Skip to main content
Log in

The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sound symbolism research provides considerable support for the relationship between sound and meaning. What is not well understood is how best to imbed sound symbolism to create meaningful brand names. This research investigates three basic decisions or issues that marketers face when embedding sound symbolism in brand names—i.e., (a) where to position the imbed, (b) what type of imbed to use, and (c) what is the effect of combining imbeds. Results of study 1 indicate that imbeds placed after the first syllable of a brand name communicate branding meaning. Also, brand meaning is better conveyed by vowels than consonants in a brand name. Combining consistent vowel and consonant imbeds in a brand name provides an additive effect with respect to communicating brand meaning. Results of study 2 show that combining consistent imbeds in a brand name can have a favorable impact on product choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors test what they term hard consonants (i.e., k and hard g) vs soft consonants (i.e., f and s).

References

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369–9372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metagcognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (2006). Finding the ‘S’ appeal. Frozen Food Age. May (54), 29.

  • Begley, S. (2002). StrawBerry is no BlackBerry: Building brands using sound. The Wall Street Journal, 26 (August): B1.

  • Cole, R., Yan, Y., Mak, B., Fanty, M., & Bailey, T. (1996). The contribution of consonants versus vowels to word recognition in fluent speech” Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ICASSP’96 (pp. 853–856). GA: Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. (1977). A name to conjure with: A discussion of the naming of new brands. European Journal of Marketing, 11(5), 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Small sounds, big deals: Phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, J. (1995). Giving drugs a good Name. The New York Times Magazine, September, 3, 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P. (1977). Toward an explanation of phonetic symbolism. Word, 28(3), 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., Abbs, B., & Lin, P. (2005). Serial position effects in nonword repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., & France, K. R. (1990). Using the phonemes of brand names to symbolize brand attributes. In W. Bearden & A. Parasuraman (Eds.), The AMA educators’ proceedings: Enhancing knowledge development in marketing (pp. 38–42). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. L. (1994). Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In J. L. Ohala, L. Hilton, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: Its nature, development and origin. Longdon, UK: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., Heckler, S. E., & Houston, M. J. (1998). The effects of brand name suggestiveness on advertising recall. Journal of Marketing, 62, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kewley-Port, D., Burkle, T. Z., & Lee, J. H. (2007). Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2365–2375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2000). Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters, 11(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: A study of semantics and sound symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2003). Creating meaningful brands: The relationship between brand name and brand mark. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R. (2009). Gender differences in new brand response. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R. R., & Athaide, G. A. (2012). Creating brand personality with brand names. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of Marketing (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krulich, R. (2011). Vowels control your brain. National Public Radio Blog. December 8. http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/12/07/143265882/vowels-control-your-brain.

  • Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic symbolism and brand name preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 406–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, I. R. (1978). Introducing practical phonetics. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., & Zaltman, G. (1987). Marketing Management. Chicago: The Dryden Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavia, T., & Costa, J. A. (1993). The winning number: Consumer perceptions of alpha-numeric brand names. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, K. R. (1989). Strategically desirable brand name characteristics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(4), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2007). Easy does it: The role of fluency in cue weighting. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. K. (1963). Phonetic symbolism re-examined. Psychological Bulletin, 60(2), 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ultan, R. (1978). Size-sound symbolism. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Phonology, Vol. 2, pp. 525–528). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, E., & Menon, G. (2004). A sound idea: Phonetic effect of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard R. Klink.

Additional information

Richard R. Klink and Lan Wu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klink, R.R., Wu, L. The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Mark Lett 25, 13–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9236-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9236-3

Keywords

Navigation