Skip to main content
Log in

Dictators, development, and the virtue of political instability

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large body of literature stresses the benefits of regime stability for economic growth in poor countries. This view, however, discounts the gains from threats to regime security when populations living under dictatorial regimes cannot benefit from the disciplining of political competition available to voters in democracies. This paper applies a model of economic growth to study the sources of the differences in economic performance and repression policy among dictatorships as well as the parallel in dictatorial regimes of the benefits achieved through political competition in democracies. Threats to the security of dictatorial regimes are shown to be a means of benefiting the population through the responses of the regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abed, G. T., & Gupta, S. (Eds.) (2002). Governance, corruption and economic performance. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1996). Getting it right. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., & Verdier, T. (2000). Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, N. F., & Nugent, J. B. (2002). Who is afraid of political instability? Journal of Development Economics, 67, 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, N. F., & Nugent, J. B. (2003). Aggregate investment and political instability: An econometric investigation. Economica, 70, 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, J., & Root, H. (1996). The key to the Asian miracle. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charap, H., & Harms, C. (1999). Institutionalized corruption and the kleptocratic state. IMF working paper 99/91, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

  • Easterly, W. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineer, M., & Usher, D. (1987). The distribution of income in a despotic society. Public Choice, 54, 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, J. D. (1996). Hitler’s willing executioner: Ordinary Germans and the holocaust. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. I. (1991). A general equilibrium model of insurrection. American Economic Review, 81, 912–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. I., & Noh, S. J. (1990). A theory of kleptocracy with probabilistic survival and reputation. Economics and Politics, 2, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. I., & Noh, S. J. (1994). Proprietary public finance and economic welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 53, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L. (2004). Nietzschean development failures. Public Choice, 119, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1991). The paradox of power. Economics and Politics, 3, 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1870). Essays, literary, moral, and political. London: Ward Lock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. N., & Winer, S. L. (2004). Tinpots, totalitarians (and democrats): An empirical investigation of the effects of economic growth on civil liberties and political rights. Public Choice, 118, 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Londregan, J., & Poole, K. (1991). Poverty, the coup trap, and the seizure of executive power. World Politics, 42, 151–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Sandler, T. (2002). Economic growth, civil wars and spatial spillovers. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973). The rise of the western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane, R. (1984). A probabilistic approach to the causes of coups d’etat. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overland, J., Simons, K.L. & Spagat, M. (2005). Political instability and growth in dictatorships. Public Choice, 125, 445–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (1985). Rationalizing revolutionary ideology. Econometrica, 53, 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. (2000). Political culture and economic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. (1991). Fallibility in human organization and political systems. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanhueza, R. (1999). The hazard rate of political regimes. Public Choice, 98, 337–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. J., & Velde, F. R. (1995). Macroeconomic features of the French revolution. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 474–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse-tung, M., & Griffith, B. S. (2005). On guerrilla warfare. Chapmaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Towards a theory of the rent-seeking society (pp. 97–112). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (2005). The social dilemma: of autocracy, revolution, coup d’état, and war. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, D. (1989). The dynastic cycle and the stationary state. American Economic Review, 79, 1031–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwimp, P. (2003). The political economy of coffee, dictatorship, and genocide. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (1990). The tinpot and the totalitarian: An economic theory of dictatorship. American Political Science Review, 84, 849–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (2004). Dictatorship. In C. K. Rowley & F. Schneider (Eds.), The encyclopedia of public choice (Vol. 1, pp. 77–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronen Bar-El.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bar-El, R. Dictators, development, and the virtue of political instability. Public Choice 138, 29–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9337-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9337-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation