Abstract
Residential mobility is one documented stressor contributing to higher delinquency and worse educational outcomes. Sensitive period life course models suggest that certain developmental stages make individuals more susceptible to the effects of an exposure, like residential mobility, on outcomes. However, most prior research is observational, and has not examined heterogeneity across age or gender that may inform sensitive periods, even though it may have important implications for the etiology of adolescent development. Moreover, there are important translational implications for identifying the groups most vulnerable to residential mobility to inform how to buffer adverse effects of moving. In this study, low-income families were randomized to residential mobility out of public housing into lower poverty neighborhoods using a rental subsidy voucher (“experimental voucher condition”), and were compared to control families remaining in public housing. The sample was comprised of 2829 youth (51% female; 62% Non-Hispanic Black, 31% Hispanic, 7% other race). At baseline, youth ranged from 5 to 16 years old. This study hypothesized that random assignment to the housing voucher condition would generate harmful effects on delinquency and educational problems, compared to the control group, among boys who were older at baseline. The results confirmed this hypothesis: random assignment to the experimental voucher condition generating residential mobility caused higher delinquency among boys who were 13–16 years old at baseline, compared to same-age, in-place public housing controls. However, residential mobility did not affect delinquency among girls regardless of age, or among boys who were 5–12 years old at baseline. The pattern of results for educational problems was similar but weaker. Families with teenage boys are particularly vulnerable to residential transitions. Incorporating additional supports into housing programs may help low-income, urban families to successfully transition to lower poverty neighborhoods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo-Garcia, D., Osypuk, T. L., McArdle, N., & Williams, D. (2008). Toward a policy-relevant analysis of geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in child health. Health Affairs, 27(2), 321–333.
Acevedo-Garcia, D., Osypuk, T. L., Werbel, R. E., Meara, E. R., Cutler, D. M., & Berkman, L. F. (2004). Does housing mobility policy improve health? Housing Policy Debate, 15(1), 49–98.
Adam, E. K., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2002). Home sweet home(s): parental separations, residential moves, and adjustment problems in low-income adolescent girls. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 792–805.
Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: an overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.
Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. (1994). Family Structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: a research note. Demography, 31(4), 575–584.
Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Kuh, D. (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges, and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 285–293.
Briggs, Xd. S. (1997). Yonkers revisited: the early impacts of scattered-site public housing on families and neighborhoods. a report to the ford foundation. New York, NY: Columbia University Teachers College, Harvard University, and Michigan State University.
Briggs, Xd. S., Popkin, S. J., Goering, J., (2010). Moving to opportunity: the story of an american experiment to fight ghetto poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Freeman.
Brown, D., Benzeval, M., Gayle, V., Macintyre, S., O’Reilly, D., & Leyland, A. (2012). Childhood residential mobility and health in late adolescence and adulthood: findings from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 66, 942–950.
Browning, C. R., & Soller, B. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape, 16(1), 165–196.
Casciano, R., & Massey, D. S. (2012a). Neighborhood disorder and individual economic self-sufficiency: New evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Social Science Research, 41(4), 802–819.
Casciano, R., & Massey, D. S. (2012b). School context and educational outcomes: results from a quasi-experimental study. Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), 180–204.
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902.
Clampet-Lundquist, S., Edin, K., Kling, J. R., & Duncan, G. J. (2011). Moving teenagers out of high-risk neighorhoods: how girls fare better than boys. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1154–1189.
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: the culture of the gang. New York, NY: Free Press.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cole, S. R., & Hernan, M. A. (2008). Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. American Journal of, 168(6), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn164.
DeWit, D. (1998). Frequent childhood geographic relocation: its impact on drug use initiation and the development of alcohol and other drug-related problems among adolescents and young adults. Addictive Behaviors, 23(5), 623–634.
Duncan, D. T. & Kawachi, I. (Eds.) (2018). Neighborhoods and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ertel, K. A., Glymour, M. M., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F. (2007). Frailty modifies effectiveness of psychosocial intervention in recovery from stroke [Article]. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(6), 511–522.
Farrington, D. (1986). Age and crime. Crimean and Justice, 7, 189–250.
Farrington, D. P. (2005). The integrated cognitive antisocial potential (ICAP) theory. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated Developmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Fauth, R. C., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Early impacts of moving from poor to middle-class neighborhoods on low-income youth. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(4), 415–439.
