Abstract
This paper examines whether patriotism and other forms of group partiality can be justified and what are the moral limits on actions performed to benefit countries and other groups. In particular, I ask whether partiality toward one’s country (or other groups) can justify attacking enemy civilians to achieve victory or other political goals. Using a rule utilitarian approach, I then (a) defend the legitimacy of “moderate” patriotic partiality but (b) argue that noncombatant immunity imposes an absolute constraint on what may be done to promote the interests of a country or other group involved in warfare or other forms of violent conflict.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Keller (2007, Chapter 1).
Nagel (1991, pp. 3–5).
Aleksandar Pavković raises the same issue but takes a different approach to them in Pavković ( 2007 ).
Pavković (2002, pp. 58–71).
Pavković ( 2002, p. 59).
Pavković ( 2002, p. 60).
Pavković ( 2002, pp. 62, 66).
Pavković ( 2002, p. 66).
Pavković ( 2002, p. 67).
Pavković ( 2002, p. 61).
Pavković (2002, p. 71).
Brandt (1974, p. 32). In Nathanson (Forthcoming), I argue that this claim is inconsistent with Brandt’s overall rule utilitarian position.
Downes (2008, pp. 136–137).
For a different but overlapping approach, see Erskine (2000).
Nagel (1991, p. 4).
For a good discussion of these tensions, see Benvenisti (2006).
For evidence of widespread support for noncombatant immunity, see the results of surveys done in many countries in International Committee of the Red Cross (2000).
The phrase comes from Anderson (1983).
Brandt (1974, p. 26).
The following argument for noncombatant immunity is developed more fully in Nathanson (Forthcoming).
Wells (1996).
World War I was not free of anti-civilian strategies. For discussion of the use of blockades, see Downes (2008, Chapter 3).
Gert (1998, pp. 236–237).
For a description and ethical analysis of the Allied bombing of cities in World War II, see Grayling (2006).
Walzer (1997, pp. 258–260).
For a discussion of fallibility and poor judgment in war, see Iklé (1991).
Primoratz explains this concept in Primoratz (2006, pp. 34–35).
Coady (2002, p. 20).
Primoratz (2007).
Primoratz (2007, p. 57).
Primoratz defends the view that Palestinians have faced this type of moral disaster in Primoratz (2006, pp. 35–38). He denies, however, that Palestinian terrorism has been morally justified, claiming that their terrorism did not (and does not) have a reasonable chance of success.
References
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Benvenisti, E. 2006. Human dignity in combat: The duty to spare enemy civilians. Israel Law Review 39: 81–109.
Brandt, R. 1974. Utilitarianism and the rules of war. In War and moral responsibility, ed. M. Cohen, et al. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Chang, I. 1998. The rape of Nanking: The forgotten holocaust of World War II. Penguin: New York.
Coady, T. 2002. Terrorism, just war and supreme emergency. In Terrorism and justice, ed. T. Coady, and M. O’Keefe. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.
Downes, A. 2008. The targeting of civilians in war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Erskine, T. 2000. Embedded cosmopolitanism and the case of war: Restraint, discrimination and overlapping communities. Global Society 14: 569–590.
Gert, B. 1998. Morality: It nature and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gomberg, P. 2002. Patriotism is like racism. In Patriotism, ed. I. Primoratz. Amherst: Humanity Books.
Goodin, R. 1988/89. What is so special about our fellow countrymen? Ethics 98: 663–686.
Grayling, A.C. 2006. Among the dead cities: The history and moral legacy of the WWII bombing of civilians in Germany and Japan. New York: Walker.
Iklé, Fred. 1991. Every war must end. New York: Columbia University Press. Revised Edition.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2000). The people on war (Geneva: ICRC); <www.icrc.org>.
Keller, S. 2007. The limits of loyalty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleinig, J. 2007. Patriotic loyalty. In Patriotism: Philosophical and political perspectives, ed. Igor. Primoratz, and Aleksandar. Pavković, 37–54. Aldershot: Ashgate.
MacIntyre, A. 2002. Is patriotism a virtue? In Patriotism, ed. I. Primoratz, 43–58. Amherst: Humanity Books.
Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nathanson, S. 1993. Patriotism, morality, and peace. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Nathanson, S. 1989. In defense of ‘moderate patriotism’. Ethics 99: 535–552.
Nathanson, S. 2002. Is patriotism like racism? In Patriotism, ed. I. Primoratz. Amherst: Humanity Books.
Nathanson, S. 2006. Terrorism, supreme emergency, and noncombatant immunity. Iyyun 55: 3–25.
Nathanson, S. 2007. Is cosmopolitan anti-patriotism a virtue? In Patriotism, ed. I. Primoratz, and A. Pavković. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Nathanson, S. Forthcoming. Terrorism and the ethics of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pavković, A. 2002. Towards liberation: Terrorism from a liberation ideology perspective. In Terrorism and justice, ed. T. Coady, and M. O’Keefe, 58–71. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Pavković, A. 2007. Killing for one’s country. In Patriotism, ed. I. Primoratz, and A. Pavković, 219–234. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Primoratz, I. 2006. Terrorism in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Iyyun 55: 63.
Primoratz, I. 2007. Civilian immunity in war: Its grounds, scope, and weight. In Civilian immunity in war, ed. I. Primoratz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. 2002. One world. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Walzer, M. 1977. Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books.
Wells, D. 1996. Casualties of War. In An encyclopedia of war and ethics, ed. D. Wells, 55–56. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Acknowledgments
My thanks are due to Igor Primoratz for helpful comments on a draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nathanson, S. Patriotism, War, and the Limits of Permissible Partiality. J Ethics 13, 401–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9065-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9065-z