Abstract
Jarrett Leplin’s paper is multifaceted; it’s rich with ideas, and I won’t even try to touch on all of them. Instead, I’d like to raise three questions about the paper: one about its definition of reliable method, one about its solution to the generality problem, and one about its answer to clairvoyance-type objections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, S., Bertholle, L. & Child, J. (1961). Mastering the Art of French Cooking, vol. 1. New York: Knopf.
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Goldman, A. (1988), “Strong and weak justification,” in Philosophical Perspectives 2: Epistemology, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, D. Three questions about Leplin’s reliabilism. Philos Stud 134, 43–50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9019-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9019-2