Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an examination of the significance of residential sorting or self selection effects in understanding the impacts of the built environment on travel choices. Land use and transportation system attributes are often treated as exogenous variables in models of travel behavior. Such models ignore the potential self selection processes that may be at play wherein households and individuals choose to locate in areas or built environments that are consistent with their lifestyle and transportation preferences, attitudes, and values. In this paper, a simultaneous model of residential location choice and commute mode choice that accounts for both observed and unobserved taste variations that may contribute to residential self selection is estimated on a survey sample extracted from the 2000 San Francisco Bay Area household travel survey. Model results show that both observed and unobserved residential self selection effects do exist; however, even after accounting for these effects, it is found that built environment attributes can indeed significantly impact commute mode choice behavior. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the model findings for policy planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transport. Res. D 5(4), 235–263 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R.: Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences. Transport. Res. B 37(9), 837–855 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transport. Res. B 41(5), 506–526 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M.G., Sarmiento, S.: Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics. Urban Stud. 35(7), 1155–1169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: methodologies and empirical findings. Paper presented at the 11th International Association for Travel Behavior Research, Kyoto, August 2006

  • Cervero, R.: Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transport. Res. D 7(4), 265–284 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R., Duncan, M.: Residential self selection and rail commuting: a nested logit analysis. Working paper. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, 2002. http://www.uctc.net/papers/604.pdf

  • Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Am. J. Public Health 93(9), 1478–1483 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the three D’s: density, diversity and design. Transport. Res. D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Wu, K.: Influences of land use environments on commuting choices: an analysis of large U.S. metropolitan areas using the 1985 american housing survey. Working paper. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, CA, 1997. http://www.uctc.net/papers/669.pdf

  • Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review. J. Plann. Lit. 15(1), 3–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R., Crepeau, R.: Does neighborhood design influence travel? a behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transport. Res. D 3(4), 225–238 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment—synthesis. Transport. Res. Rec. 1780, 87–114 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., Page, W.: Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transport. Res. Rec. 1466, 53–62 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L.D., Pivo, G.: Impacts of mixed use and density on the utilization of three modes of travel: single occupant vehicle, transit and walking. Transport. Res. Rec. 1466, 44–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B., Gordon, P., Peers, J.: Effect of neotraditional neighborhood design on travel characteristics. Transport. Res. Rec. 1466, 63–70 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S.: Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transport. Res. D 1(2), 151–165 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.: Effect of free parking on commuter mode choice—evidence from travel diary data. Transport. Res. Rec. 1753, 35–42 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco bay area. Transportation 24(2), 125–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kockelman, K.M.: Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing and land use balance: evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Transport. Res. Rec. 1607, 116–125 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORPACE International, Inc. Bay Area Travel Survey Final Report, March 2002. ftp://ftp.abag.ca.gov/pub/mtc/planning/BATS/BATS2000/

  • Rajamani, J., Bhat, C.R., Handy, S., Knaap, S., Song, Y.: Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transport. Res. Rec. 1831, 158–165 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D.A., Joo, J.: The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transport. Res. D 9(2), 151–173 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? J. Transport. Geog. 13(1), 83–99 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board and Institute of Medicine (TRB-IOM): Does the built environment influence physical activity? examining the evidence. January, 2005. http://www.onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr282.pdf

  • Ye, X., Pendyala, R.M., Gottardi, G.: An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transport. Res. B 41(1), 96–113 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M.: The role of land use in travel mode choice: evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 70(3), 344–360 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M.: Travel choice with no alternative: can land use reduce automobiledependence? J. Plann. Educ. Res. 25(3), 311–326 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded in part by Environmental Protection Agency Grant R831837. The authors would like to thank Jessica Guo and Rachel Copperman for providing help with data related issues. Thanks to Lisa Macias for her help in formatting this document. Four anonymous referees provided valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Rawoof Pinjari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinjari, A.R., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R. et al. Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impact of the built environment on commute mode choice. Transportation 34, 557–573 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9127-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9127-7

Keywords

Navigation