Abstract
Introduction
Habitat loss is the leading cause of extinctions on the planet. However, negative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity can be reduced if resources in urban or semi-natural areas in the surrounding matrix can be used by wildlife.
Methods
We investigated the influence of floral and nesting resources in urban- and forest-associated oak-savannah fragments, surrounding urban and forest matrix, and urban areas spatially independent from oak-savannah habitat on pollinator community composition in a fragmented oak-savannah ecosystem.
Results
Both independent urban and urban matrix sites supported high abundance and richness of plants and pollinators relative to other fragment categories, especially towards the end of the season when plants and pollinators in oak-savannah fragments were scarce. A species of particular conservation concern in our region, Bombus occidentalis, was supported by late-flowering resources in our urban sites. Forest-associated oak-savannah fragments were missing late-season species while urban-associated fragments supported high abundance and richness of mid- to late-season pollinators, likely due to supplemental use of floral resources in the urban matrix. Female cavity-nesting and ground-nesting bees were not restricted by the availability of natural nesting resources we expected them to require (e.g. small cavities, bare soil).
Conclusion
These results provide important information on native pollinators in a highly fragmented habitat, and suggest that we should consider matrix quality in conservation planning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667
Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ, Roulston TH, Williams NM (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera : Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644
Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461
Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366
Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175
Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:589–606
Eltz T, Brühl CA, van der Kaars S, Linsenmair KE (2002) Determinants of stingless bee nest density in lowland dipterocarp forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia 131:27–34
Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74
Franklin JF, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:349–350
Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard Jr. RO, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91:223–229
Greenleaf SS, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596
Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251
Hinners SJ, Kearns CA, Wessman CA (2012) Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage. Ecol Appl 22:1923–1935
Hobbs GA (1966) Ecology of species of Bombus Latr. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. IV. Subgenus Fervidobombus Skorikov. Can Entomol 98:33–39
Hobbs GA (1967) Ecology of species of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta VI. Subgenus Pyrobombus. Can Entomol 99:1271–1292
Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2008) Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos 117:354–361
Jauker F, Diekötter T, Schwarzbach F, Wolters V (2009) Pollinator dispersal in an agricultural matrix: opposing responses of wild bees and hoverflies to landscape structure and distance from main habitat. Landscape Ecol 24:547–555
Jha S, Kremen C (2013) Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:555–558
Kennedy C, Marra P, Fagan W, Neel M (2010) Landscape matrix and species traits mediate responses of Neotropical resident birds to forest fragmentation in Jamaica. Ecol Monogr 80:651–669
Klein A-M, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:303–313
Laurance W (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biol Conserv 141:1731–1744
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science B. V, Amsterdam
Mandelik Y, Winfree R, Neeson T, Kremen C (2012) Complementary habitat use by wild bees in agro-natural landscapes. Ecol Appl 22:1535–1546
McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach
McCune B, Mefford MJ (2005) PC-ORD, multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 5 for windows edition. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach
McFrederick QS, LeBuhn G (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? Biol Conserv 129:372–382
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890
Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore
Neame LA, Griswold T, Elle E (2013) Pollinator nesting guilds respond differently to urban habitat fragmentation in an oak-savannah ecosystem. Insect Conserv Diver 6:57–66
Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol Conserv 70:265–276
Oksanen AJ, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 10 June 2013
Osborne JL, Martin AP, Shortall CR, Todd AD, Goulson D, Knight ME, Hale RJ, Sanderson RA (2008) Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats. J Appl Ecol 45:784–792
Potts SG, Willmer P (1997) Abiotic and biotic factors influencing nest-site selection by Halictus rubicundus, a ground-nesting halictine bee. Ecol Entomol 22:319–328
Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer P (2003) Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84:2628–2642
Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S, O’Toole C, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer P (2005) Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:78–85
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
RCore Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Roulston TH, Goodell K (2011) The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annu Rev Entomol 56:293–312
SAS Institute (2011) SAS/STAT software version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Statistics Canada (2012) Victoria, British Columbia (Code 935) and British Columbia (Code 59) (table). Census Profile. 2011 Census. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 98-316-XWE. Ottawa. Released October 24, 2012. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed 7 Mar 2014
Svensson B, Lagerlöf J, Svensson BG (2000) Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:247–255
Tarrant S, Ollerton J, Rahman ML, Tarrant J, McCollin D (2013) Grassland restoration on landfill sites in the East Midlands, United Kingdom: An evaluation of floral resources and pollinating insects. Restor Ecol 21:560–568
Westrich P (1996) Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. In: Matheson A, Buchanan S, O’Toole C et al (eds) The Conservation of Bees. Academic Press, London, pp 1–16
Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921
Williams NM, Regetz J, Kremen C (2012) Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees. Ecology 93:1049–1058
Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223
Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vázquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076
Winfree R, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP (2011) Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 42:1–22
Wray JC, Neame LA, Elle E (2014) Floral resources, body size, and surrounding landscape influence bee community assemblages in oak-savannah. Ecol Entomol 39:83–93
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smit GM (2007) Analysing ecological data. Springer, New York
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to T. Haapalainen for exceptional assistance in the field, and to E. Reimer and A. Martins for assistance in the lab. D. Green, M. Krawchuk, the Elle lab, and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. S. C. Anderson assisted with plotting the redundancy analysis. Site access was granted by the Capitol Regional District, the National Research Council Canada, Districts of Saanich, Central Saanich, Municipalities of Oak Bay and Esquimalt and City of Victoria, and 62 hospitable property owners. Funding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Canadian Pollination Initiative (NSERC-CANPOLIN) and a Discovery Grant to E. Elle, and a Canada Graduate Scholarship to J. Wray. This is publication No. 114 of NSERC-CANPOLIN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wray, J.C., Elle, E. Flowering phenology and nesting resources influence pollinator community composition in a fragmented ecosystem. Landscape Ecol 30, 261–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0121-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0121-0