Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medication dispensing errors in Palestinian community pharmacy practice: a formal consensus using the Delphi technique

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background Medication dispensing errors (MDEs) are frequent in community pharmacy practice. A definition of MDEs and scenarios representing MDE situations in Palestinian community pharmacy practice were not previously approached using formal consensus techniques. Objective This study was conducted to achieve consensus on a definition of MDEs and a wide range of scenarios that should or should not be considered as MDEs in Palestinian community pharmacy practice by a panel of community pharmacists. Setting Community pharmacy practice in Palestine. Method This was a descriptive study using the Delphi technique. A panel of fifty community pharmacists was recruited from different geographical locations of the West Bank of Palestine. A three round Delphi technique was followed to achieve consensus on a proposed definition of MDEs and 83 different scenarios representing potential MDEs using a nine-point scale. Main outcome measure Agreement or disagreement of a panel of community pharmacists on a proposed definition of MDEs and a series of scenarios representing potential MDEs. Results In the first Delphi round, views of key contact community pharmacists on MDEs were explored and situations representing potential MDEs were collected. In the second Delphi round, consensus was achieved to accept the proposed definition and to include 49 (59 %) of the 83 proposed scenarios as MDEs. In the third Delphi round, consensus was achieved to include further 13 (15.7 %) scenarios as MDEs, exclude 9 (10.8 %) scenarios and the rest of 12 (14.5 %) scenarios were considered equivocal based on the opinions of the panelists. Conclusion Consensus on a definition of MDEs and scenarios representing MDE situations in Palestinian community pharmacy practice was achieved using a formal consensus technique. The use of consensual definitions and scenarios representing MDE situations in community pharmacy practice might minimize methodological variations and their significant effects on the number and rate of MDEs reported in different studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. South DA, Skelley JW, Dang M, Woolley T. Near-miss transcription errors: a comparison of reporting rates between a novel error-reporting mechanism and a current formal reporting system. Hosp Pharm. 2015;50(2):118–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashcroft DM, Quinlan P, Blenkinsopp A. Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(5):327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shawahna R, Rahman NU, Ahmad M, Debray M, Yliperttula M, Decleves X. Electronic prescribing reduces prescribing error in public hospitals. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(21–22):3233–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shawahna R, Rahman NU, Ahmad M, Debray M, Yliperttula M, Decleves X. Impact of prescriber’s handwriting style and nurse’s duty duration on the prevalence of transcription errors in public hospitals. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(3–4):550–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shawahna R, Masri D, Al-Gharabeh R, Deek R, Al-Thayba L, Halaweh M. Medication administration errors from a nursing viewpoint: a formal consensus of definition and scenarios using a Delphi technique. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(3–4):412–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung KC, Bouvy ML, De Smet PA. Medication errors: the importance of safe dispensing. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(6):676–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Beso A, Franklin BD, Barber N. The frequency and potential causes of dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(3):182–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cina JL, Gandhi TK, Churchill W, Fanikos J, McCrea M, Mitton P, et al. How many hospital pharmacy medication dispensing errors go undetected? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(2):73–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Franklin BD, O’Grady K. Dispensing errors in community pharmacy: frequency, clinical significance and potential impact of authentication at the point of dispensing. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15(4):273–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Braund R, Furlan HM, George K, Havell MM, Murphy JL, West MK. Interventions performed by New Zealand community pharmacists while dispensing prescription medications. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32(1):22–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ocampo CC, Garcia-Cardenas V, Martinez-Martinez F, Benrimoj SI, Amariles P, Gastelurrutia MA. Implementation of medication review with follow-up in a Spanish community pharmacy and its achieved outcomes. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(5):931–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. James KL, Barlow D, McArtney R, Hiom S, Roberts D, Whittlesea C. Incidence, type and causes of dispensing errors: a review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(1):9–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Arifi MN. Community pharmacists’ attitudes toward dispensing errors at community pharmacy setting in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(3):195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buurma H, de Smet PA, van den Hoff OP, Egberts AC. Nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(1):85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chamba G, Bauguil G, Galiezot J. The role of the French community pharmacist in drug dispensing. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21(3):142–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khdour MR, Hallak HO, Hejaz H, Shaeen M, Dweib M. Patterns of NSAIDs use in Palestinian mid-territories: a prospective study of ambulatory patients in outpatient pharmacies. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2014;9(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chua SS, Wong IC, Edmondson H, Allen C, Chow J, Peacham J, et al. A feasibility study for recording of dispensing errors and near misses’ in four UK primary care pharmacies. Drug Saf. 2003;26(11):803–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Allan EL, Barker KN, Malloy MJ, Heller WM. Dispensing errors and counseling in community practice. Am Pharm. 1995;NS35(12):25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Flynn EA, Barker KN, Carnahan BJ. National observational study of prescription dispensing accuracy and safety in 50 pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43(2):191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McLeod MC, Barber N, Franklin BD. Methodological variations and their effects on reported medication administration error rates. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(4):278–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartley G, Dhillon S. An observational study of the prescribing and administration of intravenous drugs in a general hospital. Int J Pharm Pract. 1998;6(1):38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghaleb M, Barber N, Franklin BD, Wong I. What constitutes a prescribing error in paediatrics? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):352–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dean B, Barber N, Schachter M. What is a prescribing error? Qual Health Care. 2000;9(4):232–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Duffield C. The Delphi technique: a comparison of results obtained using two expert panels. Int J Nurs Stud. 1993;30(3):227–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Page A, Potter K, Clifford R, McLachlan A, Etherton-Beer C. Prescribing for Australians living with dementia: study protocol using the Delphi technique. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e008048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1221–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seifert SA, Jacobitz K. Pharmacy prescription dispensing errors reported to a regional poison control center. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2002;40(7):919–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bond CA, Raehl CL. Pharmacists’ assessment of dispensing errors: risk factors, practice sites, professional functions, and satisfaction. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(5):614–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flynn EA, Barker KN, Gibson JT, Pearson RE, Berger BA, Smith LA. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56(13):1319–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peterson GM, Wu MS, Bergin JK. Pharmacist’s attitudes towards dispensing errors: their causes and prevention. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999;24(1):57–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Asbury RP. Pharmacist liability: the doors of litigation are opening. Santa Clara Law Rev. 1999;40:907.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shah RK, Kentala E, Healy GB, Roberson DW. Classification and consequences of errors in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(8):1322–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, McKenna KJ, Clapp MD, Federico F, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ross L, Wallace J, Paton J. Medication errors in a paediatric teaching hospital in the UK: five years operational experience. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83(6):492–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferguson ND, Davis AM, Slutsky AS, Stewart TE. Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique. J Crit Care. 2005;20(2):147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Duerden MG, Hughes DA. Generic and therapeutic substitutions in the UK: are they a good thing? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(3):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Dahiyat F, Kayyali R. Evaluating patients’ perceptions regarding generic medicines in Jordan. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2013;6:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank all expert community pharmacists who participated in this study.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, New Campus, Building: 19, Office: 1340, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine

    Ramzi Shawahna

  2. An-Najah BioSciences Unit, Center for Poisons Control, Chemical and Biological Analyses, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

    Ramzi Shawahna

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

    Ramzi Shawahna, Aseel Haddad, Baraa Khawaja, Rand Raie, Sireen Zaneen & Tasneem Edais

Authors
  1. Ramzi Shawahna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aseel Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Baraa Khawaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rand Raie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sireen Zaneen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tasneem Edais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramzi Shawahna.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shawahna, R., Haddad, A., Khawaja, B. et al. Medication dispensing errors in Palestinian community pharmacy practice: a formal consensus using the Delphi technique. Int J Clin Pharm 38, 1112–1123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0338-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0338-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation