This paper reports on an electronic mentoring program, the Digital Heroes Campaign (DHC), in which 242 youth were matched with online mentors over a two-year period. Survey, focus group, and interview data, in addition to analyses of the e-mails that pairs exchanged, were examined in order to assess the nature, types, and quality of the relationships that were formed. Despite youths’ generally positive self-reports, deep connections between mentors and mentees appeared to be relatively rare. The findings suggest that online mentoring programs face significant challenges and that further research is needed to determine under what conditions online mentoring is likely to be most effective.
Editors' Strategic Implications: Given the infrequent occurrence of close connections, youth mentoring practitioners and researchers must consider whether online mentoring is likely to promote the kind of “relationships” that might be expected to promote positive youth development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Beier, S. R., Rosenfeld, W. D., Spitalny, K. C., Zansky, S. M., & Bontempo, A. N. (2000). The potential role of an adult mentor in influencing high risk behaviors in adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 327–331.
Bennett, D., Hupert, N., Tsikalas, K., Meade, T., & Honey, M. (1998). Critical issues in the design and implementation of telementoring environments. Centre for Children and Technology. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www2.edc.org/CCT/admin/publications/report/09_1998.pdf.
Cravens, J. (2003). Online mentoring: Programs and suggested practices as of February 2001. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21(1–2), 85–109.
Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washinton, DC: National Academy Press.
Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264–288.
Ensher, E., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460–481.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 1361–1380.
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199–219.
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.
Hatcher, S. (2002). Using email with your patients. Australasian Psychiatry, 9, 207–209.
Kraus, R., Zack, J., & Stricker, G. (Eds.) (2004). Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals. Boston: Academic Press.
Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McCurdy, K. G. (2003). The perceptions of supervising counselors regarding alternative methods of communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(8-A). (UMI No. 2003-95003-029)
Miller, H., & Griffiths, M. (2005). E-mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 300–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mundorf, N., & Laird, K. (2002). Social and psychological effects of information technologies and other interactive media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 583–602). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
National Mentoring Center (2002). Perspectives on e-mentoring. A virtual panel holds an online dialogue. National Mentoring Center Newsletter, 9, 5–12. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www.nwrel.org/mentoring/pdf/bull9.pdf.
O'Neill, D. K., Wagner, R., & Gomez, L. M. (1996). Online mentors: Experimenting in science class. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 39–42.
Parra, G. R., DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., & Pugh-Lilly, A. O. (2002). Mentoring relationships for youth: Investigation of a process-oriented model. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 367–388.
Price, M. A., & Chen, H. H. (2003). Promises and challenges: Exploring a collaborative mentoring programme in a preservice teacher education programme. Mentoring and Tutoring, 11, 105–117.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today's youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Salem, D. A., Bogat, G. A., & Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2), 189–207.
Sanchez, B., & Harris, J. (1996). Online mentoring, a success story. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(8), 57–60.
Scealy, M., Phillips, J., & Stevenson, R. (2003). Shyness and anxiety as predictors of patterns of Internet usage. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 507–5156.
Segall, R. (2000). Online shrinks. Psychology Today, 32(3), 38–44.
Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. The School Counselor, 40, 327–334.
Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50–57.
Zimmerman, M. A., Bigenheimer, J. B., & Notaro, P. C. (2002). Natural mentors and adolescent resiliency: A study with urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 221–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhodes, J.E., Spencer, R., Saito, R.N. et al. Online Mentoring: The Promise and Challenges of an Emerging Approach to Youth Development. J Primary Prevent 27, 497–513 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0051-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0051-y