Feins, J. D., & McInnis, D. (2001). The interim impact evaluation for the moving to opportunity demonstration, C-OPC-21484. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
Freedman, D. A. (2008). On regression adjustments in experiments with several treatments. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(1), 176–196.
Gasper, J., DeLuca, S., & Estacion, A. (2010). Coming and going: explaining the effects of residential and school mobility on adolescent delinquency. Social Science Research, 39, 459–476.
Glymour, M. M., Osypuk, T. L., & Rehkopf, D. H. (2013). Invited commentary: off-roading with social epidemiology – exploration, causation, translation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(6), 858–863.
Goering, J., & Feins, J. (2003). Choosing a better life? evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Goering, J., Kraft, J., Feins, J., McInnis, D., Holin, M. J., & Elhassan, H. (1999). Moving to opportunity for fair housing demonstration program: current status and initial findings. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing & Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
Graif, C. (2015). Delinquency and gender moderation in the Moving to Opportunity intervention: the role of extended neighborhoods. Criminology, 53(3), 366–397.
Haelermans, C., & De Witte, K. (2015). Does residential mobility improve educational outcomes? Evidence from Netherlands. Social Science Research, 52, 351–369.
Hango, D. (2006). The long-term effect of childhood residential mobility on educational attainment. Sociological Quarterly, 47, 631–664.
Haveman, R., Wolfe, B., & Spaulding, J. (1991). Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion. Demography, 28(1), 133–157.
Haynie, D., & South, S. (2005). Residential mobility and adolescent violence. Social Forces, 84(1), 361–374.
Haynie, D., South, S., & Bose, S. (2006a). The company you keep: adolescent mobility and peer behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3), 397–426.
Haynie, D., South, S., & Bose, S. (2006b). Residential mobility and attempted suicide among adolescents: an individual-level analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(4), 693–721.
Hoffmann, J., & Johnson, R. (1998). A national portrait of family structure and adolescent drug use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(3), 633–645.
Jargowsky, P. (2015). Architecture of segregation: civil unrest, the concentration of poverty, and public policy. issue brief. The Century Foundation.
Jelleyman, T., & Spencer, N. (2008). Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62, 584–592.
Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2017). The state of the nation’s housing: 2017. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Kahan, B. C., Jairath, V., Doré, C. J., & Morris, T. P. (2014). The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials, 15(1), 139 https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-139.
Katz, L. F., Kling, J. R., & Liebman, J. B. (2001). Moving to Opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 607–654.
Keels, M., Duncan, G. J., Deluca, S., Mendenhall, R., & Rosenbaum, J. (2005). Fifteen years later: can residential mobility programs provide a long-term escape from neighborhood segregation, crime, and poverty? Demography, 42(1), 51–73.
Kessler, R. C., Duncan, G., Gennetian, L., Katz, L., Kling, J. R., & Sampson, N. A., et al. (2014). Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence. JAMA, 311(9), 937–947.
Kingsley, G. T. (2017). Trends in housing problems and federal housing assistance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75(1), 83–119.
Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 87–130.
Kuh, D., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Lynch, J., Hallqvist, J., & Power, C. (2003). Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health, 57(10), 778–783.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to Opportunity: an experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health [Abstract]. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1576–1582.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2004). A randomized study of neighborhood effects on low-income children’s educational outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 488–507.
Leventhal, T., & Newman, S. (2010). Housing and child development. Children and Youth Service Review, 32(9), 1165–1174.
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., & Kling, J. R., et al. (2012). Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science, 337(6101), 1505–1510.
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Hirschfield, P. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime: evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 655–680.
Ludwig, J., Liebman, J. B., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., & Kessler, R. C., et al. (2008). What can we learn about neighborhood effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment? A comment on Clampet-Lundquist and Massey. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 144–188.
Ludwig, J., Sanbonmatsu, L., Gennetian, L., Adam, E., Duncan, G. J., & Katz, L. F., et al. (2011). Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes – a randomized social experiment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365(16), 1509–1519.
McCormick, M. C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Buka, S. L., Goldman, J., Yu, J., & Salganik, M., et al. (2006). Early intervention in low birth weight premature infants: results at 18 years of age for the infant health and development program. Pediatrics, 117(3), 771–780.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
Mok, P. L., Webb, R. T., Appleby, L., & Pederson, C. B. (2016). Full spectrum of mental disorders linked with childhood residential mobility. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 78, 57–64.
