Skip to main content
Log in

Reporting for sale: the market for news coverage

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a formal model of the market for political news. Under reasonable market conditions and when the audience has psychological biases, it may be profitable for outlets to differentiate their coverage. Moreover, the implications of the model speak to a deeper impact of political polarization of the electorate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J., Merrill, S., & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASNE (1999). Examining our credibility: Perspectives of the public and the press (Technical report). American Society of Newspaper Editors, Reston, VA.

  • Baron, D. P. (2006). Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90(1–2), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovitz, G., Druckman, J., & Lupia, A. (2002). When can a news organization lead public opinion? Public Choice, 113, 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. (2008). Primetime spin: Media bias and belief confirming information. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(3), 633–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1974). The market for goods and the market for ideas. American Economic Review, 64(2), 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A. (2002). Slander: Liberal lies about the American right. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franken, A. (2003). Lies and the lying liars who tell them: A fair and balanced look at the Right. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Park, D., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., & Cortina, J. (2008). Red state, blue state, rich state, poor state: Why Americans vote the way they do. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006a). Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 280–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006b). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers (NBER working paper series). w12707.

  • Graber, D. A. (2006). Mass media and American politics. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M. J., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1970). Plurality maximization vs vote maximization: A spatial analysis with variable participation. The American Political Science Review, 64(3), 772–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. E., & Quinn, K. M. (2007). Assessing political positions of media (Working paper).

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcinese, V. (2009). Information acquisition, ideology and turnout: Theory and evidence from Britain. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 21(2), 237–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcinese, V., Puglisi, R., & Snyder, J. (2007). Partisan bias in economic news: Evidence on the agenda-setting behavior of U.S. newspapers (NBER Working Paper No. 13378).

  • Ledyard, J. (1984). The pure theory of large two-candidate elections. Public Choice, 44, 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noam, E. M. (1987). A pubic and private-choice model of broadcasting. Public Choice, 55, 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patty, J. W. (2002). Equivalence of objective in tow candidate elections. Public Choice, 112(1), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew (2004). Pew research center biennial news consumption curvey (News release). The Pew Research Center.

  • Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. L. (1993). Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In B. Grofman (Ed.), Information, participation, and choice (pp. 17–35). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M., & Schrag, J. (1999). First impressions matter: A model of confirmatory bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 37–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithies, A. (1941). Optimal location in spatial competition. Journal of Political Economy, 49(3), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Gasper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasper, J.T. Reporting for sale: the market for news coverage. Public Choice 141, 493–508 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9466-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9466-3

Keywords

Navigation