Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three questions about Leplin’s reliabilism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jarrett Leplin’s paper is multifaceted; it’s rich with ideas, and I won’t even try to touch on all of them. Instead, I’d like to raise three questions about the paper: one about its definition of reliable method, one about its solution to the generality problem, and one about its answer to clairvoyance-type objections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, S., Bertholle, L. & Child, J. (1961). Mastering the Art of French Cooking, vol. 1. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1988), “Strong and weak justification,” in Philosophical Perspectives 2: Epistemology, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Christensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, D. Three questions about Leplin’s reliabilism. Philos Stud 134, 43–50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9019-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9019-2

Keywords

Navigation