Skip to main content
Log in

Flow-related disturbance creates a gradient of metacommunity types within stream networks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Metacommunities are sets of local communities linked by dispersal. Their characteristics are defined by both large-scale spatial processes such as dispersal, and local environmental processes, although which factors are likely to predominate in a given situation is poorly understood.

Objectives

We investigated whether flow regime at the network-scale helped explain the relative importance of spatial and local-environmental processes in structuring stream metacommunities.

Methods

Spatial sampling of stream macroinvertebrates was carried out in stream networks in New Zealand. Local environmental variables were also measured throughout the stream networks, while hydrographs were modelled and calibrated with field measurements.

Results

Significant associations with both spatial and local-environmental predictor variables were found, consistent with several metacommunity types. In particular, two measures of flow regime were associated with different metacommunity types. Thus, stream networks characterised by a period of stability just before sampling, and networks sampled after a long period of instability, had more significant spatial structuring of metacommunities than those of intermediate flow stability. The importance of spatial processes in structuring the network metacommunities also increased with time since the last community-resetting flow. Our results therefore suggested that metacommunity type depended on the flow regime. Dispersal traits and network topology also helped explain some of the variation among the metacommunities.

Conclusions

Overall, our findings conform to theoretical predictions related to dispersal limitation and topology, and indicate that metacommunity models need to be dynamic to capture processes in both space and time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ, Gribble NA (1998) Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set. Austral Ecol 23:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004) The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJ, Smith RA, Duncan MJ (1999) Velocity and sediment disturbance of periphyton in headwater streams: biomass and metabolism. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:222–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Swan CM (2010) Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 79:571–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RE (2010) Spatial pattern and community assembly: does the configuration of stream networks influence their community structure? Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch

  • Campbell RE, McIntosh AR (2013) Do isolation and local habitat jointly limit the structure of stream invertebrate assemblages? Freshw Biol 58:128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaput-Bardy A, Fleurant C, Lemaire C, Secondi J (2009) Modelling the effect of in-stream and overland dispersal on gene flow in river networks. Ecol Model 220:3589–3598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM (2007) Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17430–17434

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2000) PRIMER (Plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research) v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, MacNally R, Bond N, Lake PS (2008) Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshw Biol 53:1707–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen B, Biggs BJF (1998) Stream flow variability indices for riverine environmental studies. In: Wheater H, Kirby C (eds) Hydrology in a changing environment. Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society international conference. Wiley, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Coté D, Kehler DG, Bourne C, Wiersma WF (2009) A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecol 24:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Death RG (2010) Disturbance and riverine benthic communities: what has it contributed to general ecological theory? River Res Appl 26:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan MJ, Suren AM, Brown SLR (1999) Assessment of streambed stability in steep, bouldery streams: development of a new analytical technique. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economo EP, Keitt TH (2008) Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: a network approach. Ecol Lett 11:52–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF (2002) Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 83:3243–3249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant EHC, Lowe WH, Fagan WF (2007) Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. Ecol Lett 10:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (1996) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, Desender K, Aviron S, Bailey D, Diekotter T, Lens L, Liira J, Schweiger O, Speelmans M, Vandomme V, Bugter R (2009) Pervasive effects of dispersal limitation on within- and among-community species richness in agricultural landscapes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:607–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM, Schmidt DJ, Finn DS (2009) Genes in streams: using DNA to understand the movement of freshwater fauna and their riverine habitat. Bioscience 59:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffney PM, Greene CM, Hall JE, Davies JR (2006) Tributary streams create spatial discontinuities in habitat, biological productivity, and diversity in mainstem rivers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2518–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labonne J, Ravigne V, Parisi B, Gaucherel C (2008) Linking dendritic network structures to population demogenetics: the downside of connectivity. Oikos 117:1479–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, McPeek MA (2006) Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 87:1399–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori F, Malmqvist B (2009) Deterministic control on community assembly peaks at intermediate levels of disturbance. Oikos 118:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe WH, Likens GE, Power ME (2006) Linking scales in stream ecology. Bioscience 56:591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei CD, Peacock KA, Townsend CR (1999) Patchy surface stone movement during disturbance in a New Zealand stream and its potential significance for the fauna. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1091–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Munguia P, Kneitel JM, Miller TE (2003) Community assembly time and the relationship between local and regional species richness. Oikos 103:618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB (2007) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.9-25. http://cran.r-project.org/

  • Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EE, Theobald DM, Ver Hoef JM (2007) Geostatistical modelling on stream networks: developing valid covariance matrices based on hydrologic distance and stream flow. Freshw Biol 52:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Olden JD, Vieira NKM, Finn DS, Simmons MP, Kondratieff BC (2006) Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:730–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson RA, Eyre MD, Rushton SP (2005) The influence of stream invertebrate composition at neighbouring sites on local assemblage composition. Freshw Biol 50:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TW, Lundholm JT (2010) Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography 33:648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starzomski BM, Srivastava DS (2007) Landscape geometry determines community response to disturbance. Oikos 116:690–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Townsend C (2006) A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Anim Ecol 75:476–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JR, Lake PS, Downes BJ (2002) The effect of hydrological disturbance on the impact of a benthic invertebrate predator. Ecology 83:628–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD (2006) The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res Appl 22:123–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Arbuckle CJ, Crowl TA, Scarsbrook MR (1997a) The relationship between land use and physicochemistry, food resources and macroinvertebrate communities in tributaries of the Taieri River, New Zealand: a hierarchically scaled approach. Freshw Biol 37:177–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Scarsbrook MR, Doledec S (1997b) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, refugia, and biodiversity in streams. Limnol Oceanogr 42:938–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Meutter F, De Meester L, Stoks R (2007) Metacommunity structure of pond macroinvertebrates: effects of dispersal mode and generation time. Ecology 88:1687–1695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1994) Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourn MJ, Rounick JS, Cowie B (1981) Are New Zealand stream ecosystems really different? NZ J Mar Freshw Res 15:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourn MJ, Gregson KLD, Dolphin CH (2006) Guide to the aquatic insects of New Zealand [4th edition]. Bull Entomol Soc NZ 14:1–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Zhang D (2008) A nearly neutral model of biodiversity. Ecology 89:248–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Freshwater Ecology Research Group at the University of Canterbury for assistance with field and laboratory work. Otago data sets were provided by Colin Townsend. The manuscript was improved greatly by comments on drafts from Jon O’Brien, Colin Townsend, Russell Death, Jake Overton and two anonymous reviewers. The project was funded by the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust. REC was supported by a Tertiary Education Commission Top Achiever Doctoral Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca E. Campbell.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3398 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, R.E., Winterbourn, M.J., Cochrane, T.A. et al. Flow-related disturbance creates a gradient of metacommunity types within stream networks. Landscape Ecol 30, 667–680 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0164-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0164-x

Keywords

Navigation