Skip to main content
Log in

How Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs Influence Ad Effectiveness, and Consumer and Physician Behavior

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from 1081 adults surveyed by the FDA were analyzed to explore consumers’ attitudes toward direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs, and the relation between these attitudes and health related consumption behaviors. We report the favorableness of consumers’ reactions to DTCA, and more importantly, demonstrate that consumers’ attitudes toward DTCA are related to whether they search for more information about a drug that is advertised, and ask their physician about the drug. Finally, we document how consumers’ attitudes towards DTCA relate to the prescription writing behavior of their physicians. Mediation analyses that more fully explicate these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikin, Katherine J. (2003). “Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs: Physician Survey Preliminary Results,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

  • Alperstein, Neil M. and Mark Peyrot. (1999). “Consumer Awareness of Prescription Drug Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research 33(4), 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonuccio, David O., William G. Danton, and Terry Michael McClanahan. (2003). “Building a Firewall Between Marketing and Science,” American Psychologist 58(12), 1028–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Ruben M. and David A. Kenny. (1986). “The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research–-Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, Rajeev and Michael L. Ray. (1987). “Situational Effects of Advertising Repetition: The Moderating Influence of Motivation, Ability and Opportunity to Respond,” Journal of Consumer Research 12(4), 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, Rajeev and Douglas M. Stayman. (1990). “The Role of Mood in Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Consumer Research 17, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Robert A., Richard L. Kravitz, and Michael S. Wilkes. (1999). “Advertisement-Induced Prescription Drug Requests: Patients’ Anticipated Reactions to a Physician Who Refuses,” Journal of Family Practice 48(9), 446–452.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Robert A., Michael S. Wilkes, and Richard L. Kravitz. (2000). “The Educational Value of Consumer-Targeted Prescription Drug Print Advertising,” Journal of Family Practice 49(12), 1092–1098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, John E. (2002). “Public Policy Issues in Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 21(2), 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Tom. (2002). IMC: Using Advertising and Promotion to Build Brands. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russell H. (1990). “Multiple Processes by which Attitude Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework.” In Mark P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, pp. 75–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gönül, Füsun F., Franklin Carter, and Jerry Wind. (2000). “What Kind of Patients and Physicians Value Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs,” Health Care Management Science 3, 215–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Jerome R. and Michael S. Wilkes. (1999). “Direct to Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs: An Idea Whose Time Should Not Have Come,” British Medical Journal 318, 1301–1302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmer, Alan F. (2001). “Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising Builds Bridges Between Patients and Physicians,” Journal of the American Medical Association 281(4), 380–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, John A. (1977). Consumer Behavior: Application of Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, Ellen. J. and Judith Rodin. (1976). “The Effects of Enhanced Personal Responsibility: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34(2), 191–198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., B. Chanowitz, M. Palmerino, S. Jacobs, M. Rhodes, and P. Thayer. (1990). “Nonsequential Development and Aging,” In C. N. Alexander and E. J. Langer (eds.), Higher Stages of Human Development: Perspectives on Adult Growth. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Richard. (2001). “Direct-To-Consumer Advertising,” Orthopedic Technology Review 3(1).

  • MacKenzie, Scott B., Richard J. Lutz, and George E. Belch. (1986). “The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations,” Journal of Marketing Research 23, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine and Erika Matulich. (1993). “A Model of Consumers’ Preventive Health Behaviors: The Role of Health Motivation and Health Ability,” Journal of Consumer Research 20(2), 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, Sridhar, Ramarao Desiraju, and Pradeep K. Chintagunta. (2004). “Return on Investment Implications for Pharmaceutical Promotional Expenditures: The Role of Marketing-Mix Interactions,” Journal of Marketing 68(4), 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Paul. (1999). “Multiattribute Utility Models.” In P. E. Earl and S. Kemp (eds.), Consumer Research and Economic Psychology. Northampon, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • PharmaVoice (2003). “How 5/19 Changed the Industry Forever,” June, pp. 46–48.

  • Prosser, Helen, Solomon Almond, and Tom Walley. (2003). “Influences on GPs’ Decision to Prescribe New Drugs-The Importance of Who Says What,” Family Practice 20(1), 61–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R. and Russell H. Fazio. (1992). “On the Orienting Value of Attitudes: Attitude Accessibility as a Determinant of an Object’s Attraction of Visual Attention,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 198–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, David M., Frank R. Kardes, David C. Houghton, Edward A. Ho., and Steven S. Posavac. (2003). “Overestimating the Importance of the Given Information in Multiattribute Consumer Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(3), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, David M., Frank R. Kardes, and Carol Sansone. (1991). “Remembering Less and Inferring More: Effects of Time of Judgment on Inferences about Unknown Attributes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(4), 546–554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woloshin, Steven, Lisa M. Schwartz, Jennifer Tremmel, and Gilbert H. Welch. (2001). “Direct-To-Consumer Advertisements for Prescription Drugs: What Are Americans Being Sold?” The Lancet 358, 1141–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wosi’nska, Marta. (2002). “Just What the Patient Ordered? Direct-to-Consumer Advertising and the Demand for Pharmaceutical Products,” Working paper, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Herzenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herzenstein, M., Misra, S. & Posavac, S.S. How Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs Influence Ad Effectiveness, and Consumer and Physician Behavior. Market Lett 15, 201–212 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-0458-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-0458-x

Keywords

Navigation