals of Oncology, 17, 827–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Avery, K., Metcalfe, C., Barham, C. P., et al. (2007). Quality of life during potentially curative treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 94, 1369–1376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Djärv, T., Lagergren, J., Blazeby, J. M., et al. (2008). Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 95, 1121–1126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Hao Wang, Lijie Tan, Mingxiang Feng, Yi Zhang & Qun Wang

Authors
  1. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lijie Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingxiang Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijie Tan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Tan, L., Feng, M. et al. Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Qual Life Res 20, 179–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9742-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9742-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation