Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In Silico Prediction of Major Clearance Pathways of Drugs among 9 Routes with Two-Step Support Vector Machines

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The clearance pathways of drugs are critical elements for understanding the pharmacokinetics of drugs. We previously developed in silico systems to predict the five clearance pathway using a rectangular method and a support vector machine (SVM). In this study, we improved our classification system by increasing the number of clearance pathways available for our prediction (CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, and UDP-glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs)) and by accepting multiple major pathways.

Methods

Using the four default descriptors (charge, molecular weight, logD at pH 7.0, and unbound fraction in plasma), three kinds of SVM-based predictors based on traditional single-step approach or two-step focusing approaches with subset or partition clustering were developed. The two-step approach with subset clustering resulted in the highest prediction performance. The feature-selection of additional descriptors based on a greedy algorithm was employed to further improve the predictability.

Results

The prediction accuracy for each pathway was increased to more than 0.83 with the exception of CYP2C19 and UGTs pathways, whose accuracies were below 0.7. Prediction performance of CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and renal excretion pathways were found to be acceptable using external dataset.

Conclusions

We successfully constructed a novel SVM-based predictor for the multiple major clearance pathways based on chemical structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CYP:

Cytochrome P450

fup :

Protein unbound fraction in plasma

logD:

Octanol-water distribution coefficient

MW:

Molecular weight

OATP:

Organic anion transporting polypeptide

SVM:

Support vector machine

UGT:

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase

VDW:

Van der Waals

References

  1. Lavecchia A, Di Giovanni C. Lavecchia A. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery: a critical review. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(23):2839–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu T, Cao S, Su PC, Patel R, Shah D, Chokshi HB, et al. Hit identification and optimization in virtual screening: practical recommendations based on a critical literature analys. J Med Chem. 2013;56(17):6560–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kusama M, Toshimoto K, Maeda K, Hirai Y, Imai S, Chiba K, et al. In silico classification of major clearance pathways of drugs with their physiochemical parameters. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1362–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toshimoto K, Wakayama N, Kusama M, Maeda K, Sugiyama Y, Akiyama Y. In silico prediction of major drug clearance pathways by support vector machines with feature-selected descriptors. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42:1811–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry. In Vitro Metabolism- and Transporter- Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Studies; 2017 October. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM581965.pdf.

  6. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on the Investigation of Drug interactions; 2012 June. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/07/WC500129606.pdf.

  7. Kudo T, Hisaka A, Sugiyama Y, Ito K. Analysis of the repaglinide concentration increase produced by gemfibrozil and itraconazole based on the inhibition of the hepatic uptake transporter and metabolic enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(2):362–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinton LK, Galetin A, Houston JB. Multiple inhibition mechanisms and prediction of drug-drug interactions: status of metabolism and transporter models as exemplified by gemfibrozil-drug interactions. Pharm Res. 2008;25(5):1063–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gan J, Chen W, Shen H, Gao L, Hong Y, Tian Y, et al. Repaglinide-gemfibrozil drug interaction: inhibition of repaglinide glucuronidation as a potential additional contributing mechanism. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(6):870–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams JA, Hyland R, Jones BC, Smith DA, Hurst S, Goosen TC, et al. Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(11):1201–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakiyama Y, Yuki H, Moriya T, Hattori K, Suzuki M, Shimada K, et al. Predicting human liver microsomal stability with machine learning techniques. J Mol Graph Model. 2008;26:907–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita F, Hara H, Ito T, Hashida M. Novel hierarchical classification and visualization method for multiobjective optimization of drug properties: application to structure-activity relationship analysis of cytochrome P450 metabolism. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48:364–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexandrov V, van Albada G, Sloot P, Dongarra J. Computational Science - ICCS 2006, 1st Ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, UK; 2006.

  14. Varma MV, Feng B, Obach RS, Troutman MD, Chupka J, Miller HR, et al. Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance. J Med Chem. 2009;52:4844–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001;15:411–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Freitas RF, Bauab RL, Montanari CA. Novel application of 2D and 3D-similarity searches to identify substrates among cytochrome P450 2C9, 2D6, and 3A4. J Chem Inf Model. 2010;50(1):97–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimada T, Yamazaki H, Mimura M, Inui Y, Guengerich FP. Interindividual variations in human liver cytochrome P-450 enzymes involved in the oxidation of drugs, carcinogens and toxic chemicals: studies with liver microsomes of 30 Japanese and 30 Caucasians. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;270:414–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu LX, Amidon GL, Polli JE, Zhao H, Mehta MU, Conner DP, et al. Biopharmaceutics classification system: the scientific basis for biowaiver extensions. Pharm Res. 2002;19:921–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu CY, Benet LZ. Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm Res. 2005;22:11–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Varma MV, Steyn SJ, Allerton C, El-Kattan AF. Predicting clearance mechanism in drug discovery: extended clearance classification system (ECCS). Pharm Res. 2015;32:3785–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Sugiyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wakayama, N., Toshimoto, K., Maeda, K. et al. In Silico Prediction of Major Clearance Pathways of Drugs among 9 Routes with Two-Step Support Vector Machines. Pharm Res 35, 197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2479-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2479-1

Key words

Navigation