National Low Income Housing Coalition (2011). Federal budget & approps, HUD budget charts, FY11 and FY12 Budget Chart for Selected HUD Programs, Updated April 27, 2011. https://www2398.ssldomain.com/nlihc/template/page.cfm?id=28 or http://www.nlihc.org/doc/FY11_12_Budget_Chart_HUD.pdf.
Nguyen, Q. C., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Schmidt, N. M., & Osypuk, T. L. (2017). The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants’ residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 27(3), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210.
Nguyen, Q. C., Rehkopf, D. H., Schmidt, N. M., & Osypuk, T. L. (2016). Heterogeneous effects of housing vouchers on the mental health of US adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 106(4), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303006.
Oakes, J. M. (2004). The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Social Science & Medicine, 58(10), 1929–1952.
Oakes, J. M. (2014). Invited commentary: repeated measures, selection bias, and effect identification in neighborhood effect studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 180(8), 785–787.
OECD (2017). PH3.1 public spending on housing allowances. In L. a. S. A. OECD – Social Policy Division – Directorate of Employment (Ed.). Paris, France: OECD Affordable Housing Databasoe.
Orr, L., Feins, J. D., Jacob, R., Beecroft, E., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Katz, L. F., et al. (2003). Moving to opportunity for fair housing demonstration program: interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research 341.
Osypuk, T. L. (2013). Future research directions for understanding neighborhood contributions to health disparities. Revue d’Epidemiologie et Délelőtt Sante Publique, 61(Supplement 2), S61–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2013.03.040.
Osypuk, T. L., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2010). Beyond individual neighborhoods: a geography of opportunity perspective for understanding racial/ethnic health disparities. Health & Place, 16(6), 1113–1123.
Osypuk, T. L., Joshi, P., Geronimo, K., & Acevedo-Garcia., D. (2014). Do social and economic policies influence health? a review. Current Epidemiology Reports, 1(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-014-0013-5.
Osypuk, T. L., Schmidt, N. M., Bates, L. M., Tchetgen-Tchetgen, E. J., Earls, F. J., & Glymour, M. M. (2012a). Gender and crime victimization modify neighborhood effects on adolescent mental health. Pediatrics, 130(3), 472–481.
Osypuk, T. L., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Earls, F. J., Lincoln, A., & Schmidt, N. M., et al. (2012b). Differential mental health effects of neighborhood relocation among youth in vulnerable families. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(12), 1284–1294.
Petersen, M. L., Porter, K. E., Gruber, S., Wang, Y., & van der Laan, M. J. (2012). Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21(1), 31–54.
Pettit, B. (2004). Moving and children’s social connections: neighborhood context and the consequences of moving for low-income families. Sociological Forum, 19, 285–311.
Pocock, S. J., Assmann, S. E., Enos, L. E., & Kasten, L. E. (2002). Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2917–2930.
Pollack, C., Green, H. J., Kennedy, D., Griffin, B., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., & Burkhauser, S., et al. (2014). The impact of public housing on social networks: a natural experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1642–1649.
Popkin, S., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. A. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: research findings and policy challenges. Washington DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution.
Popkin, S. J., Leventhal, T., & Weismann, G. (2008). Girls in the ‘Hood: the importance of feeling safe. metropolitan housing and communities center. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Porter, L., & Vogel, M. (2014). Residential mobility and delinquency revisited: causation or selection? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 187–214.
Pribesh, S., & Downey, D. B. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance? Demography, 36(4), 521–534.
Quillian, L. (2003). How long are exposures to poor neighborhoods? The long-term dynamics of entry and exit from poor neighborhoods. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 221–249.
Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 231–269.
Rudolph, K.E., Sofrygin, O., Schmidt, N.M., Crowder, R., Glymour, M.M., Ahern, J., et al. (2018). Mediation of neighborhood effects on adolescent substance use by the school and peer environments in a large-scale housing voucher experiment. Epidemiology (In press).
Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 189–231.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
Sanbonmatsu, L., Kling, Jeffrey, R., Duncan, Greg, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Neighborhoods and academic achievement: Results from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. The Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 649–691.
Sanbonmatsu, L., Ludwig, J., Katz, L. F., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., & Kessler, R. C., et al. (2011). Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Final Impacts Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
Sanbonmatsu, L., Marvakov, J., Potter, N., Yang, F., Adam, E., & Congdon, W. J., et al. (2012). The long-term effects of Moving to Opportunity on adult health and economic self-sufficiency. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14(2), 109–136.
Schmidt, N. M., Glymour, M. M., & Osypuk, T. L. (2017a). Adolescence is a sensitive period for housing mobility to influence risky behaviors: an experimental design. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(4), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.10.022.
Schmidt, N. M., Glymour, M. M., & Osypuk, T. L. (2017b). Housing mobility and adolescent mental health: the role of substance use, social networks, and family mental health in the Moving to Opportunity Study. SSM - Population Health, 3, 318–325.
Schmidt, N. M., Lincoln, A. K., Nguyen, Q. C., Acevedo-Garcia, D., & Osypuk, T. L. (2014). Examining mediators of housing mobility on adolescent asthma: Results from a housing voucher experiment. Social Science & Medicine, 107(0), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.020.
Schwartz, H. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: economically integrative housing promotes academic success in montgomery county. Maryland. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
Sciandra, M., Sanbonmatsu, L., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., & Kessler, R. C., et al. (2013). Long-term effects of the Moving to Opportunity residential mobility experiment on crime and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 451–489.
Scott, M., Cunningham, M., Biess, J., O’Neil, J., Tegeler, P., Gayles, E., et al. (2013). Expanding choice: Practical strategies for building a successful housing mobiity program. InT. U. I. P. R. R. A. Council (Ed.). Washington, DC.
Simpson, G. A., & Fowler, M. G. (1994). Geographic mobility and children’s emotional/behavioral adjustment and school functioning. Pediatrics, 93(2), 303–309.
South, S., Haynie, D., & Bose, S. (2005). Residential mobility and the onset of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 499–514.
South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1997). Escaping distressed neighborhoods: Individual, community, and metropolitan influences. American Journal of Sociology, 102(4), 1040–1084.
Steffensmeier, D., & Schwartz, J. (2009). Trends in girls’ delinquency and the gender gap: Statistical assessment of diverse sources. In M. A. Zahn (Ed.), The Delinquent Girl (pp. 50–83). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557.
Terza, J. V., Basu, A., & Rathouz, P. J. (2008). Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 531–543.
Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863–891.
Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2001). The development of delinquency: an interactional perspective. In S. White (Ed.), Handbook of Youth and Justice (pp. 289–305). New York, NY: Plenum.
Tønnessen, M., Telle, K., & Syse, A. (2013). Childhood residential mobility and adult outcomes. Oslo, Norway: Statistics Norway Research Department.
Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M., & Lu, X. (2008). Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 4658–4677.
Votruba, M. E., & Kling, J. R. (2009). Effects of neighborhood characteristics on the mortality of black male youth: erom Gautreaux, Chicago. Social Science & Medicine, 68(5), 814–823.
Wang, R., & Ware, J. H. (2013). Detecting moderator effects using subgroup analyses. Prev Sci, 14(2), 111–120.
Wolff, K. T., Baglivio, M. T., Intravia, J., Greenwald, M. A., & Epps, N. (2017). The mobility of youth in the justice system: Implications for recidivism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1371–1393.
Wood, D., Halfon, N., Scarlata, D., Newacheck, P., & Nessim, S. (1993). Impact of family relocation on children’s growth, development, school function, and behavior. JAMA, 270(11), 1334–1338.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant 1R03HD082679 (Dr. Schmidt, PI). The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Minnesota Population Center (P2C HD041023) funded through a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Funders did not have any role in design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) had no role in the analysis or the preparation of this manuscript. HUD reviewed the manuscript to ensure respondent confidentiality was maintained in the presentation of results.
Authors’ Contributions
NS conceptualized and designed the study, executed all analyses, and drafted the manuscript. MK drafted the manuscript and advised on the outcomes and the interpretation of findings. TO helped conceptualize and design the study, drafted the manuscript, and advised on the interpretation of findings. All authors have approved the final manuscript as submitted.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant 1R03HD082679 (Dr. Schmidt, PI).
Data Sharing Declaration
The data set used in this manuscript was obtained under license from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. These data are not publicly available, and restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Information on how to request the MTO restricted access data may be obtained by contacting the Office of Policy Development and Research: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/mto.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Original study investigators obtained written informed consent from all families enrolled in the study at baseline.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, N.M., Krohn, M.D. & Osypuk, T.L. Modification of Housing Mobility Experimental Effects on Delinquency and Educational Problems: Middle Adolescence as a Sensitive Period. J Youth Adolescence 47, 2009–2026 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0859-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0859-9