Abstract
Classification techniques applicable to the hyperspectral images do not extract deep features from the hyperspectral image efficiently. In this work, a deep learning approach is proposed to extract the deep features, and these features are utilized to propose a novel framework for classification of the hyperspectral image. The framework uses LPP, DCNN and logistic regression. Data of a hyperspectral image is processed by LPP for dimensionality reduction as it contains a large number of dimensions. Afterward, a DCNN is constructed with Autoencoders which is then passed to the logistic regression for classification. Proposed framework is tested on Indian Pines and Salinas data sets. High accuracy is achieved using the proposed framework in comparison of existing machine learning models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich J, Fisher RA (1997) The making of maximum likelihood 1912–1922. Stat Sci 12(3):162–176
Andrychowicz M, Denil M, Gomez S, Hoffman M W, Pfau D, Schaul T, de Freitas N (2016) Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent. In: Neural information processing systems, pp 1–17
Burger JE, Gowen AA (2011) The interplay of chemometrics and hyperspectral chemical imaging. In: Workshop on hyperspectral image and signal processing, evolution in remote sensing, pp 3–6
Burges CJC (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 2(2):121–167
Camps-Valls G, Bruzzone L (2005) Kernel based methods for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(6):1351–1362
Chang C-I (2004) New hyperspectral discrimination measure for spectral characterization. Opt Eng 43(8):1777
Chen Y, Lin Z, Zhao X, Member S, Wang G, Gu Y (2014) Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(6):2094–2107
Fagan ME, DeFries RS, Sesnie SE, Arroyo-Mora JP, Soto C, Singh A, Chazdon (2015) Mapping species composition of forests and tree plantations in northeastern Costa Rica with an Integration of Hyperspectral and Multitemporal Landsat Imagery. Remote Sens 7(5):5660–5696
Greene WWH (2012) Econometric analysis, vol 97. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
He X, Niyogi P (2004) Locality preserving projections. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 16:153
Hecht-Nielsen R (1989) Theory of the backpropagation neural network. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on neural networks, vol 1, pp 593–605
Ivakhnenko AG, Lapa VG (1965) Cybernetic predicting devices. CCM Information Corporation, New York
Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component. Springer series in statistics analysis. Springer, Berlin
Kohonen T (1988) An introduction to neural computing. Neural Netw 1(1):3–16
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1–9
Kruger N, Janssen P, Kalkan S, Lappe M, Leonardis A, Piater J, Wiskott L (2013) Deep hierarchies in the primate visual cortex: what can we learn for computer vision?. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(8):1847–1871
Kruse FA, Lefkoff AB, Boardman JW, Heidebrecht KB, Shapiro AT, Barloon PJ, Goetz AFH (1993) The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens Environ 44:145–163
Kruse FA, Boardman JW, Huntington JF (2003) Comparison of airborne hyperspectral data and EO-1 hyperion for mineral mapping. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(6 PART I):1388–1400
Kumar M, Seshasai MVR, Vara Prasad KS, Kamala V, Ramana KV, Dwivedi RS, Roy PS (2011) A new hybrid spectral similarity measure for discrimination among Vigna species. Int J Remote Sens 32(14):4041–4053
Le Roux N, Bengio Y (2010) Deep belief networks are compact universal approximators. Neural Comput 22(8):2192–2207
Melgani F, Bruzzone L (2002) Support vector machines for Classification of hyperspectral remote-sensing images. In: IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, vol 1, pp 506–508
Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science (New York, N.Y.) 290(5500):2323–2326
Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2008) Deep, narrow sigmoid belief networks are universal approximators. Neural Comput 20(11):2629–2636
Tenenbaum JB, De Silva V, Langford JC (2000) Sci Reprint 290:2319–2323
Tobergte DR, Curtis S (2013) Laplacian Eigenmap. J Chem Inf Model 53 (9):1689–1699
Vane G, Green RO (1993) The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sens Environ 44(3):127–143
Wu S, Zhong S, Liu Y (2017) Deep residual learning for image steganalysis. In: Multimedia tools and applications, pp 1–17
Yan C, Zhang Y, Xu J, Dai F, Li L, Dai Q, Wu F (2014) A highly parallel framework for HEVC coding unit partitioning tree decision on many-core processors. IEEE Signal Process Lett 21(5):573–576
Yan C, Zhang Y, Xu J, Dai F, Zhang J, Dai Q, Wu F (2014) Efficient parallel framework for HEVC motion estimation on many-core processors. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 24(12):2077–2089
Yan C, Xie H, Liu S, Yin J, Zhang Y, Dai Q (2018) Effective Uyghur language text detection in complex background images for traffic prompt identification. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(1):220–229
Yan C, Xie H, Yang D, Yin J, Zhang Y (2018) Supervised hash coding with deep neural network for environment perception of intelligent vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 19(1):284–295
Yang C, Everitt JH, Bradford JM (2008) Yield estimation from hyperspectral imagery using Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM). Trans ASABE 51(2):729–737
Yue J, Mao S, Li M (2016) A deep learning framework for hyperspectral image classification using spatial pyramid pooling. Remote Sens Lett 7(9):875–884
Zanaty EA (2012) Support Vector Machines (SVMs) versus Multilayer Perception (MLP) in data classification. Egypt Inf J 13(3):177–183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, S., Kasana, S.S. Efficient classification of the hyperspectral images using deep learning. Multimed Tools Appl 77, 27061–27074 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5904-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5904-x